Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About sikhs2islam

  • Rank
    Nayana Bacha||Nayani Bachi

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Do you know what, I cant think of anything better than Bijla Singh actually revealing himself and having a discussion with muslims rather than just posting rubbish all over the internet. Ive also still yet to see any of my "blatant lies" refuted. Im willing to debate here or on my own forum, at least on my own forum the threads arent locked for no reason, where people on the forum here ran out of responses and arbitrarily locked the discussion!
  2. Interesting how people here now want to stifle debate, is it because they have no more answers left? With regards "You only want to convert people", what about Bijla Singh, who blatantly attacks islam all over the internet ,e.g :- "On the other hand, Islam does not teach equality. Islam teaches hatred, inequality and killing of those who do not believe in Islam and the Prophet Mohammad. Islam teaches that only Muslims, who believe in Mohammad being the last prophet, are superior beings to others. " "Non-muslims cannot even go to a mosque " "the God of the Muslims lives in the west"
  3. Hi Vijaydeep, long time! Please do continue the debate, I have still got to address your points as well, which I will do when I get time. Regards, Umar
  4. Hi All, After a short absence, the sikhs2islam website is back up. Check it on :- www.Sikhs2Islam.com Also, very disappointed to see my thread locked, I felt there was a lot of progress being made and i was not given the right of reply to SikhAnswers. Never mind, I will post it all on my website for people to read. regards, Umar, Sikhs2Islam.Com
  5. ISDhillon, did you not see what I wrote? I am going to respond, Im far from defeated, I just dont understand why there seems to be no progression. I will respond over the weekend, I have a job and dont have time to write 6,000 word articles every night, thats all. You know, its interesting that Ego And Pride were condemned by Guru Nanak, yet ISDhillon, Sikh Answers and Beetlejuice seem to have these in abundance!
  6. Sikh answers, Don't worry I will reply to your post, but I am failing to see the point. You are not listening to anything I am saying, going round and round in circles, and not adding anything to the debate! Your logic frightens me sometimes, as well as your criteria for proof. Its interesting as well that you take your sources from non-islamic sources. I ask you if I have ever presented "arguments" from anti-sikh websites? I have always gone as close as possible to the original source, with an open mind, to make sure I am quoting things correctly and have the correct, unbiased opinion.
  7. Answering Sikhs – Part Three An interesting discourse (“10 questions for Sikhsâ€) was responded to by the author of“answering muslims – part twoâ€, and It is also a point that the author seeks to digress the discussion into an attack on Islam, which is highly questionable as to the motives, seeing as this would upset the train of formal discussion. However, Islam, as always, has the answers, and all points raised will be responded to. I would argue that, contrary to accusations of being ignorant of sikh principles, I have understood them loud and clear, hence the worried context
  8. Sikh Answers, You can also see my reply to your responses, and you may also note that the bijla Singh article was written FIRST, in response to Searchsikhism and Bijla Singh. It is NOT the same article, as even a cursory glance will reveal. Im still waiting for your responses by the way.
  9. Point One ; Is Everyone Equal? Singhs’ first point is to contend that Sikhism is non-discriminatory, and that everyone should love each other as human beings, with no-one having a variable status, no-one being “high or lowâ€. His statement is as follows :- “In Sikhism everyone is equal. All people of different colour, religion, caste, creed, race and sex are equal in the eyes of God. No one is high or low. All are children of God created by God and God loves them all.†However, the Guru’s own teachings portray a different version of events. :- A. Concept of Khalsa Kha
  10. togood, you can see it pasted in another thread on the board, "response to bijla singh" which I will put up now
  11. Ok Mr Beetlejuice, Seeing as you’re determined to force the Shia / Sunni issue, even though it has no bearing on previous discussions within this thread, here you go. I have no idea why you want to discuss this, its completely pointless from the view of dialogue between Sikhs and muslims, but that’s fine, if this means that this post will end your incoherent rants, then so be it. I wonder if you are going to allow me to discuss your post, or will you use your tactic again of “if you’ve got a problem, take it up with them� 1. Shia Claims of Abu Bakr “stealing†inheritance
  12. toGood, You might want to read my response to Bijla Singh on that website. I have no problem advising people of other websites, as long as they're going to debate about them.
  13. toGood, You might want to read my response to Bijla Singh on that website. I have no problem advising people of other websites, as long as they're going to debate about them.
  14. To DSG, Hi there. My purpose for the ten questions ARE statements, and they are designed to encourage debate and dialogue with sikhs. I represent an organisation called Sikhs2Islam, of which we have members who are former sikhs who have become muslim. The purpose of these questions is twofold - A) To provide an antithesis to the propaganda against islam disseminated throughout the internet by Sikhs ( e.g SearchSikhism.Com, Bijla Singh, etc , etc ), and To raise serious questions about Sikhism in order to guide people the correct path, Islam. Therefore, thats my purpose. As to why d
  15. Dear Beetlejuice, Your inability to discuss and debate astounds me. Firstly, you paste Shia sources and expect everyone to accept them as truth, and yet when i paste other sources, you reject them., without even looking to the arguments. Secondly, you just cut and paste from other sites, without accepting responsibility for their contents. Thirdly, you type INVALID in BIG CAPS and then think that therefore makes your point. How foolish. I can debate with you on this forum in a seperate thread regarding Shia, but I dont think its fair to hijack this thread, thats all. Also, if you'
  • Create New...