kdsingh80 Posted August 25, 2015 Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/muslim-population-grows-marginally-faster-census-2011-data-show/article1-1384095.aspxThe NDA government on Tuesday released the data on population by religious communities from Census 2011 which showed the proportion of Muslims to the total population is growing marginally faster than that of other religions. Critics questioned the timing of the release of the data just weeks ahead of polls in Bihar, where Muslims can influence the outcome in about 50 of the 243 assembly constituencies. According to an official statement, the proportion of Hindus in the population has declined by 0.7 percentage point, Sikhs by 0.2 percentage points and Buddhists by 0.1 percentage points during 2001-2011. The proportion of Muslim population to the total population of 121.09 crore increased by 0.8 percentage points. There has been no significant change in the proportion of Christians and Jains. This is the first time that the proportion of the Hindu population has fallen below the 80% mark. The data were released by sex and residence up to sub-districts and towns. Of the total population in 2011, the number of Hindus was 96.63 crores (79.8%); Muslims 17.22 crores (14.2%); Christians 2.78 crores (2.3%); Sikhs 2.08 crores (1.7%); Buddhists 0.84 crores (0.7%); Jains 0.45 crores (0.4%), Other Religions and Persuasions (ORP) 0.79 crores (0.7%) and Religion Not Stated category 0.29 crores (0.2%). The growth rate of population during 2001-2011 was 17.7%.The growth rate of population of the different religious communities in the same period was: 16.8% for Hindus; 24.6% for Muslims; 15.5% for Christians; 8.4% for Sikhs; 6.1% for Buddhists and 5.4% for Jains. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdsingh80 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 Terrible blow to sikhism , declining from 1.9 to 1.7 percent of population. 10% decline percentage wise 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amardeep Posted August 25, 2015 Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 Sikhi will become minority religion in Punjab soon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 25, 2015 Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 What you guys think cause of this decline in punjab itself? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdsingh80 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 What you guys think cause of this decline in punjab itself?low birth rate, people following dera's hence they are calling themselves non sikhs, inter religious marriages particularly by women and their children are non sikhs 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amardeep Posted August 25, 2015 Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 What is the reason of growth amongst Muslims? conversions or high birth rates? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdsingh80 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2015 What is the reason of growth amongst Muslims? conversions or high birth rates?high birth rate, majority lives in UP Bihar which has highest birth rate in India,more than one wife. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pakistani Jatt Posted August 26, 2015 Report Share Posted August 26, 2015 You Sikhs were always minority.In 1947 you were 13% minority only and if you include Pakistani Punjab, Haryana and Himachal it shows that it was only partition that barely got you a small majority. You will probably have to partition your small east Punjab again in future to keep a Sikh majority.Remember for every one Punjabi Sikh we Punjabi Muslims are six times more population. Even word Jatt should be associated with Muslims as we are the majority of Jatts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amardeep Posted August 26, 2015 Report Share Posted August 26, 2015 You Sikhs were always minority.In 1947 you were 13% minority only and if you include Pakistani Punjab, Haryana and Himachal it shows that it was only partition that barely got you a small majority. You will probably have to partition your small east Punjab again in future to keep a Sikh majority.Remember for every one Punjabi Sikh we Punjabi Muslims are six times more population. Even word Jatt should be associated with Muslims as we are the majority of Jatts.Thats true. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post paapiman Posted August 26, 2015 Popular Post Report Share Posted August 26, 2015 You Sikhs were always minority.In 1947 you were 13% minority only and if you include Pakistani Punjab, Haryana and Himachal it shows that it was only partition that barely got you a small majority. You will probably have to partition your small east Punjab again in future to keep a Sikh majority.Remember for every one Punjabi Sikh we Punjabi Muslims are six times more population. Even word Jatt should be associated with Muslims as we are the majority of Jatts.Agreed, we were minority, but look at our sacrifices in liberating Punjab from foreign occupation and then in India's freedom struggle. You will be amazed.God's power can turn a majority into a minority in a few moments. Bhul chuk maaf 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Crystal Posted August 26, 2015 Popular Post Report Share Posted August 26, 2015 (edited) Yes Pakistani jatt. .but your ancestors are cowards who kneeled before the mughalss and Afghans. Your ancestors were coward Hindus is nce the first invasion of panjab by sulleh .You let maleech rape and take your women....haha what a soorma jatt, vah ve vah. You had raised arms to invaders whereas us Sikhs of kalgidhar hadhad raised khandas and shastar. Akal Akal Akal Akal Akal AkalCrystal Edited August 26, 2015 by Crystal 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crystal Posted August 26, 2015 Report Share Posted August 26, 2015 Not forgetting how your beloved Pakistani army has been ass raped by us Indian fauj ha. Pity on your pathetic nation of "soorma Punjabi's". Losers. Ps don't forget about how probably your great great great gran bent over to receive a mughal . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdsingh80 Posted August 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2015 You Sikhs were always minority.In 1947 you were 13% minority only and if you include Pakistani Punjab, Haryana and Himachal it shows that it was only partition that barely got you a small majority. You will probably have to partition your small east Punjab again in future to keep a Sikh majority.Remember for every one Punjabi Sikh we Punjabi Muslims are six times more population. Even word Jatt should be associated with Muslims as we are the majority of Jatts.I think then Punjabi should be official language of pakistan and Pakistan should have been considered punjabi country. but wait I think I am wrong here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsingh101 Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) Pak-jatts have done eff-all for Panjab or Panjabi culture. They haven't even been able to make the language respectable in that cess pit of theirs - even though they are a majority.... Then, over here in the UK, paks in general have gone and ruined the 'Asian' reputation with their rampant pedophilia....wah ve wah... neech quom. Edited August 27, 2015 by dalsingh101 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pakistani Jatt Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 Our population has the highest percentage of high castes (forward castes in studies).Studies show its Buddhists followed by Sikhs who have the highest percentage of low caste followers.So if anyone is neech ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsingh101 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 Our population has the highest percentage of high castes (forward castes in studies).Studies show its Buddhists followed by Sikhs who have the highest percentage of low caste followers.So if anyone is neech ... F**k that.Rather have 'low castes' than hordes of paedophiles like your lot.... lolAnyway Abdul. I thought your lot didn't believe in caste? Is it your Hindu antecedents showing up? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsingh101 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 That's all we need now: Paks turning up with their two rupees worth.....The thought of me (or ANY Sikh for that matter) going to a Pak forum and doing the equivalent of what sullay try to do on Sikh forums is embarrassing.Some people have no shame. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pakistani Jatt Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 Islam has never opposed noble birth.The Prophet (pbuh) was from the highest Qureshi lineage (Hashemite).Indeed through the cousin marriage you oppose we preserve the purity of our qaum's bloodline more than you. Jatts, Rajputs, Gujjars, Butts are quoms. Its you people who have castes which are occupation based. Jatts, Rajputs, Gujjars are tribes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsingh101 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 Islam has never opposed noble birth.The Prophet (pbuh) was from the highest Qureshi lineage (Hashemite).Indeed through the cousin marriage you oppose we preserve the purity of our qaum's bloodline more than you. Jatts, Rajputs, Gujjars, Butts are quoms. Its you people who have castes which are occupation based. Jatts, Rajputs, Gujjars are tribes.F**k you and your bullshit. If I wanted to learn about Islam I'd go to a sullah site.Anyway, your jaat is officially a 'scheduled class' now. End of story. You can act like pendu royalty on your side of the border. lolPak, seriously why you bothering us? [Rhetorical question]. Go on some sullah site and tell them how great pendu jats are THERE. Spare us. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pakistani Jatt Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 That might be on your side of the border Dal Singh.But Muslim Jatts were the last ruler of united Punjab, Sir Sikander Hayat Khan, the first Prime Minister of Pakistan, Liaquat Ali Khan and conceptualised Pakistan like Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan.Your population declines while we Pakistani's are now 200million 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JungChamkaur Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 Coward ancestor hindus? Like the ones who defeated afghans more than all minuscule sikh history combined? have you losers ever read anything outside the pathetic false history preached in your pathetic gurdwaras? Jaipur defeated afghans and their flags bear the mark of victory... bhai khan maral was actually allied with him... rajputs invaded the border many times and protected punjab under mughal suzerainty... similar to sikhs at the border at saragarhi. and the same coward hindus youre talking about defeated ranjit: brahmins and rajputs from bihar... chamkaur di garhi and machiwara were safe havens for the guru because they were owned by ghorewaha hindu rajpoots. ranjit and his nobles were all hindus anyways, their flags are evidence but perhaps you should stick to your new flags imposed on you by british sponsored singh sabhas which are also bearing the mark of shiv shakti and hinduism... you loser jatts ruined sikhi and now its diminishing. perhaps you should cry about bhagat singhs family being arya samaji and 100% hindu sikhs and babbar akalis like karam singh daulatpur being 100% hindu. babbar akalis in doaba came to my house dozens of times and the majority of jatts in nawanshahr still do... wake up. and if you want to confirm this then lets plan a meeting in india, bring your damdami taksal to our side and say what you say here and youll run away like the coward khadkus did or get saved by the benevolent hindu rajputs of punjab as you did in the 80s.. if that doesnt suffice, dont worry, we have many more beants waiting for you to come home like the bakra on eid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JungChamkaur Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 sikhs acting as if theyre some types of sardars making up fake history like losers . learn how to read, punjab is only bordering khyber pakhtunkhwa... how about balochistan and sindh? talpur and abbasi muhammadans and balochis? you ever come across the rajput kingdoms who defeated them dozens of times... or ghagho rana who was 90yrs old and gave balidan at somnath? hindu history includes khalsa history. sikhi only gets separated once dulip is sent away and singh sabha begins to challenge the dominant sikhi of ranjit to protect the interests of cis-sutlej states.. its no wonder why their descendants still run punjab and were sponsors of singh sabha whilst being traitors of punjab... you losers cant even connect basic dots like that.. hell youre still coping with guru nanak naming his son laxmi..... and guru tegh bahaur naming his son govind.. and guru har rai naming his son harkrishan and his wife being named krishan devi. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jungchamkaur_ka_baap Posted September 15, 2015 Report Share Posted September 15, 2015 Pathetic gurudwaras ? admin cut you and your dirty mandirs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paapiman Posted September 16, 2015 Report Share Posted September 16, 2015 and the same coward hindus youre talking about defeated ranjit: brahmins and rajputs from bihar... Are you talking about Maharaja Ranjit Singh? When was he beaten?Bhul chuk maaf 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdsingh80 Posted September 16, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2015 sikhs acting as if theyre some types of sardars making up fake history like losers . learn how to read, punjab is only bordering khyber pakhtunkhwa... how about balochistan and sindh? talpur and abbasi muhammadans and balochis? you ever come across the rajput kingdoms who defeated them dozens of times... or ghagho rana who was 90yrs old and gave balidan at somnath? hindu history includes khalsa history. sikhi only gets separated once dulip is sent away and singh sabha begins to challenge the dominant sikhi of ranjit to protect the interests of cis-sutlej states.. its no wonder why their descendants still run punjab and were sponsors of singh sabha whilst being traitors of punjab... you losers cant even connect basic dots like that.. hell youre still coping with guru nanak naming his son laxmi..... and guru tegh bahaur naming his son govind.. and guru har rai naming his son harkrishan and his wife being named krishan devi. Undivided India is now 34% muslim, you talk as if 34% Hindu's are living Saudi arabia..No doubt many hindu quoms were brave, but none of these quoms presented a united front to muslims.There is very little difference between extreme bravery and stupidity 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.