Kaur_05 Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Why dnt they do Jaikareh at Darbar Sahib? *confused Kaur* :? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mehargags Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 sachi but once when i gone there u have heard bole so nihalm sat shri akal 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaur_05 Posted November 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 I listen to Rehraas Paath from Harmandir Sahib on Alpha...I did not hear a jaikara after Ardas andnoticed it so many times... Whats goin on or is it jus me? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
challenge_everything Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 there is no jaikara at darbar sahib 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehtab Singh Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 This is from my limited knowledge. A Singh told me that Sri Harimandir Sahib is the symbol of peace, and the jakara is a warcry. So probably thats 1 reason why its not raised there? Anyone else have more info? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaur_05 Posted November 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 challenge > can u expand as to why this is? Singh > All Darbar sahibs have Guru ji there which signif peace but our Jaikara is important, no? It jus seems the more u read into Sikhi the more confused this girl gets!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niranjana Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 It probably more to do with the legacy of those who, be it well intentioned or not, have systematically undertaken a campaign to define ALL sikh matters SOLELY by their interpretations of Gurbani and regard all other items (unless of course when it suits them) as BIPAR propaganda. The result of this is what we see in many of today's main movements, be they "PANTHIC" or not. This is what has led to some to question the Kakkar, Amrit Sanchar, Simran (in terms of Dhyana, Dharana, Samadhi - all today thought to be Bipar concepts and unsikh), the Dasam Granth, and various other traditions, heritage, legacies that have come down over the past 500 years for the Sikhs. In a similar tone, those who may physically hold steadfast to their EXTERNAL rehits and actions in the name of Maryada, also have through the same principle led to the downfall of aspects such as Katha, Literature, Kavi Darbars, (Gurmat) Sangeet, arts (unless of course we consider the comic book type creations using Quark Express to qualify as this), cuisine, and so on. In the same way, no doubt, the fact that "Bole So Nihal, Sat Sri Akal" not appearing in the Sri Guru Granth Sahib per se, has something to do with this occurence. But let's all relax, no doubt, this is all the works of th sinster RSS...the "Haua" of today's Tat Khalsa. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mloco Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 Kaur_05 people do a lot of different things, but these minor external differences are not tooo important. Sikhi is much more about Simran abhyass, and most importantly prem. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAadmin Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 Kaur_05 people do a lot of different things, but these minor external differences are not tooo important. Sikhi is much more about Simran abhyass, and most importantly prem. exactly ji 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.