Jump to content
Genie Singh

Science And Islam:

Recommended Posts

Daulat Rai was right for the fact that Hindus(and India) was enslaved by the Muslims because Hindus were too divided amongst different sects, castes, Gods, scriptures. Muslims had unity of their faith. They believed in one God, one Koran and one Ummah. In Punjab at least it took the Sikhs who were also similarly united in the belief in One God, One Guru Granth Sahib and One United Panth against an external enemy. When Muslims would declare their Jihad, Sikhs in turn would declare a Dharm Yudh. Their Ghazis were no match for the Sant Sipahi Khalsa Sikhs. Muslims had finally met their match in every way.

Even now, Hindus of India should embrace Sikhi. It is in the best interest of India and will make India stronger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daulat Rai was right for the fact that Hindus(and India) was enslaved by the Muslims because Hindus were too divided amongst different sects, castes, Gods, scriptures. Muslims had unity of their faith. They believed in one God, one Koran and one Ummah. In Punjab at least it took the Sikhs who were also similarly united in the belief in One God, One Guru Granth Sahib and One United Panth against an external enemy. When Muslims would declare their Jihad, Sikhs in turn would declare a Dharm Yudh. Their Ghazis were no match for the Sant Sipahi Khalsa Sikhs. Muslims had finally met their match in every way.

Even now, Hindus of India should embrace Sikhi. It is in the best interest of India and will make India stronger

Two common misconceptions here:

First that india offered little resistance, first look up battle of baraich as an example.

Second, of the universality of hindu faith.

Parts of the south, gujurat, parts of rrajasthan etc. We're the centre's of hindu dharam.

Many areas like Biharis were bhuddist, as well as afghanistan.

A

Many groups stuck to traditional religion, forsaking the Vedas. Yeah, they became shudra but Americans are shudra what say o bramins have their?

This is how kashmir became muslim:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rinchan

Many people were never hindu, so in fact when many hinduvta say the ancestors of Sikhs of Muslims were hindu, many weren't. Especially in the case of Sikhs.

It is distorting history, to say that the khalsa singlehandedly saved the weaklings of India.

Even many 'bbramins' have military feats that are much above American soldiers crying in Iraq.

http://www.historynet.com/battle-for-chitor-storming-the-last-hindu-fortress-in-1567.htm

Those are relatives of mine, as is rana pratap which is why I know of them. You can't call them coward, and the purataan khalsa wrote about bhim, etc. And the difference.

The difference is what onion others use a hammer to crush, the khalsa uses its hands.

Where there is a single brave warrior, there are 96,000,000 Khalsa.

The difference is one of ability, not valour.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਹਿ | |

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...