Jump to content


Rakash Singh

Recommended Posts

***Breaking news***



The Lord’s feet are forever peace-giving. Whatever fruit one desires, he receives; his hopes shall not go in vain. || 1 ||

Says Nanak, everything has been perfectly resolved; I have found the Perfect True Guru. || 4 || 15 || 79 ||

(Taken from todays Hukamnamma, Ang 628)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been watching all the developments very closely on this issue.

I think the damage of rep building is understandable after days of peaceful protest and being frustated...Thats no biggie. Unfortunately, this biased media took full advantage of this..made a huge deal of it.

But passing on death threats on gurpreet and person who offered to show when rep refused it was totally out of order. Sikhs communities have allowed bunch of morons/fanatics to pass on death threat and funny thing is there was no "offical statement on behalf of gurdwaras" condemning this act.

All this hundreds years of hard work of our elders to have an respected image in the community all went in vain just by this act "sending death threats".

After such a damage we had golden oppurtunity when Gurdwara's were threated by people ..that they going to bomb the gurdwara's. We failed to take advantage of this golden oppurtunity and get media involved in this too...so people know that we don't only have fanatics but other side have fanatics too.

Result - Even though we managed to stop the show and some may think its a win suitation...make no mistake people...we have done more damage to ourselves than good..thats for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is hardly surpursing even that since the 1980s Sikhs in their paranoia of Hindus have been trying to model themselves on the militant models of the Islamic worlds, go read any statement on a pro-BKI and/or Khalistani Sikh site and this much is evident.

When, just like the majority of Muslims who have to suffer at the hands of a politically militant minority, so too can the Sikhs thanks to all the 'chardikala' "gursikhs" who have done such great service and citing Guru Gobind Singh's Zafarnama to justify their insolent actions.

It's high time that the Sikh youth affiliated with such organisation and federations grew out of their pathetically isolated immature outlook on life -you're really no different to the BNP, listen to their speeches and you'll see plenty of similar ideas and thoughts as those propagated by these "chardikala Singhs"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great Article in Canadian Famous Magazine.

source: http://www.macleans.ca/culture/news/showne...ontent=e122319A

Controversy over Sikh drama highlights religious-secular split in Britain


LONDON (AP) - A cancelled play, a damaged theatre, a playwright in hiding.

The violent clash of views sparked by a dark comedy depicting rape and murder in a Sikh temple shows that art and religion are still often failing to understand each other.

Some British Sikhs feel Behzti, or Dishonor, is offensive to their religion - an opinion shared by a Roman Catholic archbishop who said the play "demeans the sacred place of every religion." Artists and civil libertarians fear the devout are growing bolder in attempts to silence "offensive" artwork, and claim government moves to ban religious hatred will make things worse.

"The causing of offence is part of our business," said Nicholas Hytner, artistic director of the National Theatre.

"I don't think people have the right not to be offended by works of the imagination," he told the British Broadcasting Corp.

On Monday the Birmingham Repertory Theatre cancelled its run of Behzti after a violent protest by members of the Sikh community. Several police officers were injured and three people arrested after a small group within a 400-strong demonstration tried to storm the theatre, causing thousands of dollars worth of damage.

Birmingham Rep said it had reluctantly scrapped the play because it could not guarantee the safety of audiences and staff. Playwright Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti is reportedly in hiding after receiving death threats.

Sikh leaders say the play, which depicts acts of sexual abuse and murder in a fictional Gurdwara, or Sikh temple, demeaned their religion. They applauded the theatre's decision.

But artists and civil libertarians were dismayed. More than 700 actors, directors, writers, composers and academics - including actors Prunella Scales and Timothy West, poet laureate Andrew Motion, playwright Michael Frayn and Monty Python comedian Terry Jones - signed an open letter in support of the play.

"It is a legitimate function of art to provoke debate and sometimes to express controversial ideas. ... Those who use violent means to silence it must be vigorously opposed and challenged, whatever our faith, belief or opinions," said the letter, published Thursday in The Guardian newspaper.

Reaction to the play is split not between Sikhs and the rest of the community, but between the devout of all faiths and the secular.

Behzti received good reviews and drew large, multiracial audiences that included many Sikhs. Many artists of South Asian origin have come to its defence.

Christian leaders, meanwhile, joined their Sikh counterparts in criticism. "Such a deliberate, even if fictional, violation of the sacred place of the Sikh religion demeans the sacred place of every religion. People of all faiths, therefore, will be offended," said Vincent Nichols, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Birmingham.

John Sentamu, the Anglican Bishop of Birmingham, agreed that the play "causes the greatest offence to most people."

Works of art with religious themes often touch a nerve.

Terrence McNally's play Corpus Christi, which depicts Jesus as a gay man, drew protests by Roman Catholic groups when it debuted on Broadway in 1998. There were death threats against McNally when it played London in 1999.

Earlier this year the BBC pulled Popetown, a satirical animated series set in the Vatican, after complaints from Catholics.

The Vatican complained about a Nativity scene at Madame Tussauds wax museum that depicted soccer star David Beckham and his pop star wife Victoria as the parents of Jesus. It was removed after being damaged in an attack by a visitor.

In 1989, angry Muslim demonstrators burned copies of Salman Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses, which they said blasphemed the prophet Mohammed. Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued an edict calling for Rushdie's death, and the author spent years in hiding under tight security.

Britain has a long tradition of free speech, but the legal picture is murky. There is a law against blasphemy, but it applies only to the Christian faith, and has not been used successfully since 1979.

The government has proposed new legislation that would make inciting religious hatred a crime punishable by up to seven years in prison. The government says free speech will be protected under the law, but civil libertarians worry it will embolden protesters.

"This legislation might seem to endorse the kind of violence and intimidation we've seen in Birmingham," said the National Theatre's Hytner.

"It's only through the strongly and passionately expressed clash of ideas and beliefs that we have any hope at all of reaching an accommodation with each other," he added.

But Mohan Singh, spokesman for the Guru Nanak temple in Birmingham, said there must be limits to free speech.

"Maybe 5,000 people would have seen this play over the run. Are you going to upset 600,000 Sikhs in Britain and maybe 20 million outside the U.K. for that?" he said. "Religion is a very sensitive issue and you should be extremely careful."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

It really surprises me of how some people with an agenda show how desperate they are by putting down the Panthic Sangarsh and Shaheeds, even in unrelated threads. They just reek of desperation. Oh well…..


Link to comment
Share on other sites

where was the british media when there were thousands of protestors commemorating the death of sikhs in 1984??..in central bleedin london of all places! i swear this worlds going mad!

ironically enough that was about the right to life, in my view the right to offend is a lesser right yet it recieved infinitely more coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...