Jump to content

singho

Members
  • Posts

    138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

singho's Achievements

  1. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LMAO
  2. Wow, impressive... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywmfs4dcpIY MLOL
  3. If you have a personal problem with me then take it over PMs rather than trolling your own 'sikh' fantasy forum, because I doubt readers here are interested in your pathetic attempts to sling mud or call me names. However, for the avoidance of any doubt, readers of this forum should note the following fact: I don't know this shaheediyan and have never met him. Neither does he know me. This is how the brave internet 'sikh' talks to complete strangers. I rest my case about UKPHA and its terrorist training camps at various locations around the UK. The officers of this organisation break the law on a daily basis and carry an arsenal of ILLEGAL offensive weapons wherever they train their sikh militant 'warrior' types. These weapons include: 1) A variety of swords; 2) An assortment of knives and daggers; 3) Fistload/punching accessories; 4) bagh nakh; 5) concealed blades in kamarkassa. Who cares what this shaheediyan says? Everyone who's been to these training camps knows it's the truth. It's self-evident when you go there, and the vicious array of weapons are laid out for the kuffars to prostrate to. The weapons he and his minions have carried there in breach of the Offensive Weapons Act, out on the streets. I rest my case about these training camps funded by central government and the National Lottery. FOLLOW THE MONEY and you will know the truth. Check YouTube for the khalistani 'Shere Punjab' and Google for 'boar's tooth and sikh'.
  4. Sure, whatever. As I mentioned, the classes are funded by a charity, which receives practically all its money from National Lottery fund and government grants. Have you checked these accounts? They are open to inspection. A little bit of research is all it takes to change someone's mind about this UK government front organisation. Why is the UK government funding martial arts training and anti-Muslim indoctrination for sikhs? Whatever the reason, it is distinctly unsavoury and highly questionable when these people turn up having formed criminal gangs and violently anti-Muslim and pro-Khalistan gangs such as Shere Punjab in the areas where the classes take place. Furthermore it's interesting the way that whenever someone raises a question about these so-called 'classes' on any internet forum, someone who recently signed up comes in and says: 1) he's no fan of Niddar's (bringing personalities into the debate); and 2) has the questioner ever been to any such classes? So tell me does this fellow advertise the accounts of his sponsor and his UK government controller to his students at his classes?
  5. Of course. This stuff is not secret despite that you probably wish it was. There is one organisation that trains sikhs around the UK once a week in how to stab, maim, hate Muslims, rape Muslim women with a boar's tooth and crap like that. We both know the organisation I'm referring to here. It is funded through a single organisation which is registered as a charity through the Charity Commission (for taxation purposes). All charity accounts are open meaning open books which any member of the public can check, and it just so happens that this malignant little cancer of a 'charity' is to all extents and purposes ENTIRELY funded by way of National Lottery and government grants. The other organisation which indoctrinates little khalistanis I mentioned almost by name in my post and is familiar to most UK sikhs. Again, a registered charity with open accounts visible by members of the public. In both cases, you or any other UK-based individual is capable of checking the "charity's" accounts. Mind your own business.
  6. No I shall not stop with this little campaign of mine, rest assured. I will bring to light the true nature of your hypocrisy. You claim to be a 'community' of 32 million, and yet you're split into a myriad little cults each one of which is at the others' throats, not even accepting them as 'sikh' (whatever that is). Your mysteriously invisible 'community' has only 3 or 4 popular web forums, on which you happen to be a frequent contributor. You enjoy massive government grants in exchange for complete acceptance of government policy from war in the Middle East to the treatment of homosexuals. When someone shows you up for the fraudulent QUANGO you are, you have the gall to consider yourself their master and shout them down, saying 'how dare you call yourself singho' and generally engaging in a viciously personalised smear campaign. Let's see.... Most of the gurdwaras in the UK are dependant on government grants and National Lottery. You take their money and you push your fake agenda under the cover of 'religion'. However, it doesn't stop there, does it?? Don't you also have your little training camps and organisations that preach hatred, violence and the acceptance of rape of Muslim women, 'teaching' this sick doctrine free of charge? FREE because it's funded by the blood-oil-money of the British government. Not just this, but 'Raj' organisations indoctrinating your youth in the ways of creating a viable sikh government, again funded by you-know-you in support of the Foreign Office's long-term campaign to destabilise the Punjab region and undermine the integrity of India. Stop creating terrorists and I'll stop showing up the holes in your boat. OK, so if you're not a liar then you tell me where did golestan or myself criticise the homosexuals? <Yawn> 1) Sharia law applies to all mankind and who does not accept is in defiance. 2) You're simply affirming my point that 'sikh' is really just an umbrella term used by the British government to mean someone who is docile and compliant to all policies of their white British imperial masters and at the same time like a faithful kuttah barking at the Muslim trying to explain the many deficiencies in your creed.
  7. He didn't say that. The fact that some other Shias of diverse non-Irani origins accept some National Lottery funding doesn't make your own position as a wholly-owned subsidiary of UK plc any stronger.
  8. YOUR guru, and anyway I don't 'insult' I 'refute'. Does your guru need your sikh empty macho posturing? Which of the Inns of Court and is there any particular reason for this location apart from your delusional fantasies? If you have something to say then discuss it here. None of your business. Stick to the topic or clear off with your fake doctrines and good luck to you. Did you want me to pass this on to the Bar Council? I am not responsible for your irrational 'phobia' of Islam. If you're suffering from such fear then perhaps you need to look at the gaping lacuna that is sikh jurisprudence and think again. I am not your enemy - your ignorance of Islam is. It is causing you to resort to foolish actions for want of reasonable arguments.
  9. What point? The fact that you are an almost completely government- and National Lottery-funded fraudulent astroturfing bandwagon in the UK is not negated in any way by the fact that other organisations professing to represent any other religion also take blood-oil-money from the same sources. It does NOTHING to add to your credibility. Hmmm... So you resort to making up lies to support your hollow clamour. It's not convincing. Neither myself nor golestan have given any fatwas anywhere whether it's about homosexuals or anyone else anywhere. Al-Qu'ran contains the truth and is the last word on all such matters. While we're on the subject, what does sikh say on the subject of homosexuality? Does it take any position whatsoever or is it a case of British government policy above all else (as usual)? What is the sikh law on what is to be done with homosexuals? If a Conservative government is voted in next time around, will you all harden your stance or will you still be quite gay about it?
  10. Important points: 1) YOU are not the arbiter of what is divine or what is not. 2) Islam affords women rights and clearly recognises the different roles played by men and women in society, unlike your religion which apparently just takes the latest guidelines from equality quangos as its guide to what 'equality' is. e.g. what are the current demographic statistics relating to male and female births in the Punjab, or outside Punjab in the sikh diaspora. The figures reveal the disgusting truth about the way you treat your women. You're having them aborted, killed in their infancy and now you are using gender clinics to weed them out. Does your 'religion' give women the right to divorce their husbands? Islam does. Does your 'religion' protect women from false accusations of infidelity? Islam does. Does your 'religion' afford any property rights whatsoever to women? Islam does. Let's look at this in a bit more detail, why not? What is a 'sikh wedding' and when and by whom was this ritual invented? Thanks in advance. Oh yes and I've been reading this kind of stuff on 'sikh' forums for years. X,Y,Z are not true sikhs, A,B,C are true sikhs. Who knows and more importantly who cares? Do you think the followers of these bizarre sects have any qualms about people on the internet deeming them not to be 'sikh'? What tripe.
  11. The fact that a person happens to live under a particular regime does not imply approval of all of his government's policies, and it never did. You seem to be advocating a sort of British totalitarianism of the mind, or to put it more succintly, a fascist system in Britain under which if you don't agree with the ruling class then you have to self-exile or be exiled. I'm sure it would suit most of you guys, as the traditional turbanned stooges of the British and heavily dependent on National Lottery and government grants. But it doesn't work for me.
  12. Why? Don't waste my time and the bandwidth of this forum with such pointless requests. The forum is slow enough as it is and hardly works because of all the posting and editing on this thread. See above. Yes. 1) I'm quaking in my boots LOL 2) If you hadn't been wasting my time by posting your pointless message you would have been able to see that I had responded to Xylitol's post a couple of minutes after he posted it. 3) If you persist with such time- and bandwidth-wasting irrelevent questions (e.g. do I know what date it is) I will simply ignore all your posts in the future and keep referring to this one, so you will need to create a new account to ask me anything. Capiche?
  13. Kindly indicate what I'm supposed to defend here. Al-Qu'ran is not manmade, and according to the passage you have quoted it is not manmade. It is always the supreme authority in Islamic jurisprudence. It is unquestionable that the knowledgable persons charged with interpreting this codex would have built up a system of precedents over time, but essentially the core of all sharia systems is the divine law as revealed in the Holy Qu'ran. Are you alleging that I implied that lawyers have some kind of divine status? If a scholar decides to interpret the Holy Qu'ran to determine how internet fraud should be dealt with, that doesn't mean he's inventing a manmade law from his own conception. He is using the faculties of an ordinary man to interpret divine law and apply it to a situation. Now kindly address my questions about sikh law, because I am keen to know the answers. Thanks a lot.
  14. I'm going to keep this simple enough for you to understand. You have no idea about the law. Any law that is written down has to be interpreted in order to be applied. The laws of sharia are derived from the spirit and the letter of the laws that were set down by the Holy Prophet (pbuh). The original law is from al-Quran and the ahadith, and interpretations are extrapolated from these original sources by people with knowledge. Where did I claim this? I said you are the one with no means to check the law. You don't even know what law is (i.e. where it comes from, and the need for any law manmade or otherwise to be interpreted in its application). I am hiding nothing.
×
×
  • Create New...