Maha Kharag Singh

Glad to see a Budha Dal representative on the net (if he is genuine)

that halal was incompassionate and barbaric. the people were laughing while the bull was slaughtered.

i think i went a lil over board, but I still hold to the fact that the AKJ offer what is entertainment for the crowds, as i have witnessed many accounts of biasedness towards who can do kirtan on their stages, where if it dont fit in with their mood u aint doin kirtan. but then again i am a moorakh, someone who should concentrate on his own love for God than point the finger at others. Bhul Chuk Maaf

even namdhari guru, Partap Singh Ji, went to Sach Khand Sahib and sent his followers to Sach Khand Sahib to get the maryada, why wasnt a big objection made then? The issue of eating meat or not is a purely subjective moral decision that EVERYONE has to make. Remember Sri Satguru Granth Sahib is not DICTATORIAL rather it gives us choices so that everything lies on our conscious being and Karam, which leads us how to lead our Dharam. Otherwise with what right can Sri Akaal Ji condemn and salvage if everything is preordained?

interesting point, however for those who have shardha and wish to read from these granths, to keep them requires alot fo satkar, which not everyone has the capacity and the internet provides a medium for which to reffer to such texts without disrespecting the bania by not doing the correct satkar

singh jeo, most times all you see is someone on a vaja blasting tunes that are "entertaining" grabbing tukhs from here and there to prove a point, when the whole shabad from where they extracted the tikh from could have contradicted what they are trying to prove. Moshing is moving your head in extreme motion to a rythem

all you lot need to chill, this maryada has been going on for three hundred years, from the time sri satguru gobind singh ji sache patshah, why are you getting your kachere in a twist? when a load of mahapursh went to sri sachkhand sahib to get maryadas for their samprayadas why wasnt the issue raised then if it was soo wrong.

thank you, efforts are seamless!! How about getting Sri Sarbloh Guru Darbar on there, thats what the net is truley missing

i think it was just added to which ever Satguru it gave a ring to like Satguru Raamdaas Dev Ji dont have a ring as Satguru Arjun Dev Ji does

where is the love for god when in fact all that you are doing is playing tunes that are entertaining and will ensure you get some moshing?

loved it, maha bir rass

lets go call the rehit police

Mr Kam, This is one thing which fathoms me, previous avtars like the likes of Krishna cannot be considered as manifestations of God, then why do we consider Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji as a direct manifestation of God. Doesnt this go against the whole "science" of God, that Sri Mahakaal cannot take birth. Sri Satguru Nanak in my eyes was the physical manifestation of Brahmgian, something which is the knowledge of Brahm or God but not God itself, otherwise how different would we be from mainstream hindus who consider each of their kul devta as GOD. as for my version of the whole concept of yugs heres a coppied bit from another thread. Just to add to the theory as to how such a concept can be translated in such a cynical "Richard Dawkins" society, in my humble opinion, just as faith, social structure, human conciousness etc has developed over time these four Yugs are periods of development of mankind's perception of faith and sociology. Where as our primitive minds developed over time, newer technologies and philosophies dawned on us and when we made a significant break through development it had been labelled as the end or start of a Yug, e.g. the dark ages and then the renaissance. One prime example which comes to mind is how religion/society developed, where we moved from privative sun/moon worship to paganism and then to polytheism and then to monotheism and now to atheism etc. etc. where all of these levels of faith drove individuals outlook on how society should be structured (e.g. hierarchies to divine rule etc.) and then lead to political movements such as crusades etc. One may also perceive the days and nights of Brahma as the cycles of periods of intellectual development and periods of ignorance have flourished throughout world history e.g. the dark ages which lead to the flourishing of knowledge during the prosperous reign of the Roman empire where Greek phillosophy was born taking mankind out of the rut of polytheism and barbaric ritualism to make mankind think (virtue theory) which after the demise of the Roman empire plunged us back into the dark ages an age of great ignorance and religious dictatorship after which came the renaissance a revival of philosophy and knowledge that had been lost for hundreds to thousands of years, which then led to another dark period of religious dictatorship which was broken by the enlightenment or romanticism. I know its a bit long winded but a pattern can be seen ignorance - knowledge - ignorance etc Therefore in conclusion, maybe these concepts arent to be taken seriously but as poetic genious of our Satgurus and the ancient rishi munis who came up with these concepts.

Congrats to everyone, and thank Sri Mahakaal for sending Sri Satguru Nanak Dev Ji and taking this world out of its rut. From the tyrannical hands of Islam and hypocrosy of Brahmanvaad.

lol: so wed all better play our cards right

apparently a fatwa was released against niddar singh by Baba Joginder Singh Ji Rakbe waale, due to his comments about allowing woment to shave their netherregions, is this true.

i thin ksant jarnail singh ji bhindrawale has done katha on akal ustat, and i think its in gurmatveechar.com

i think assa di vaar was one of the morning paaths aswell

pm me i have some pics

Interesting points put forward by Bhai Tirath Singh Ji and Shaheediya Veerji about the Yug concept. Just to add to the theory as to how such a concept can be translated in such a cynical "Richard Dawkins" society, in my humble opinion, just as faith, social structure, human conciousness etc has developed over time these four Yugs are periods of development of mankind's perception of faith and sociology. Where as our primitive minds developed over time, newer technologies and philosophies dawned on us and when we made a significant break through development it had been labelled as the end or start of a Yug, e.g. the dark ages and then the renaissance. One prime example which comes to mind is how religion/society developed, where we moved from privative sun/moon worship to paganism and then to polytheism and then to monotheism and now to atheism etc. etc. where all of these levels of faith drove individuals outlook on how society should be structured (e.g. hierarchies to divine rule etc.) and then lead to political movements such as crusades etc. One may also perceive the days and nights of Brahma as the cycles of periods of intellectual development and periods of ignorance have flourished throughout world history e.g. the dark ages which lead to the flourishing of knowledge during the prosperous reign of the Roman empire where Greek phillosophy was born taking mankind out of the rut of polytheism and barbaric ritualism to make mankind think (virtue theory) which after the demise of the Roman empire plunged us back into the dark ages an age of great ignorance and religious dictatorship after which came the renaissance a revival of philosophy and knowledge that had been lost for hundreds to thousands of years, which then led to another dark period of religious dictatorship which was broken by the enlightenment or romanticism. I know its a bit long winded but a pattern can be seen ignorance - knowledge - ignorance etc Therefore in conclusion, maybe these concepts arent to be taken seriously but as poetic genious of our Satgurus and the ancient rishi munis who came up with these concepts.

probably some bhaiya reporting, whos stuck up raj thakreys arse to jeopardise sikh's names.

the chandi in shastar always require blood. Just as Mahachandis unquenchable thirst for rakht

I expected this from you. So typical....

from what ive heard, a nihung mahapursh whos name i wont mention went round the whole of bharat and made copies (by hand) of each puratan bir, and was willing to present his lifes work to the comittee responsible for standardising Sri Satguru Granth Sahib, he requested that his life's work be look at first before standarising a copy but his request fell upon deaf ears. it is said that there are as much as 10000 mistakes. this is the ghor biadbi happening in this world

Kachi Lassi da shitta is an encient tradition. Id like to see how much punn daan these people who critisise do themselves, instead of pointing fingers at Takhts. I think we all forget that a takht is an authority if we didnt no one would dare question. but anyways as Satguru Nanak Says Jo Kisch Kahai Pichay Pashutae