Jump to content

Slander Of Dasam Granth On Spn


singh2

Recommended Posts

I think he's clearly proven that slander is going on. There is no point of posting the above.

All the SPN team seems to be able to do, is resort to personal attacks. You guys love to divert attention don't you? :P

The post at # # is nothing but personal attack on me. Posting her views is anthonia who was anthonia till yesterday and became naryanjyot kaur in the evening. She is administrator for SPN. Surprisingly khalsa fauj a new favorite at SPN

is also posting. So it is well coordinated attack.

This is a typical example when one cann't counter other by arguements resort to personal attacks.That also reflects

cheap mentality of SPN people where bullying and vulgar language reigns supreme. such people are encouraged there.

This also reflects childish mentality of the poster who want to conform sikhism to their west aquired tastes. I have my Guru sahib by my side and I am not going to be deterred by such slander.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SPN team was just up to there hold tricks. Pressure a person into starting a debate (put a time restaint so its hard to collect the evidence in time) and then attack the person and don't even discuss the issue. Their best at putting words in your mouth. Also if they say its not slander then it's not slander.

One question that must be asked is, how much does the SPN team make by running the site and slandering Bani. Majority of them sit on there all day spreading their anti-Sikhi agenda. They must be making something or is done out of just pure hate.

First SPN will say Dasam Granth is false then Khalsa is false then these fanatics will start on Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji (which one of their mentors named Virinder Singh Grewal already has) just a matter of time the rest join in. I say these guys are worse than Badal. If you get compared to Badal you know your one terrible person. These guys are only their to put doubt and break people away from Sikhi. Just check these guys track record, they say you don't need faith in God. Now how ridicoulus is that.

Thanks to Inder Singh for exposing the SPN team even more to what they really are.

I just got some time to write my thoughts on this topic. SPN to get your answer for Sikhi. 5 thumbs down especially the SPN's team ability to understand Dasam Granth. Their horrible at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Randip

Stop beating about bush. What is your comment for the posts of Bhagat singh given here and reproduced.

The in the same thread Bhagat singh writes

dasam granth cannot be written by Guru Gobind Singh JI. Stop calling him the writer of this nonsensical piece of trash.

Khanda and Kirpan were present before Guru Gobind Singh.

Dont push it, now you will say Guru Gobind Singh worshipped Chandi! NONSENSE!----

10th Master and Amrit have nothing to do with that trash! Do YOU know anything about the concept of Khalsa??

And reply in light of post of tony aka dass007 given below

We also believe that the allegations are categorically untrue. We invite sikhwareness members to identify and list specific examples of slander found on SPN, naming the member, moderator or mentor who uttered the slander. You must also clearly state that you are responding to our invitation as a sikhwareness.com member. You will be required to provide the thread url and post number where the slander occurred. Slander is defined as words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another person. No multiple identities! Respectfully, the Admin at SPN

1) Where's the link? In anycase someone thinking Dasam Granth is not written by the 10th Master is not slander. It's called an opinion. Something you cannot seem to understand.

2) Guru Gobind Singh did not worship Chandi. You may think this but I do not.

Definition Slander:

slan·der (slndr)

n.

1. Law Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.

2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.

I really cannot see where slander is taking place apart from you Inder Singh.

Like I said look up Mcarthyism:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

QUOTE

McCarthyism is the politically motivated practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence.

QUOTE

Although McCarthy was officially censured by the Senate for misconduct in 1954 (most of his evidence was fabricated), his claims induced an atmosphere of suspicion and paranoia that destroyed many careers. The term has come to signify any type of reckless political persecution or witch-hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The post at # # is nothing but personal attack on me. Posting her views is anthonia who was anthonia till yesterday and became naryanjyot kaur in the evening. She is administrator for SPN. Surprisingly khalsa fauj a new favorite at SPN

is also posting. So it is well coordinated attack.

This is a typical example when one cann't counter other by arguements resort to personal attacks.That also reflects

cheap mentality of SPN people where bullying and vulgar language reigns supreme. such people are encouraged there.

This also reflects childish mentality of the poster who want to conform sikhism to their west aquired tastes. I have my Guru sahib by my side and I am not going to be deterred by such slander.

You have never attacked anyone have you?

You have never called anyone names?

Please stop this nonsense, at first I found you amusing. Now I am finding you just plain sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Where's the link? In anycase someone thinking Dasam Granth is not written by the 10th Master is not slander. It's called an opinion. Something you cannot seem to understand.

2) Guru Gobind Singh did not worship Chandi. You may think this but I do not.

Have you not read this? See below. Slander is very mild term for such abuse.Shame on you for lowering the standard of that forum to

gutter langage.

On Jan 17,2008 dasam granth and its history thread


Another member Bhagat singh writes Dasam granth bas piece of tarsh


The post parts are given below


There are parts of Dasam Granth that can be made into an adult video. The language used is very common, so when you read it, it sounds fine if you dont understand BUT if you understand it, you can't help but have a laugh at that piece of trash and wonder why people say Guru Gobind Singh would write such a thing!\


The in the same thread Bhagat singh writes


I don't know why... maybe...its because it's got porn in it! -----


dasam granth cannot be written by Guru Gobind Singh JI. Stop calling him the writer of this nonsensical piece of trash.

Khanda and Kirpan were present before Guru Gobind Singh.

Dont push it, now you will say Guru Gobind Singh worshipped Chandi! NONSENSE!----


10th Master and Amrit have nothing to do with that trash! Do YOU know anything about the concept of Khalsa??


-------------------------------------------------------------------

----

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have never attacked anyone have you?

You have never called anyone names?

Please stop this nonsense, at first I found you amusing. Now I am finding you just plain sad.

I am not deterred by such attacks. When mean people fall short of arguements they resort to such things.

But the point i am mentioning is the involvement of SPN administrator anthonia aka naryannyan kaur

in this vulgarity. Then SPN ropes in Khalsa Fauj on their side. This khalsa fauj is incidentally banned on most

of sikh forums except kala afghana sites.

Owner of SPN Aman singh warns khalsa fauj a couple of days ago for using dirty language and then ropes him in and thanks him for his dirty role.

Yet you call it a sikh forum. Sikhs do not use this type low language for others religious scriptures leave aside their on. And do not call it freedom

of speech. Freedom of speech does not apply to religious texts.

See warning of aman singh to khalsa fauj

http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/dasam-granth...sa-reply-2.html

Administrative Warning:

Dear The Khalsa Fauj, the language and manner in which you just posted in two threads is absolutely derogatory and unacceptable and such insensitive language towards any Sikh Scripture will not be tolerated at any cost. If you want to debate anything on Sri Dasam Granth, you are free to do without indulging in trash talk or bad or foul language. Messages filled with hatred will not make you sound more impressive than saying your message in simple and graceful language. SPN is not your personal battle ground. There are many such avenues already available with you.

Source:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=25493 (Booklet on Chandi Charitar(Shahbaz Khalsa), Reply to issues by Dalbeer Singh Ji)

Please consider this as your Final warning!

Best regards

Aman Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SPN team was just up to there hold tricks. Pressure a person into starting a debate (put a time restaint so its hard to collect the evidence in time) and then attack the person and don't even discuss the issue. Their best at putting words in your mouth. Also if they say its not slander then it's not slander.

One question that must be asked is, how much does the SPN team make by running the site and slandering Bani. Majority of them sit on there all day spreading their anti-Sikhi agenda. They must be making something or is done out of just pure hate.

First SPN will say Dasam Granth is false then Khalsa is false then these fanatics will start on Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji (which one of their mentors named Virinder Singh Grewal already has) just a matter of time the rest join in. I say these guys are worse than Badal. If you get compared to Badal you know your one terrible person. These guys are only their to put doubt and break people away from Sikhi. Just check these guys track record, they say you don't need faith in God. Now how ridicoulus is that.

Thanks to Inder Singh for exposing the SPN team even more to what they really are.

I just got some time to write my thoughts on this topic. SPN to get your answer for Sikhi. 5 thumbs down especially the SPN's team ability to understand Dasam Granth. Their horrible at it.

Only Five,

Guru Fateh.

You have a habit of lying which is not a Sikhi trait. Your above post is full of lies but one is the Mother of ALL lies.

You said:Just check these guys track record, they say you don't need faith in God. Now how ridicoulus is that.

Now, be a true Sikh and show to the members of this forum where on SPN it is mentioned what you claim. Post the whole thread so the cyber sadh sangat can see it.

Note to the Moderators:

It is your duty to check what a member of your forum is doing. If he is accusing people from another forum about something, then you all should demand the proof so that all can be aware and you can stand true to the name of your forum.

Tejwant Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inder Singh ji aka Singh2,

Guru Fateh.

We are all Sikhs and seek the truth and it is unbecoming on our part when we slip off the path of the truth.

The questions asked to you by Randip Singh ji :

You have never attacked anyone have you?

You have never called anyone names?

Please stop this nonsense, at first I found you amusing. Now I am finding you just plain sad.

Your response below does not answer any of the questions asked. Please be truthful and respond like a true Sikh.

Thanks

Tejwant Singh

I am not deterred by such attacks. When mean people fall short of arguements they resort to such things.

But the point i am mentioning is the involvement of SPN administrator anthonia aka naryannyan kaur

in this vulgarity. Then SPN ropes in Khalsa Fauj on their side. This khalsa fauj is incidentally banned on most

of sikh forums except kala afghana sites.

Owner of SPN Aman singh warns khalsa fauj a couple of days ago for using dirty language and then ropes him in and thanks him for his dirty role.

Yet you call it a sikh forum. Sikhs do not use this type low language for others religious scriptures leave aside their on. And do not call it freedom

of speech. Freedom of speech does not apply to religious texts.

See warning of aman singh to khalsa fauj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only Five,

Guru Fateh.

You have a habit of lying which is not a Sikhi trait. Your above post is full of lies but one is the Mother of ALL lies.

You said:Just check these guys track record, they say you don't need faith in God. Now how ridicoulus is that.

Now, be a true Sikh and show to the members of this forum where on SPN it is mentioned what you claim. Post the whole thread so the cyber sadh sangat can see it.

Note to the Moderators:

It is your duty to check what a member of your forum is doing. If he is accusing people from another forum about something, then you all should demand the proof so that all can be aware and you can stand true to the name of your forum.

Tejwant Singh

Waheguru seeker,

Singh ji has told very correctly. That is what you people do there. If you contest that i will prove by quoting posts

and show how you rig the whole process of so called discussion there.

You close the thread when someone is speaking against your ideology. After closing you allow your chosen ones to post.

This happened yesterday itself .

He is not accusing anybody he is speaking truth and baring your anti sikh ideology .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inder Singh, we will talk about all chariters during live debate. We will discuss chariter 21-23 and other ones. We will discuss horse chariter too. That is why live talk is best so bring your vidvaans to Toronto.

fauj

The above charitas are being discussed here. you are posting in wrong thread. See my post in other thread. I am asking reply from you.

After you reply i will give further details of your limitation in undestanding.

I suggest first learn the meaning of Chirtropakhayan before speaking anything on this.You thugs have a made s mockery of our religion without understanding

the subject you speak on. There are verses from these charitras that Giani ji speak to us while we have our anand karaj. I will show you everything when you engage

in discussion.

Read below and reply.

http://www.sikhawareness.com//index.php?showtopic=11557

To understand charitras 21,22 and 23 one should read charitras before that starting with charitra 2.

Upto charitra 20 a minister is reciting charitras where women are deceiving men. In beginning of Charitra 21

king asks minister now tell me a charitra where men have duped women. That is shown in charitra

21,22 and 23.

That itself is clear that it is a story( Fiction) being recited by a minister to his king. It is not real and hence

cann't be related to life of tenth master. Changing the name of places is an artistic expression to take the

story to great heights.

kala afghna sect follower khalsa fauj has different interpretation and he may tell us why he thinks that it

happened with Guru ji when the writer i.e. guru sahib is repeatedly telling in charitras that these are mantri-

bhup sambade.

Khalsa Fauj, where are you. Please ask your Guru kala afghana, ragi Darshan and jeonwala for help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru seeker,

Singh ji has told very correctly. That is what you people do there. If you contest that i will prove by quoting posts

and show how you rig the whole process of so called discussion there.

You close the thread when someone is speaking against your ideology. After closing you allow your chosen ones to post.

This happened yesterday itself .

He is not accusing anybody he is speaking truth and baring your anti sikh ideology .

Singh 2 aka Inder Singh and not letting other forums know who you really are when you post the same thing, not a Sikhi way,

Guru Fateh

Are you the spokesperson of Only Five?

The challenge is for Only Five. No one came to help you for the lies you told about SPN and could not prove a thing.

I know you call yourself one proud Jatt and you hate bhapas as you have mentioned to me through emails, which means you also hate all our GURUS who were also admin cut-edited but did not give a damn about this nonsense of caste system that you propagate. As you have no regards for our Gurus, then you also have NO REGARDS for SGGS, OUR ONLY GURU bestowed on us by our Dasam Pita. Only Hindus believe in and flaunt their caste system. So deep down, your actions show who and what you really are.

You just respond to the questions first that Randip Singh asked you that you copped our from, then we will go further.:-)

Thanks for the offer though but in Sikhi let the individuals have their say. DO NOT try to dominate others' interaction. That is very unbecoming of anyone,especially someone who calls himself a proud JATT where as there is no caste system in Sikhi.

Give Only Five a chance. He deserves it.

Tejwant Singh

Admin Note: Please not bring guru's maharaj into caste wars, by labeling them bhapas or rajputs out of context. As tejwant singh confirmed in the next line, they didn't care about caste nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singh 2 aka Inder Singh and not letting other forums know who you really are when you post the same thing, not a Sikhi way,

Guru Fateh

Are you the spokesperson of Only Five?

The challenge is for Only Five. No one came to help you for the lies you told about SPN and could not prove a thing.

I know you call yourself one proud Jatt and you hate bhapas as you have mentioned to me through emails, which means you also hate all our GURUS who were also Bhapes but did not give a damn about this nonsense of caste system that you propagate. As you have no regards for our Gurus, then you also have NO REGARDS for SGGS, OUR ONLY GURU bestowed on us by our Dasam Pita. Only Hindus believe in and flaunt their caste system. So deep down, your actions show who and what you really are.

You just respond to the questions first that Randip Singh asked you that you copped our from, then we will go further.:-)

Thanks for the offer though but in Sikhi let the individuals have their say. DO NOT try to dominate others' interaction. That is very unbecoming of anyone,especially someone who calls himself a proud JATT where as there is no caste system in Sikhi.

Give Only Five a chance. He deserves it.

Tejwant Singh

Calm down waheguruseeker ji. Seekers of waheguru do not get angry.

This is a discussion forum and discussion is open. In case you desire to have one to one discussion you can do it on PM.

Moreover you do not believe in discussion on Gurmat. All you do is bullying others and indulge in personal brawls.Let us not bring irrelevant topic of

Jatt and bhapa here. This caste system is rejected by our Guru sahibans. I l;ove my Gurus more than life and that is the raeson i was there to defend

bani of my Guru that you call hindutva writings.

had you regards for our dasam pita you would not have disowned His bani. All sikhs consider SGGS ji as our Guru. Do not tell lies as sikhs do not tell

lies. SEE my post below where i asked you to give proof where i wrote so and you ran away.

http://www.sikhawareness.com//index.php?sh...0&start=120

mr seeker where are you. This is second reminder from me to show where did i state that Sri Guru Granth sahib is not my Guru. Now you keep mum to hide your lies.


You are a liar and one of the the proofs of your lies is given below. This is question from you and below is reply from me. This is in addition to many assertions from me that do not lie on the status of Sri guru Granth sahib. Stop lying.


http://www.sikhawareness.com//index.php?showtopic=11496&st=0&start=0


I have already stated in reply to your false propaganda that Only and Only SGGS is eternal guru for all sikhs. no sikh disputes that. You want me to post the relevant post here. But propagandist like you keep on creating imaginary issues like this to earn an ear. Stop doing this as every sikh considers SGGS as Our Guru.


Nevertheless second most important scripture for sikhs is Dasam Granth. What is your view on this?

Waheguru seeker ji, can you please show me the post where i wrote like this?

Tell us how did you conclude that Dasam granth is hintutva Granth and those who defend that are hindus? Sangat will like to see your

reasoning for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

waheguruseeker ji

is this your post on SPN where you are calling dasam granth a Hindu granth?

http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/23...shan-singh.html



Tejwant calling others Hindus for respecting DG


Inder Singh ji,


I want to thank you for showing your true colors and your faith in Hinduism which is not a bad thing. Lots of Hindus are also members of this Sikh forum.


===============================================================


Tejwant calling believers in dasam bani as Hindutva


When these things about DG being the work of Guru Gobind Singh keep on cropping up by some whose agenda is nothing but deviate us from our only GURU- Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and add Hindutva into Sikhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singh 2 aka Inder Singh and not letting other forums know who you really are when you post the same thing, not a Sikhi way,

Guru Fateh,

Thanks for admitting that you believe in caste system and call yourself a proud Jatt and hates Bhapes, our Gurus.. All this shows the kind of person you are.

Once you have stopped lying then we will talk Gurmat. It is You who has refused to give the meanings of Gurbani from SGGS when urged many times, which shows a lot more about you.

Tejwant Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vahigeguruseekr,

I would like to point and reconfirm that inder singh user id is already been taking by someone on this forum. Hence he couldn't use his real name on the forum. I have read you accusing inder singh for not using his name many times on numerous threads on this forum. Can we please move fwd and leave that accusation aside as it holds no water?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singh 2 aka Inder Singh and not letting other forums know who you really are when you post the same thing, not a Sikhi way,

Guru Fateh,

Thanks for admitting that you believe in caste system and call yourself a proud Jatt and hates Bhapes, our Gurus.. All this shows the kind of person you are.

Once you have stopped lying then we will talk Gurmat. It is You who has refused to give the meanings of Gurbani from SGGS when urged many times, which shows a lot more about you.

Tejwant Singh

Waheguruseeker ji

PLease do not involve personalities in discussion on Gurmat. Discussion ishould be issue based and not personality based. Persons

like you and me are mortals. They will keep on coming and fading into oblivion with time.

I reject caste system. I love my Gurus more than my life.

Let us have your views why you hate Daam granth sahib. At the same time you say you are Amritdhari. What banis you read in nitnem.

i asked this question there a number of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vahigeguruseekr,

I would like to point and reconfirm that inder singh user id is already been taking by someone on this forum. Hence he couldn't use his real name on the forum. I have read you accusing inder singh for not using his name many times on numerous threads on this forum. Can we please move fwd and leave that accusation aside as it holds no water?

N30singh ji

Thanks for clarifying that. I have told this to him a no of times.But he just sidesteps that and continues personal baragae of bullying.

May i ask why he was using different ids like waheguruseeker, roadrunner, roadrunner2 etc etc. So these are filmsy issues to derail the

discussion.

Waheguruseeker ji

Let us know your views why you call Dasam granth Hindu Granth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lucifer's beard! Is this thread still running?

The acceptance of Dasam Granth as bani is a fundamental pillar of Sikhi. You cannot be a Sikh and say that you are sitting on the fence scratching under your joora until you decide that you believe in it, no more than you can be a Sikh and say, Well, you know, I believe in Sri Guru Granth Sahib but not those parts that I don't like. Study of Dasam Granth should be undertaken to understand why this Granth was written and what purpose it serves, not to pick and choose the bits that go well with your own personal philosophy and declare these and only these shabads to be dhur ki bani.

Someone wake me up when it's all over.

K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

waheguruseeker ji

is this your post on SPN where you are calling dasam granth a Hindu granth?

http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/23...shan-singh.html


[b]

Tejwant calling others Hindus for respecting DG


Inder Singh ji,


I want to thank you for showing your true colors and your faith in Hinduism which is not a bad thing. Lots of Hindus are also members of this Sikh forum.


===============================================================


Tejwant calling believers in dasam bani as Hindutva


When these things about DG being the work of Guru Gobind Singh keep on cropping up by some whose agenda is nothing but deviate us from our only GURU- Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and add Hindutva into Sikhi.

Inder Singh ji,

Gur Fateh.

You believe in caste system. You call yourself a proud Jatt and for you Bhapes are inferior to your Jatt caste. Our Gurus although, none of them Jatt never believed in any nonsense of caste system. In fact they rejected caste system unlike you. In case you did not know, Sikhi was based on that premise.

Sikhi does not believe in caste system. Hindus do. Hindus believe in Hindu mythology and do not believe in SGGS as you do not that is why you have not been able to give the meanings of the Shabads when urged repeatedly. You did not even know that Rehat was explained in SGGS till you were given the panna numbers.

So anyone who believes in caste system and flaunts his caste is NOT a Sikh but a Hindu. So you are a Hindu for me who is trying to insert Hindutva in Sikhi without any proof that Guru Gobind Singh ji wrote DG.

Now, respond to Randip Singh ji's questions.

Tejwant Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vahigeguruseekr,

I would like to point and reconfirm that inder singh user id is already been taking by someone on this forum. Hence he couldn't use his real name on the forum. I have read you accusing inder singh for not using his name many times on numerous threads on this forum. Can we please move fwd and leave that accusation aside as it holds no water?

N30 ji,

Guru Fateh.

I understand that part but if you notice whenever he posts something eg on Sikh Sangat or other forums, then he posts the URL here without telling anyone that he is the original poster. It has happened several times which is nothing but deceit. That was my point of hiding ID. And as far as my various ID's are concerned, please let Inder Singh know that I always use my name at the end of every post unlike him.

Regards

Tejwant Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguruseeker ji

PLease do not involve personalities in discussion on Gurmat. Discussion ishould be issue based and not personality based. Persons

like you and me are mortals. They will keep on coming and fading into oblivion with time.

I reject caste system. I love my Gurus more than my life.

Inder Singh ji,

Guru Fateh.

LOL. Look who is talking? You have done nothing but used personalities in the discussions and lied about them. When challenged , you are quick to change the subject. Read your own posts to find that out.

You are not able to have any Gurmat discussion because you have no idea what SGGS says. You, yourself have admitted that by not providing the meanings of the Shabads that you love to copy and paste despite my urgings.

You are lying again about rejecting caste system as you have lied about many things especially about SPN and its members. You have flaunted your Jatt caste many times and also told that your family belongs to the Jatt caste since the times of Gurus. At this age of 82,please stop lying and start studying SGGS so you can share the meanings of the Shabads when requested. SGGS is our ONLY GURU as bestowed to us by our Dasam Pita.

Tejwant Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inder Singh ji,

Gur Fateh.

You believe in caste system. You call yourself a proud Jatt and for you Bhapes are inferior to your Jatt caste. Our Gurus although, none of them Jatt never believed in any nonsense of caste system. In fact they rejected caste system unlike you. In case you did not know, Sikhi was based on that premise.

Sikhi does not believe in caste system. Hindus do. Hindus believe in Hindu mythology and do not believe in SGGS as you do not that is why you have not been able to give the meanings of the Shabads when urged repeatedly. You did not even know that Rehat was explained in SGGS till you were given the panna numbers.

So anyone who believes in caste system and flaunt their caste are NOT Sikhs but Hindus. So you are a Hindu for me who is trying to insert Hindutva in Sikhi without any proof that Guru Gobind Singh ji wrote DG.

Now, respond to Randip Singh ji's questions.

Tejwant Singh

Waheguruseeker ji

Have you got anything else other than personal attacks. I believe in

Manas ki jaat sabe

Eko pehchanbo

Instead of harping on phoney issues like a child in elementary class try to debate issues involved.

You wrote

Sikhi does not believe in caste system. Hindus do. Hindus believe in Hindu mythology and do not believe in SGGS as you do not that is why you have not been able to give the meanings of the Shabads when urged repeatedly. You did not even know that Rehat was explained in SGGS till you were given the panna numbers.

-------So you are a Hindu for me who is trying to insert Hindutva in Sikhi without any proof that Guru Gobind Singh ji wrote DG.

You are right sikhi does not believe in caste system. You are indirectly telling above that dasam granth promotes Hindu mythology. This is mischievious statement. Dasam Granth condemns Hindu mythology in a much harsher terms than SGGS ji. Please show where Dasam granth promotes Hindu mythology.

Again can you show us where SGGS ji talks about khalsa rehat? THis topic came up earlier and Kalyug veer ji corrected you.

I never flaunted my caste. It is you who falunts that especially when you send private hate emails siging off as teji Malik.

Did you find my name with a caste affiliation?

What proof you have that Guru Gobind singh ji did not write Dasam granth sahib.

Finally you have bared your agenda. You are not a sikh if you do not believe in Dasam granth sahib. You are like a Sindhi hindu

who believes in SGGS ji but do not believe the teachings of tenth master. They do mundan and smoke cigarettes.

Since you have no scholarship in dasam granth only thing you will do is to sidetrack the topic by personal issues.

Tell us what made you conclude that dasam granth is not written by tenth master?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

N30 ji,

Guru Fateh.

I understand that part but if you notice whenever he posts something eg on Sikh Sangat or other forums, then he posts the URL here without telling anyone that he is the original poster. It has happened several times which is nothing but deceit. That was my point of hiding ID. And as far as my various ID's are concerned, please let Inder Singh know that I always use my name at the end of every post unlike him.

Regards

Tejwant Singh

How do we know that waheguruseeker is real ID as it has been changing from time to time roadrunner , road runner 2 , waheguruseeker etc etc. Now you admit that.

I have expalined to you that i registered here as inder singh2 as there was another Inder singh already on this forum.Do you want the reference of that post.

get out of ID phobia and let us know why you hate Dasam bani? Is it because it is a hurdle for easy life style?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguruseeker ji

here is the same qusetion i asked you from another forum member.Please reply that so sangat can know your credentials.

http://www.sikhawareness.com//index.php?showtopic=11557

What I want to know is, if Waheguruseeker is an Amritdhari then what banis does he read for his Nitnem? Since he discards all of Dasam Granth as a Hindu Granth then does he not read Jaap sahib, Swaiya, Benti Choupi and Dasam Bani in Rehras Sahib and Ardas? What kind of an Amritdhari is he? He is going against the Panthic Maryadha of Akal Takht which includes Dasam Bani in Nitnem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...