jaspreetkaur Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 http://stopblasphemy.blog.com/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paapiman Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 From the above link: Quote 38/52 A Sikh should marry a Sikh. Do not give a daughter’s hand to a clean shaven. Give her hand in a house where God’s Sikhi exists, where the household is not in debt, is of a good nature, disciplined and knowledgeable. Unquote Srimaan 108 Sant Baba Nand Singh jee Kaleranwale's Bachan- Never marry your daughter to a house, where meat and alcohol are consumed, but accept a lady (as daughter-in-law) from such a house. Life of the lady, who marries into a household (where meat and alcohol are consumed) has the potential to become miserable, while the lady from such a house, has the potential to grow spiritually with her husband and in-laws.. Bhul chuk maaf 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ASD Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Does this rule apply to Sikh men as well? As in 'don't give your son's hand to a house where God's Sikhi doesn't exist'? Sikhism is supposed to represent equality, so it should apply this way too right? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragmaala Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Have you ever heard of the term "puttar daan" ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnSikhGirl Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 10 hours ago, Guest ASD said: Does this rule apply to Sikh men as well? As in 'don't give your son's hand to a house where God's Sikhi doesn't exist'? Sikhism is supposed to represent equality, so it should apply this way too right? I think this was written when the girl would inivetibly move in with the in-laws. Not applicable today as most couples don't live with inlaws and instead have their own apartment or house together. I think that's why it was referring to women, because the woman would be the ones usually moving into the home of the inlaws. So thats why it was specified. But yes, according to Akal Takht edict in 2007, a Sikh (male or female) must marry a Sikh. So a Sikh male can not marry a non-sikh female either via Anand Karaj. This came about after the protests of mixed faith marriages in Gurdwaras in UK in recent years. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragmaala Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 yupp Anand Karaj is only between two Sikhs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paapiman Posted March 19, 2016 Report Share Posted March 19, 2016 Quote accept the relationship of a hair-desecrator's daughter but never to reciprocate Unquote [1] [1] - Guru Kian Sakhian Bhul chuk maaf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.