cul

Yea because accusing someone of being an ass licker apologist because he doesn't want idiots like you cheering on the destruction of civil liberties is not playing the race card. Because, of course, if you're not a godless communist you must hate your own people. Defensive? Read the thread again and see who started with the ad hominem. I'm representative of the bankers? Really? No, Really?? After I posit that all insovlent banks should have been allowed to fail, that the fractional reserve system be abolished, that margin requirements be raised, that complex derivatives be regulated, that no government should have the right to issue 300% of its GDP as debt in order to spend billions of dollars on fatass idiots that don't want to work for a living and bailout loss making institutions? And you STILL think I'm making an argument FOR the current system? Are you really that stupid? (Don't answer). But of course you disagree, if I had my way you would find your fat ass out of your government issued house on the streets of southall with no government issued paycheck winging its way to your stupid ass to pay your satellite tv bill and finance an endless supply of take away.

Click the damn link, watch the first half hour - it'll describe the banking system, and stop making a fool of yourself, no matter how naturally it comes to you. You want big government and I'm the 'chamcha'? Right. Why do you dumbass Indians play the race card everytime some disagrees with you? Are you that insecure? (this is rhetorical, no need to answer. I'd assume you understood that but you don't exactly have a great track record.) If you have nothing useful to say then say nothing. My lack of bullshit on this forum is infinitely more useful than your constant stream of bile.

Easily the stupidest person I have ever come across. If you were not a retard, which sadly you are, you would have understood that in a truly free market system there is individual accountability and all the idiots that lent more money than they could afford and their counterparty idiots that borrowed more money than they could afford would have had to pay for their own mistakes. Instead, thanks to you and your commie boyfriends the debt has been socialised and we are all on the hook for it. Viva la revolucion. NB I was not talking about models. A capitalist system is capital based, which if you weren't an idiot you could figure out from the term. Our system is based on debt and exponential expansion of output and consumption, an idea first put forward by Keynes. We live in a Socialist-Keynesian system you absolute anus of a person. Ejumacate yourself, sucka

Actually, I was doing the opposite, but you were too stupid to understand. I don't hold it against you, you are just as much (possible more) a victim of your stupidity as we are. Take a guess, Einstein. Ever since you showed up this forum has turned into something to rival the daily mail for content. Bigoted in the other extreme, naturally.

OP all you do is link articles and gossip about people, have you nothing better to do?

is cbc right wing?

citizens of commonwealth countries are allowed to join the british army

Other than that sentence he has a point. There have always been Sikhs of varying degrees along the road to being Amritdhari, you can't draw a line in the sand and say that they are not Sikhs. By definition a Sikh is a student of the Guru, it doesn't have any other requirement. You cannot call them patit on the basis of shorn hair.

meh how is this thread any different from a gossip magazine anyway my comments about the news of the world stand, I said nothing about british people. My point was that if you want to make a point then quoting a shitty tabloid that has been sued multiple times for libelis probably not the best source. kdsingh80 how is this thread relevant to anything other than a desire to act superior

I don't think language is important to the thought process, most analysis is imo comparing and contrasting how you feel about different situations - anbhav if you will

No, I'm saying that 'the news of the world' is a tabloid that caters to the lowest common denominator and is practically a soft porn publication. It lacks any credibility. Remember that 'Brit' is not a race and is not confined to white people only, neither is 'Sikh' a race or confined to punjabis.

which says something about punjabis... given the source of the survey, the methodology probably consisted of interviewing 10 people on a council estate

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jIO5u2MVzs

The thing that annoys me is that if any of these ended up in court the people retaliating would get into more trouble than the chavs. When they get their asses kicked they go straight to the cops. The justice system in the UK is a joke regarding defence of personal space and property.

Indian first? Bunch of sissies. Would you put your country before Guru Sahib? I doubt that she is making a political point by marrying someone, why don't you ninnies mind your own business. She obviously wasn't 'happily engaged'. Make love not war etc