albcan Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 now reason Sikh leaders did not ask or go hard for a separate country was cause they had common sense and knew that they would be economically in trouble and their economy would be controlled by india or pakistan cause their were no ocean ports that would surround a khalistan in 1947 meaning their would be no way to trade their goods and services unless they pay and do what Pakistan and india tells them to in exchange for the right to use their ports heck Pakistan and india would just play the middle man and take the majority of the money made when it came to trade without an ocean how would khalistan transport goods to other countries and how would they receive goods lik cars from other countries as well akalis used the demands for a separate country for politics to gain Sikh support in hopes of coming into power most the akalis were corrupt politicans who wanted power but had to compete with congress so they demanded Sikhs be given a Sikh majority state thinking this would give them the chance to be in control of Punjab so the govt agreed and gave Punjab majority Sikh population by cutting off hindu majority districts from Punjab and turning into Haryana and himichal pradesh akalis playing politics and having to compete with congress in Punjab and who were the party in delhi attacked the congress for breaking up the Punjab even though this is what they demanded the akalis agreed to the water agreement in exchange for a Sikh majority state cause for Haryana to exist they needed access to Punjab's water which the akalis agreed then akalis turned around play politics and attacked congress over Punjab water going to Haryana even though this is what akalis agreed to in exchange for a Sikh majority state they did this so Sikhs would get angry at congress over the water issues hoping they would vote for akalis in protest against akalis then the green revolution was funded by congress in new delhi cause Punjab had the best soil and most of india was starving in exchange for the investment the politicans in Punjab allowed delhi to control the prices of the crops from the green revolution so they could keep the prices low enough to feed the starving rather then letting the crops be put on the free market and politicans in Punjab again used it to their advantage having Sikhs emotional about why their crops could not be sold on the free market and why dehli got to control the prices it was cause of the investments 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyhp32 Posted April 17, 2014 Report Share Posted April 17, 2014 Another Hindu scholar come to 'enlighten' us! I always say a Hindu soorma is a contradiction but now a Hindu vidhwan may also be a contradiction in terms! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted April 17, 2014 Report Share Posted April 17, 2014 Looks like you have never read Granth sahib. If you had read the holy book you would have noticed almost each and every poet was a Hindu. No Khalsa vidhwan (is that an oxymoron?) words included in GGS Why are you so keen on broadcasting to the world that you are moron... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAadmin Posted April 17, 2014 Report Share Posted April 17, 2014 Looks like you have never read Granth sahib. If you had read the holy book you would have noticed almost each and every poet was a Hindu. No Khalsa vidhwan (is that an oxymoron ?) words included in GGS Ermm not really, all the bhagats were vaishnav (were intially sargun upasakh went from sargun to nirgun), all were included as akaal purkh are protector for weak , nirgun upasakh yes but they are rejected hindu/ outer hindu rituals/empty rituals, they were not hindu in -karam khandi/bhramin eltist sense hell all the bhagats have broken karam kands of their religion accepted gurmat - mystic layer of snatan/puratan gurmat. Even definition of bhramin has been reiterated to its original source- again big slap on corrupt hindu bhramin elitist who have changed bhramin into social caste system to control others like sheeps. Khalsa truly came to reiterrate uphold propagate sikh snatan/puratan dharma in original pristine state, everyone is welcome even curropt hindu bhramins but after they remove chip on their shoulders and see the reality what it is- which is sit with everyone else equally without any distinction on floor have langar and eventually have amrit from same batta which is one and universal available to all humanity..!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BhagatSingh Posted April 18, 2014 Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 No Khalsa vidhwan (is that an oxymoron?) Sher you generally make good arguments but I think you should avoid such comments. It's no different to the comment by Tonyhp. Which one of you is the vidhwan then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted April 18, 2014 Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 (edited) I agree...i stooped down to his level. That said, I am not claiming to be a vidhwan, just a plain sikh (as in student, shishya). student, shishya of whom/what? Edited April 18, 2014 by OnPathToSikhi 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted April 18, 2014 Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 Anyone exposing the tat khalsa, neo-Sikh agenda of usurping Sikhi got to be a moron. Your bigotry and fanaticism is exposed by such belittling comments. Anyone who is to be exposed here is you. Many have reasoned with you with utmost decency and yet you fail to understand. On a topic's convenience you call yourself a Hindu and sometimes call yourself a Sikh. The fact is you are nothing. All that fanaticism and bigotry talk you can say that about yourself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted April 18, 2014 Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 Bhagats have broken karam kands... did they do so because of Sikhi/Gurmat or is it vice versa (Bhagats influencing Gurmat)? Don't play with words that you do not understand, else explain who is a Bhagat and what is Gurmat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amarjeet Singh_1737 Posted April 23, 2014 Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 Anyone who is to be exposed here is you. Many have reasoned with you with utmost decency and yet you fail to understand. On a topic's convenience you call yourself a Hindu and sometimes call yourself a Sikh. The fact is you are nothing. All that fanaticism and bigotry talk you can say that about yourself.Whilst attempting to answer his blatant idiocracy, you will become an idiot yourself. He has already derailed the entire thread once. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BhagatSingh Posted April 23, 2014 Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 Whilst attempting to answer his blatant idiocracy, you will become an idiot yourself. He has already derailed the entire thread once. You two should get a room. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 Hahaha! and two body-bags too ? Can you please elaborate? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted April 26, 2014 Report Share Posted April 26, 2014 Hahaha! and two body-bags too ? Elaborate please. "cat" got your tongue?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.