chatanga1 Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 bahadur, your equating dasam bani with this topic shows you are firing arrows in the dark. I know you are better than this. What is what sum1 duz whn they have no/incorrect answers? start saying" yeh but look at him !!". I know that as a scholar of many of many languages, religions etc, that you yourself knew as you typed these previous posts, that you were as i said b4 " firing arrows in the dark". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyhp32 Posted February 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Morghe, Nice try. I think the others posters have already said what I would have replied to your over the top comments. It's the height of idiocy to equate 1400 odd years of slavery and rape of female slaves to the Chritopakhyan. You have no answer to why a master can rape a female slave and have tried to bend and twist sharia ruling into order to prove that rape is not allowed when clearly it is. I think we should leave it here. Rape of slaves in allowed in islam the schools of jurisprudence state and no amount of argument by you will change that fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amardeep Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 I dont think that moderators on sa should ban anyone. this aint sikhsangat... anyhow sa is boring without bahadur.. there are hardly any good and deep topics during the times he aint here . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts