Intel Pentuim 4 3.2 GHZ Ht Review

[Guest]

Once again, Intel has decided to turn up the heat on their arch rival, AMD. In a sort of digital ying-yang, the battle for Performance Desktop and Workstation Processor leadership, presses on relentlessly. Like opposite yet mutual compliments, Intel releases the 3GHz P4 with 800MHz system bus and AMD lets fly with the Athlon XP 3200+. It's almost like nature intended it to be, isn't it? As Intel and AMD duke it out, in an effort to out class the competition, the end user community enjoys yet another incremental performance enhancement. Not to mention a nice cost reduction usually comes along, with what was formerly high end product now mainstream, due to these brisk product maturity cycles.

Our last look at AMD's latest product left us questioning AMD's performance rating somewhat. Although AMD's new Athlon XP 3200+ branding logically claims to have significantly better performance than the 3.0GHz P4, our testing showed that it was about on par with Intel's latest 3GHz chip, winning some and losing some, in various rounds of testing of our benchmark suites. This is the risk AMD runs, branding a product relative to performance, rather than an easily understood clock speed figure. Intel's approach however, on this new product release of the 3.2GHz P4 is pretty straight forward. It doesn't take a degree in Quantum Physics to understand that this new Pentium 4 is a full 1GHz faster that AMD's fastest Barton core at 2.2GHz for the Athlon XP 3200+.

However, the performance picture behind the clock speed, is the story that many of you come here to find out and that's what we'll aim to deliver for you today. At 3.2GHz, the new Pentium 4 is running a full 45% faster clock speed than an Athlon XP 3200+ at 2.2GHz. This is perhaps an impressive data-point and a tribute to Intel's ability to scale the P4 core to amazing new heights. On the other hand, as AMD likes to point out, it's not always about the MHz but how efficient a processor is within each clock cycle. We'll roll up our sleeves for you here and give you the straight scoop on that data-point as well.

Specifications of the Pentium 4 3.2GHz Processor

Another notch closer to the 4GHz mark

Clock Speed 3.2GHz

800MHz "Quad Pumped" Front Side Bus

Hyperthreading Technology for increased performance in Multi-tasking and Multi-threaded applications

.13 micron manufacturing process

512K on chip, Full Speed L2 Cache

Rapid Execution Engine - ALU clocked at 2X frequency of core

128bit Floating Point/Multimedia unit

"Hyper Pipelined" Technology for extremely high clock speeds

Intel "NetBurst" micro-architecture

Supported by the Intel® i875P and i865G chipsets, with Hyperthreading support

Internet Streaming SIMD Extensions 2

Intel® MMX™ media enhancement technology

Memory cacheability up to 4 GB of addressable memory space and system memory scalability up to 64 GB of physical memory

Support for uni-processor designs

1.55V operating voltage range

With 512K of full speed on chip L2 cache, an 800MHz Quad Pumped Front Side Bus, Hyperthreading, and 1.55V operating voltage, not much has changed for the new 3.2GHz Pentium 4, with the minor exception of an additional 200MHz in clock speed. In the die image on the right, you'll notice a couple of large rectangular dark grid regions on the right hand side of the die. These are the two banks of L2 cache memory. There is also a small block up in the top left quadrant of the shot. This is a block of what Intel calls "Execution Trace Cache", otherwise known as L1 cache.

As you'll note, the memory structures here take up a sizable portion of the die area. SRAM cache memory is big real-estate hog and you can understand why both Intel and AMD have to drive tighter process geometries, in order to support larger amounts of cache moving forward. Intel's Prescott Pentium 4 core, built on a 90 nanometer manufacturing process, is going to have a full 1Mb of L2 cache on board. Intel will also be one of the first to run 90 nanometer technology in high volume, when Prescott hits later this year.

[Guest]

I still prefer AMD Athlon's, i feel dat dey process more in less GHz den Intel counterparts.

[Guest]

I would prefer pentium. It can great with the games and high tech graphic programs.

Also if you plannin to host a web server or just a server... you defo need a intel .. amd proccesor will clog than compare to intel

[GABROO KHALISTAN DAH]

aummmmmmm

amd all da way floating point baby that makes int in c++ lingo eh n30 lol remember the days i asked u for help

[Guest]

man - im using a intel 600mhz - yrs old the most stressin thing i use the pc for is photoshop and macromedia flash.... n the processor handles everything pretty fast

my bros pc in the other room boots up in about 10 seconds :cry:

[Guest]

my bros pc in the other room boots up in about 10 seconds

thought of over-clockin your proccersor??

[Guest]

how do i do that?? :?

[Guest]

how do i do that?? :?

Here is the link for you.

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Manager/Ha...Q_20639840.html

scroll down for an anwser.

[joga singh]

Intel

[sikhprideuk]

i know this got nothink to do with this topic but the PLAYSTATION 3 coming out soon and from what iv been told its coming with a processor called the CELL which is ment to be crazy 1000 times faster then the playstation; Cant wait feel like a little kid

any1 else in to the playstation .. ISS PRO EVOLUTION Soccer is the Beezz knees