i see similaritires between tibet/budhists and sikhs/panjab. just as the tibetans once ruled their own country and were a formidable force, they came to lose it and are now over-powered by the chinese. same as sikhs under King Ranjit Singh and now in a country where we have no political power.
the tibetans are hated by the chinese altho they portray themselves as caring for tibetans interest. same goes for india with the sikhs.
the chinese have flooded tibet so that they are becomng a minority in thier own country, sikhs are fast becoming a minority in panjab, partly becos they wanna move out to the western world and also other communites are willing to replace them in panjab.
chinese have tried to dilute the budhsits religion with thier own version of panchen lama, and the ravan hakoomat have interfered in sikh religion.
chinese have so ,much m,ilitry in tibet, as once india had in panjab. if a buddist disappears in tibet, it means nothing. if asikh disappears in panjab or india again it means nothing.
china claims to have brought prosperirty and culture to tibet. in reality they have brought bloodshed and hatred. india claims to have the intrests fo the sikhs at heart , whereas they have also brought murder and bloodshed.
china portrays people with legitimate requests as "splitists" whereas india portrays them as "extremists or separetists".
i only hope reaaly that india either dies quickly or that it relinquishes power to the people. same goes for china. and that those who killed the sikhs also face justice.
but on the realistic front, it probabaly wont happpen. still, they will have to face divine justice.