What is remarkable, in light of what was contained in that paper, is how so many Pakistanis consider Urdu to be their indigenous language.
As a teacher I noticed that second language skills, be they Urdu, Pashtu, Farsi or Panjabi where MUCH higher amongst young Pakistani students compared to Sikhs who, more often than not, were barely able to communicate in their mother tongue.
Pakistani students themselves were acutely aware of the issues around Urdu and Panjabi, with some openly claiming that Urdu is a beautiful language whilst Panjabi was 'vulgar' and common. A few Pak proPanjabi students were also aware of the fact that the language was dying in their country without support.
Notice how the paper suggests that apnay were cool about teaching their children Panjabi when faced with the associated issues of social mobility restrictions arising from it. It goes back to that old notion of apnay being status obsessed over most other things.
The truth is that most of us second gens, learned the language not because we wanted to, but because our parents English was so poor. The inadvertent side effect of this was to make us fluent. But even then you come across those who can understand it, but are unable to speak it.
I spoke about this to some freshies (who have very young children here) at the Gurdwara recently and what I found was that they were completely oblivious to the linguistics issues that they will face in relation to their children growing up here.
But with that all said, people have never had to so good, with so much literature available for free online, and various free language resources available too (like edictionaries). But it doesn't appear as if the motivation to preserve, develop and learn the language exists to any great extent?
Edited by dalsingh101, 19 May 2011 - 11:56 AM.