Jonny101

SIKHS 60% others 03% hindus 37% As long as there are Hindus who support terrorist activity such as operation blue star against the peaceful Sikh community there can never be peace. Peace starts with one first admitting their faults and apologizing for their wrong doing and from there reconciliation happens.

http://ssosan.tripod.com/carn/carnage-1.htm It's a must read. Although the book was about the congress party's involvement in the Sikh genocide but it's strange how it was the BJP which banned the book. Just comes to show us that on the matter of the Sikhs, but congressi and BJP hindus are the same.

I agree. Although I don't have much expectations from BJP. They were in power in the late 90s and didn't do squat for bringing justice. If anything they actually showed their true colours when they banned a book by Sardar Gurcharan Singh Babbar on the topic of 84 riots. AAP seems like a good party which can bring justice. Sikhs should support them.

Shivaji was high caste? what are you smoking? he belonged to a low caste. Yet this brave Dalit showed Hindus how to live with honour. But how did Hindus repay him? when Shiva Jee was going to be crowed as King as per Vedic rights, he asked the Maratha Brahmins to perform Hindu rituals. The Maratha Brahmins refused saying he is a low caste and so they will perform vedic rights on him. Shiva Jee then had to bring and pay Brahmins from UP to perform the Vedic rituals. Castism is one of the corner stones of Hinduism. It was has been there for thousands of years. Look how high caste Hindus would mistreat Dalits for thousands of years. Even apartheid was not this oppressive.

what an embellished view of history you have. Punjabi Hindus were humiliated repeatedly by the Muslims. It took the Dalit Marathas to liberate much of central India. And when did they clear Darbar Sahib? stop these lies. Whenever Muslims invaded India not one Hindu stayed back in the Mandirs to die for his Bhagawan. It was common place for Muslims to destroy the moorties and use them as stone tiles in their Masjit. Hindu women were the biggest victims of Hindu cowardice. So many Lakhs of Hindu women were taken and sold into slavery by the Muslims. It took the Sikhs to save them and give a befitting reply to the Muslims. But the ungrateful Hindus who instead of thanking the Sikhs for this, payed us back by raping our women in 1984 and attacking Darbar Sahib.

Please no BSing. Even a blind person can see Durgiana Mandir was was built in competition to Darbar Sahib. Durgiana mandir doesn't even have any historical significance to the Hindu religion, yet Hindus have copied it's look and demand that it be given the same status as Darbar Sahib on national and international level. The Hindus of Punjab were fully demanding the attack on the Darbar Sahib. After the attack by the terrorist Hindu army, their was joy in all Hindu homes, Hindus were even seen distributing sweets in support of this Hindu terrorist act. It was common to see Hindus hanging pictures of Indira Gandhi fashioned like Durga Mata in their homes. There were even many cases of Hindus being caught pre 1984 throwing cigarettes and Bidis into the Sarovar of Darbar Sahib. But each time Sikhs never hurt them for this insulting act and just handed them over to the police. Yet police never once charged them because they were Hindus.

Actually N30 Singh Veerji, it's not his fault. Problem is, Hindus do not understand the real meaning of dying for one's Deen Dharm. Why do you think whenever Muslim invaders would conquer India, when they would come across a Mandir, they would find it totally abandoned. Not one Hindu would remain there to fight for the honour of his Bhagwan. The Muslims very often would desecrate the Mandir, destroy the moortees, very often making stone tiles out of the moorties which they would then install in their masjids so the Muslim would walk on them before praying to Allah. This is the kind of humiliation Hindus had faced at the hands of Muslims. On the other hand, 84 is just a chapter in the long glorious history of Sikh heroes fighting to the death for the honour of their Guru's house. When Ahmad Shah Abdali went to Mathura he found all the most secred Mandirs relating to Sri Krishna abandoned. Not one hindu remained to defend the Mandirs. Compare this with when Ahmad Shah Abdali went to Darbar Sahib. 30 Singhs remained there under Baba Gurbaksh Singh Jee. The Singhs knew full well that they would become Shaheed but they chose to fight till death. So, no he will not understand even if you give him the examples of Somnath or Jaganath being attacked. It's a foreign concept to them. The only time they know how to fight back is what they did in Babri Masjid. For hundreds of years, Hindus who dominated the whole of ayodhya and the surrounding areas never dared to touch Babri Masjid for fear of Muslims. But after it was abandoned and no longer being used by the Muslims, they formed a mob of thousands of Bhayas and attacked the Masjid. They call this "bravery".

What is wrong is that the British government helped the terrorists(the Indian army) in attacking the Sikhs in Harmandir Sahib. And for what crime could Indira legally hold Sant Bhindranwale? just because he is a Sikh he should be arrested for no reason? Hindus refusing to admit the terrorist attack on the Sikhs in Harmandir Sahib is the most disgraceful thing the Hindus can do. Even Muslims are better in the sense that atleast most of them admit that Aruangzeb was wrong in persecuting the Sikhs. But Hindus are to this day proud of there terrorism against the Sikhs.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-11-16/india/30405184_1_siropa-avtar-singh-makkar-l-k-advani

Cherry picking history I see. Hindus are the one's responsible for attacking Harmandir Sahib. Indira Gandhi only attacked because all over North India, Hindus were demanding an attack. LK Advani very proudly writes in his autobiography that it was because of his(Hindutva) pressure that Indira Gandhi attacked Sri Darbar Sahib. After the attack, Hindus all over Punjab began to dance in joy and distribute sweets. This was like rubbing salt on the wound for the Sikhs. Due to operation bluestar, the next elections the congress party became so highly regarded amongst the Hindus that they won a land slide electoral victory. The commandos that attacked were 98% Hindus. They had a so called Sikh figure head who lead the attack was intended to show the world and say "see even Sikhs are supporting this attack". Hindus have so much love for Darbar Sahib, then why did the Hindus under the leadership of Lala Lajpat Rai and other Punjabi Hindu leaders create the Durgiana Mandir in competition to Harmandir Sahib? Hindus love Harmandir Sahib so much that when Sikhs carried out a peaceful procession demanding Amritsar be declared a Holy City as Banaras is for Hindus, the Hindus of Amritsar carried out a counter protest at the instigation of Lala Jagat Narain demanding Amritsar not be given holy city status. Hindus love Harmandir Sahib so much that in 1982 a large terrorist Hindu mob had gathered and attempted to attack Harmandir Sahib, they only dispersed when a few Sikhs who were present there clashed with them. But before they could retreat some surrounding property and vehicles were damaged. Hindus Love Harmandir Sahib so much that they demanded the Indian government to attack Darbar Sahib which resulted in the slaughter of thousands of Sikhs. Hindus love Harmandir Sahib so much that they began to dance with joy and distribute sweets all over Punjab after operation blue star was over. Yeah such love makes my stomach turn