Science And Islam:

[Genie Singh]

[REMOVED]

Edited December 10, 2015 by JatherdarSahib

[Genie Singh]

[REMOVED]

Edited December 10, 2015 by JatherdarSahib

[laalsingh]

As Islamic knowledge and technology was used to conquer India.

Wrong. It was brute force and hate for kafirs.

[Genie Singh]

[REMOVED]

Edited December 10, 2015 by JatherdarSahib

[Amarjeet Singh_1737]

Islam has no original science. It basically adopted Greek, Roman and Hindu ideas.

[Not a Blind Follower]

Download e Islam Explorer from play store... There are over 200 miracles mentioned Including the formation of an embryo in the mothers stomach! .. All this mentioned 1400 years ago kind of got me thinking...

[chatanga1]

There are over 200 miracles mentioned Including the formation of an embryo in the mothers stomach!

There was nothing new in this "revelation" even 1400 years ago.

[Amarjeet Singh_1737]

There was nothing new in this "revelation" even 1400 years ago.

The works of Amos, and other pre-Islamic individuals were used and explained away as divine miracles.

[Jonny101]

Daulat Rai was right for the fact that Hindus(and India) was enslaved by the Muslims because Hindus were too divided amongst different sects, castes, Gods, scriptures. Muslims had unity of their faith. They believed in one God, one Koran and one Ummah. In Punjab at least it took the Sikhs who were also similarly united in the belief in One God, One Guru Granth Sahib and One United Panth against an external enemy. When Muslims would declare their Jihad, Sikhs in turn would declare a Dharm Yudh. Their Ghazis were no match for the Sant Sipahi Khalsa Sikhs. Muslims had finally met their match in every way.

Even now, Hindus of India should embrace Sikhi. It is in the best interest of India and will make India stronger

[Genie Singh]

[REMOVED]

Edited December 10, 2015 by JatherdarSahib

[GtLoc]

Daulat Rai was right for the fact that Hindus(and India) was enslaved by the Muslims because Hindus were too divided amongst different sects, castes, Gods, scriptures. Muslims had unity of their faith. They believed in one God, one Koran and one Ummah. In Punjab at least it took the Sikhs who were also similarly united in the belief in One God, One Guru Granth Sahib and One United Panth against an external enemy. When Muslims would declare their Jihad, Sikhs in turn would declare a Dharm Yudh. Their Ghazis were no match for the Sant Sipahi Khalsa Sikhs. Muslims had finally met their match in every way.

Even now, Hindus of India should embrace Sikhi. It is in the best interest of India and will make India stronger

Two common misconceptions here:

First that india offered little resistance, first look up battle of baraich as an example.

Second, of the universality of hindu faith.

Parts of the south, gujurat, parts of rrajasthan etc. We're the centre's of hindu dharam.

Many areas like Biharis were bhuddist, as well as afghanistan.

A

Many groups stuck to traditional religion, forsaking the Vedas. Yeah, they became shudra but Americans are shudra what say o bramins have their?

This is how kashmir became muslim:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rinchan

Many people were never hindu, so in fact when many hinduvta say the ancestors of Sikhs of Muslims were hindu, many weren't. Especially in the case of Sikhs.

It is distorting history, to say that the khalsa singlehandedly saved the weaklings of India.

Even many 'bbramins' have military feats that are much above American soldiers crying in Iraq.

http://www.historynet.com/battle-for-chitor-storming-the-last-hindu-fortress-in-1567.htm

Those are relatives of mine, as is rana pratap which is why I know of them. You can't call them coward, and the purataan khalsa wrote about bhim, etc. And the difference.

The difference is what onion others use a hammer to crush, the khalsa uses its hands.

Where there is a single brave warrior, there are 96,000,000 Khalsa.

The difference is one of ability, not valour.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਹਿ | |