Jump to content

kdsingh80

Members
  • Content count

    2,314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

kdsingh80 last won the day on May 19

kdsingh80 had the most liked content!

About kdsingh80

  • Rank
    Sayana Bacha||Sayani Bachi
  • Birthday 07/18/1980

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    Even if Sikhistan failed they should had secure Kashmir like status for Sikhs.Even Some Hindu kings did not sign accession as fast as sikh maharajah's did
  2. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    I don't think Radcliffe took such recent data for partition. Even if sikhs had done the same but on papers that area was muslim majority then it was going to awarded to Pakistan
  3. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    How stupid Nehru and Mountbatton could have been , why they didn't ask Jinnah to control riots in west punjab first.Everything was started by muslims from Rawalpindi riots to Train attacks in Lahore when deadly retaliation came they started crying
  4. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    Even American media published news of train attacks on muslims by sikhs, strangely you will not find a single news of muslims attacking sikh/hindu train
  5. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    The blame of starting partition violence is on muslims but sikhs are so much blamed for massacres after partition , even random search will land you on British articles newspapers blaming sikhs
  6. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    I was talking about Punjab
  7. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    Also I would like to know if Maharah of Patiala wanted sikhistan and was provoking sikhs to attack muslims then why he signed accession in India without securing sikh rights
  8. Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies:

    Nisid Hajari is not Pakistani , he is born in India and bought up in Washington
  9. Why Sikhs are blamed so much for partition violence?
  10. Try tube patka , it is thelatest fashion. , it gives a dastar look and being very light on head
  11. Few, Karna humilating Arjuna on 16th day is not part of the above sources.Similarly there were plenty of warriors who were very deadly and use to consider themselves at par with Arjuna or Bheeshma .Similalrly Drona was also known to know many vidya's. On jaydrath vadh day , he prepared a kawach for Duryodhana through some mantra's that Arjuna was unable to break that. Krishna then show Arjun that nails of Duryodhana don't have any protection and Arjun arrows their..Bheema was very mighty warrior and on Jaydrath vadh day he defeated karna so that Arjun can by pass him. Bhim single handedly destroyed 20 akshauni sena of Duryodhan
  12. @chatanga1 If you really interested in Mahabharata then please read it from ancient sources rather than relying on Dramatised presentation of BR Chopra serial. many experts believe that Mahabharata of BR 's version was full of flaws http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/ You can start it from here
  13. That was different issue.Duryodhan actually believed that he has broken agyaatvaas of Pandavas. Giving 5 villages to them means that Duryodhan had to concede that Pandava's successfully completed agyaatvaas .Even though 5 villages were given the war was inevitable as Arjuna Bhima Karna Duryodhana would have come face to face somewhere else As far Kashmir is concerend. iNDIA SHOULD HAD GIVEN kashmir in 50s while retaining jammu and Ladakh.Giving an inch of land now means pieces of India. The first victim of Kashmir giving will be muslims who will face wrath of Hindu's Jihadi's will take victory of Kashmir as victory of islam over Kafirs and recruit lakhs naxals , northeast separatist movements will get boost for independence. possibly Tamilians may also start demand their Tamil nation the whole India may end up in civil war So both situations are different Also Duryodhan was not so evil like Aurangzeb , he just hated pandava's and believed that the thrown is his
×