Jump to content

Being a SIKH, what is our duty?


survivor
 Share

Recommended Posts

ssa ji

im new here! sukh frm uk

my msg is can a hair - cut singh claims he is a sikh?

in my view NO

i wear a pagh and everyday i tigh it i kiss the lar. keep a full dhari! proud of my sikhi korm!

there is a hugh debate what a sikh is?

this guy claims eating beef is hindu's saying not sikhi and other one claims not wearing a pagh singh is very religious!

they so called sikhs need educating!

http://rdb.proboards5.com/index.cgi?board=general

in this board there are ppl who claim what sikhism is all about

the names are

deepz

little miss kaur

sum singh

iv seen ome of the threads and its sick ppl calll themselves a sikh wen they dnt follow they religion

sukh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

iv seen ome of the threads and its sick ppl calll themselves a sikh wen they dnt follow they religion

So all those so-called "Sikhs" before Guru Gobind Singh Ji have no right to claim that they are Sikhs?

You don't need to be an amrit-dharee to be a Sikh.

my msg is can a hair - cut singh claims he is a sikh?

in my view NO

i wear a pagh and everyday i tigh it i kiss the lar. keep a full dhari! proud of my sikhi korm!

Plenty has been said on topic - use the search facility.

Mod's Note: Edited- Keep your hatred to yourself and Spread Love on this forum

Also, what if the views on this forum clash with your own? Will you accept the willingness to see sense in what is being said, or will you just leave the forum and go somewhere where they will agree with your views?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does a Sikh need to keep hair ?

I think you should really ask yourself; Do you need your hair to learn about spirituality ?

Secondly, Jaidev(A bhagat to whose Bani you bow to) had a bhodi.

Gurfateh

Harpreet

PS. before the flood of criticism, im not stating that hair is unimportant. Please read comments carefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a clear distinction between a gurus sikh/a disciple and a khalsa. Just because followers of the gurus were not amrit dhari before the khalsa was formed, doesnt mean they werent sikhs.

You CAN be sikh and not have the panj kakkar, most definitely, but the only thing i would suggest (which doesnt mean squat but this is my opinion) is that u should keep ur dhari and take charan de pahul, to declare ur love for ur guru (and look distinct and manly) without having to become khalsa.

Having bits of protein hang off ur head and chin does NOT make u a singh!! Without the sacred amrit and being a khalsa, no one has the right to call himself a singh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot the most important concept in sikhism:

Call yourself Sikh ( By the way i dont claim one to be )

One who calls himself a Sikh of the Guru, the True Guru,

shall rise in the early morning hours and meditate on the Lord's Name.

Upon arising early in the morning, he is to bathe,

and cleanse himself in the pool of nectar.

Following the Instructions of the Guru, he is to chant the Name of the

Lord, Har, Har.

_________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One who calls himself a Sikh of the Guru, the True Guru,

shall rise in the early morning hours and meditate on the Lord's Name.

Upon arising early in the morning, he is to bathe,

and cleanse himself in the pool of nectar.

Following the Instructions of the Guru, he is to chant the Name of the

Lord, Har, Har.

crap, thats me out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...