Guest Javanmard Posted May 1, 2004 Report Share Posted May 1, 2004 The articles are outdated and inaccurate. None of the author refer to puranic mythology quoting original sources and theoretical writings on mythography (Dumezil, Eliade, Corbin). This is ideology not scholarship and has hence no scholaristic or academic value. These articles are full of sentential ideological pre-assumptions and are not based on a traditional hermeneutical reading. Try harder! Rattan SIngh Jaggi's book is a joke as he quotes only 4 or 5 major historical sources which for a PhD on the subject is unacceptable! Anyone doing PhD knows that this is amateurish scholarship! I still have to see a single book that is worth being considered valid for an anti-Dasam Guru Granth argument! My experience with people who criticise Dasam Guru Granth Sahib for its puranic content don't know Sanskrit or classical Indian literature properly and I know a lot of scholars! It's a joke!!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.