Jump to content

HarjasDevi

Members
  • Content Count

    427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

HarjasDevi last won the day on February 22

HarjasDevi had the most liked content!

About HarjasDevi

  • Rank
    Pradhan||Biba with Kainchi Vargi Zubaan

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

2,945 profile views
  1. I am more than unwelcome on what I did not realize was a hostile and hateful pro-Khalistani militancy forum. I actually thought sanatan Sikh sampradaya were welcome to post here as well as Hindus and Muslims. Kindly deactivate my account.
  2. My birth name is Muslim. Why would I want to hurt Muslims? A lot of communities got mixed up and messed up and unjustly treated through centuries of war and sectarian strife didn't they? All the same I don't support human rights abuses by anybody or against anybody... and I support a strong nationalist India that isn't broken into more Bangladesh-like states which actually do exterminate their minority populations. I enjoy Hindu religion, my ancestors were Hindu... because there are incredibly wise and beautiful teachings there... and would much rather be discussing those things rather than d
  3. Perhaps you could update me... did not Bajrang Dal respond in terrible fashion after jihadi's bombed a train and killed karsevaks? Again, isn;'t this ample evidence of foreign government manipulation of India to set off communities against each other? And why do you persist in blaming me for what they do? Hindu is a location name, an ethnicity is it not? And Sanatana Dharma is the actual religion. I never said Bajrang Dal were spiritual people. I even told in earlier thread RSS are among them, some drunkards even and vicious people of no religion,,, but also some are family men an
  4. It is sad what passes itself off as "Sikhism" these days. Khalistani jihadism is definitely not "Sikh."
  5. And the Khalistanis who lob grenades into prayer halls and shoot old men and old woman... they are SANT sipahis to you?
  6. Well, when you are the moderator whom I am reporting abusive insults to... then of course I would expect no less than more of the same. I will gladly take leave of such a vicious anti-Hindu, pro-jihadi forum masquerading as "Sikh" website. good luck with creating a Khalistan. doubt you will succeed in anything but getting a lot of Sikhs killed.
  7. I wasn't aware I was in a Court of Law and a responsible party required to prove the case? I have nothing to rely on other than what news media has reported about it and wasn't aware it was point of contention that Indira propped up Sant Bhindranwale against Akali Dal for Congress Party, and he went his own way. You "consider" ? You consider that jaggi is a murderer without any proof or conviction. By the same vein you must be a spy for the bajrangi terrorist brigade. You are propping up their lies and excusing their crimes on this forum. I am not the judge, the jury
  8. I'm just surprised that I receive sanction for replying to abusive comments, but abusive personal insults like these are allowed on what is supposed to be a "religious" website... no less such low insults are not even respectable for common websites. The more insults and slanders you sling, the more you cheapen this site... I'm sure they will delete your comments and ban me later and give me the blame. Nevertheless, what you spit out of your mouth becomes kalunk on your own face. I am what I am in the eyes of the Divine, no more and no less. Your opinion of me is meaningless... but it's unf
  9. I wasn't aware that unclear comment written by Jageera was owned by you as well. Now you call me "imbecile." Well there are articles about how Indira Gandhi propped up Sant Bhindranwale to weaken Akali Dal in Punjab and be her man, through her favorite son Sanjay, married to Sikh Moneka Kaur... which I consider a kind of political spy for Congress Party, but I concede he was a man of integrity and not corruptible by her. Perhaps you can explain to me how this is a lie?
  10. You should never call anyone a "cheap whore" it just shows your incredibly bad manners and hostility towards women. India's wheels of law turn incredibly slowly... it was the same for Hindu's accused of terrorist bombings as well, nothing "targeting Sikhs" here to arrest Jaggi for terrorism charges. That is not to say Sikhs have NOT been targeted, but those days are gone and it was shameful event in Indian history.. and BJP was not the cause of it. I'm sorry but horrible actions committed 30 years ago are not pressing agenda for any country... except israel which was created over fake victimiz
  11. Your thinking is so off not even sure where to begin. India never spent "billions of dollars to suppress Sikh faith." Indira Gandhi placed Sant Bhindranwale in a political position to be her spy. He was not corruptible like that and turned the tables on her, so early on she lost control of the situation in Punjab. She used Sikh General and Sikh Chief of Police to try to suppress the Pakistan and China funded secession movement of Khalistan but quickly made an even bigger mess of things. Originally, it was an act of suppression against independent state of Khalistan... so poorly implemented
  12. You must have missed the part where Thakur Dalip Singh Namdhari paid Khalistan Liberation Force to eliminate his rivals. You also left out the part where the pro-Khalistani guy "Jaggi" whom Chatanga1 was defending as an innocent victim is part of the investigation for funneling funds and intel to the 2 KLF shooters, and even provided the name of one of them, Ramandeep Singh (Canadian), and therefore implicated in terroristic mass murder plot. In my view, they are all "Sikhs" the problem though is the pro-Khalistani angle... which I criticize for several reasons, namely no r
  13. Chatanga1 calls me a whore, and I am making a drama... of course. Ban me if you want, I would expect no less from absurd anti-Hindu bashing site pretending to promote spirituality.
  14. And what exactly are you doing to HELP those FIRS of Sikhs viciously attacked in 1984 and unjustly beyond by police over-reach? Do you think "BJP" has a magic wand or that old issue of anti-Sikh pogrom from almost 30 years ago is pressing issue for government to focus on? It is issue for Sikh community to be sure, but... time moves on. Congress government did a lot of damage to those cases for a long time. New party is in power now. They are working on economy. But... you accuse me of "protecting killers of Sikhs" while sitting in my home. How do I do that exactly? The logic of it seems e
  15. I explained that Sant Nirankaris have not got history of going around blowing up people the way Khalistani militants have. That makes me inclined to view the Khalistani's as the aggressors since they have been so aggressive to everyone else... and Sant Nirankaris have not. What is "Hindutva rule" exactly? Some mythical Hindu's only state somewhere? Doesn't exist. And why shouldn't India with clear Hindu majority have democratic representation of majority in government? Who would you prefer "rule" in India anyway? Italian lady? Communists? Don't tell me, muslims Do you really
×
×
  • Create New...