HarjasDevi Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 chu kar az hama helteh dar gujast halal ast bardan ba shamsheer dast (zafarnama) when all means have failed it is justifiable to draw the sword.... YOU WROTE If anyone is destroying Sikhism, it isn't open debate, analysis and the freedom to correct and contradict. But the people who are acting like thugs and bullying all viewpoints which disagree with them by baiting, threats, personal slanders, attacks and intimidation. I SAY "you fit in this category cuz you have been clearly diproved on everything you say yet you cant accept it" YOU LACK BASIC ANALYSIS SKILLS AND TO TALK TO YOU IS LIKE TALKING TO A BRICK WALL At least I don't go around making retarded death threats over a disagreement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuptSingh1699 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 This Maryada is of SGPC 1920s-1930s. Ardaas before was done without Chandi Di Vaar stanzas too A Gutka from 1927 proves that! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mithar Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 This Maryada is of SGPC 1920s-1930s. Ardaas before was done without Chandi Di Vaar stanzas too A Gutka from 1927 proves that! Chandi Dhi Vaar was always a part of the Ardas during and after Singh Sabha movement, not surprising since Singh Sabha leaders themselves were believers in Dasam Bani. Only the Bhasourias were not believers. That Gutka must be a Bhasouria Gutka. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chakarvarti Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Out of curiosity what is the ardas in that gutka? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.