challenge_everything

Satkartar

Looking over the pages of history many different avatars have graced the land of India with their presence.

Baba Gurbachan Singh Ji ‘ Khalsa’ Bhindrawale was the Jathedar of the original Samparda Bhindrawale Taksal at Gurdwara Akhand Parkash in Bhinder-Kala (currently Sant-Giani Mohan Singh Ji ‘Khalsa’ Bhindrawale).

Baba Ji is also considered a Jathedar of the modern day Mehat-Chowk Taksaal at Gurdwara Gurdarshan Parkash by modern day ‘Damdami Taksalis’ (www.damdamitaksal.org, www.damdamitaksal.com).

Baba Ji lists some small facts about the 10 Guru Sahibs on pages 13 to 23 of his book ‘Gurbani Paath Darshan’.

Baba Ji states that the “Bedi†family of Guru Nanak Maharaaj can be linked back to a Kush the son of Siri Raam Chandra. And because a descendant of Kush studied the Vedas at Kanshee the family was called the “Bedi†family.

Guru Angad Maharaaj Ji’s “Tehan†lineage is said to go back to to the son of Siri Lashman Ji whose name was Takh and hence his lineage was known as the ‘Tehan’ family.

Guru Amardass Ji’s “Bhalla†lineage can be linked to the brother of Siri Raam Chandra whose name was Bharath, his son Bhallan is said to have given his name to the “Bhalla†family.

Guru Raamdass Ji’s “Sodhi†lineage can be linked back to Luv the son of Siri Raam Chandra. The descendants of Luv won over the kingdom of “Snoaudh†and from there the “Sodhi†family descends.

In this way Baba Ji has linked all of the Gurus back to the family of Siri Raam Chandra Ji. We cannot deny these links as they are agreed upon not only by Panth-Rattan Baba Gurbachan Singh ‘Khalsa’ but also many other Nirmala, Udasi and Sevapanthi Gurmukh Pyare, Sadhu Sants. This is also confirmed by the writings of Dashmesh Pitta Guru Gobind Singh in ‘Bachittar-Natak’.

Can we really say that the entire of the 10 Gurus lineage linking back to Siri Raam Chandra is a coincidence? Or should we just ignore this true fact just in case we are scared of being classed as ‘Hindus’?

“We have just enough religion to hate one another, but not enough Dharma to love one another.â€

vah ji vah...brrrruaaaah!

Rudra and Kali - can be interpreted as a devta and devi... but really they represent more the masculine and feminine aspects of Akaaal.

All in all beautiful baani.... Dhan dhan Guru Gobind Singh JI... vah ji vah

where is an intense longing for waheguru born - is it conceivable that human grasps could further bairaag - i think not - maybe i'm a fool - infact i am so maafee for my moorakh comments

but true bairaag is god given with gurparsaad and stabs an arrow through ure heart

which is why i dont think you can 'work' on ure bairaag avastha

sabh gobind hai sabh gobind hai

They were written by Bhai Mani Singh later....he was not present at Hazur Sahib when Maharaaj left for Sachkhand. Bhai Mani Singh was head-granthi of Darbar Sahib at the time and was carrying out his duties at Amritsar.

It was Bhai Heer Singh Ji (the likhari or scribe) who wrote these lines down, it was his job he used to reccord what maharaaj ji did and said throughout the day. For verification of this fact you can see page 24 of the 'Gurbani Paath Darshan' written by Siri-Maan, Panth-Rattan, Vidiya-Maartand, Sant-Giani Gurbachan Singh Ji 'Khalsa' Bhinderanwale. And you could also go to Hazur Sahib and see this dohra written in Bhai Heer Singh Ji's Granth.

Its a common mistake when common sikh sangat read this dohra they read the following wrong

"Jo Prubh Ko Miliyo Chahae Khoj Shabad Meh Leh"

The mistake they make is they say "Milboch" instead of "Miliyo Chahae" this is because many people have seen this wirtten down as "Milboch" in many different Gutkas, but according to Sant-Giani Gurbachan Singh Ji's findings in the Likhari Granth the true pronunciation is "Miliyo Chahae" as is written in Bhai Heer Singh Ji's likhari granth.

Peace and love

one interpretation by sampardas such as damdami taksaal is that this line refers to those who claim that they are god.

'jo hum ko parmesur ucharhai, te subh narak kund mai parhai'
'those who call themselves god, will burn in deepest hell'

A deeper interpretation of this line refers to each person believing that this ego is ones self. In reality thats not true it is the Atmaa which is eternal. So calling 'me' god is guru sahib saying those who dont understanding the true self which inevitably slip into the dark hell of mis-understanding and ignorance from the truth.

love CE

sabh gobind hai sabh gobind hai

one interpretation by sampardas such as damdami taksaal is that this line refers to those who claim that they are god.

'jo hum ko parmesur ucharhai, te subh narak kund mai parhai'
'those who call themselves god, will burn in deepest hell'

A deeper interpretation of this line refers to each person believing that this ego is ones self. In reality thats not true it is the Atmaa which is eternal. So calling 'me' god is guru sahib saying those who dont understanding the true self which inevitably slip into the dark hell of mis-understanding and ignorance from the truth.

love CE

one interpretation by sampardas such as damdami taksaal is that this line refers to those who claim that they are god.

'jo hum ko parmesur ucharhai, te subh narak kund mai parhai'
'those who call themselves god, will burn in deepest hell'

A deeper interpretation of this line refers to each person believing that this ego is ones self. In reality thats not true it is the Atmaa which is eternal. So calling 'me' god is guru sahib saying those who dont understanding the true self which inevitably slip into the dark hell of mis-understanding and ignorance from the truth.

love CE

where is an intense longing for waheguru born - is it conceivable that human grasps could further bairaag - i think not - maybe i'm a fool - infact i am so maafee for my moorakh comments

but true bairaag is god given with gurparsaad and stabs an arrow through ure heart

which is why i dont think you can 'work' on ure bairaag avastha