Lalleshvhari your arguement hinges on the fact that there are seperate rehats for men and women.
Having just read a section of Prem Surag Granth (marriage section) it is mentioned that hte man and woman should take khanda da pahul together. Not kard da pahul or any other such bahman invention. Is a woman who takes Khanda Da Pahul, classified into the 3rd gender?
Women who leave their bodies as Waheguru created it will have a small amount of facial hair, usually upper lip. Since you believe Kesh is only on hte head and anything else can be shaved/plucked/pulled off, do women who leave their facial hair (as men leave their beard), become classified into this 3rd gender?
You claim that the turban is a masculine feature; what is your opinion on the Kaccha/Kachereh? Are not wearing knee length breeches a masculine thing?
Is a woman who adopts the Kaccha as part of the panj kakkars, classified into this 3rd gender of yours?
What about wearing of weapons - in "Classical Indian Society" or whatever you want to call it, women stay at home and cook. Would wearing of the kirpan constitute a classification into the dreaded "3rd gender"?
In the West, some women wear doo rags which are a little like turbans. Are they adopting the 3rd gender? If they lived in India where men wear turbans do they adopt the 3rd gender?
Some women also wear jeans, hooded tops, trainers, tracksuits etc. Going back 10 20 years these people would be classified also into the 3rd gender.
I remember reading something about jewlery and make up being ok on shastarvidiya.org..
Yet the Desa Singh Rehatnama which is constantly used to justify Jhatka, Sukkha and alcohol, also says, "do not wear makeup or jewelry".
Do you admit that Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhindranwales female family members adopted the 3rd gender, and if so, why did Baba Ji, being a Gurmukh of a high degree, and knowing exactly what Gurus hukam was, encourage them to wear dastar, when you claim Guru Gobind Singh would rather women stayed with their traditional roles?