Jump to content

nihangs and khalistan..


Recommended Posts

**** Edited ****

Narsingha ji,

PM feature is for private messages and you're breaking the privacy rule. You can ask Bikramjit singh and start new thread where you can post your response but without his permission PM are not allowed to post directly on the forum.

Just go to your sent folder and you can copy your response form there.

And this has nothing to do with mainstream sikhs or non but its a part of civilized society.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

..understood truthsingh

Bikramjit is asking me to violate the laws of Khalsa maryada and the law of the UK.

As such, his private messages will not be responded to. Unlike him, I have nothing to prove, and I politely request that Bikramjit take his rude-boy fantasies elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's up to you and bikramjit and like I said if you want to discuss it openly then we have no problem but just let him know about it. There is nothing wrong in discussing issues as we all learn something from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BikramjitSingh

Narsingha

I wanted to keep this between just you and myself. Since you have chosen to make this public, then I will post up some info for the other forum users.

Forum Users

As everyone here is aware Narsingha has been puting his 'sanatan' Sikhism views for some time. Whenever any of the Sikhs have tried to counter his views, his usual reply is that that person is a 'egotist' 'spoon fed' and 'brainwashed' 'British Sikh' whatever that is. He has also challenged other Sikhs such as Inderjit Singh and lately Sukh Singh to meet him at the Akhara.

His reply to Inderjit Singh was pretty threatening

"I assume you the same individual who turned up at the Holla Mohalla tournament organised by Boota Singh earlier this year and insulted Nihang Niddar Singh in private. However, when you were asked politely to repeat your comments in public (while facing a camera) and refute Sanatan Sikhi and Shastar Vidiya with any evidence of your own, you ran off?"

Narsingha has a long history of issuing such challenges. He has issued similar challenges to myself both here and at Sikh-history forum where I am a moderator. His first challenge referred to that fact that 'Guru Gobind Singh use to want to see his Singhs engaged in combat'. As such it is pretty clear that his challenges carry a threat. I have accepted his challenges as I believe that he is just a fustrated 'soorma in his own lunchtime' hiding behind a keyboard. His reply to my acceptance of his challenge just highlights this further. Rather than meet at his Akhara I have challenged him to meet me personally. As it has been clear to me from his first challenge that he thinks he can brow beat anyone countering his 'sanatan' Sikhism by asking that person to meet him at the Akhara.

My advice to Narsingha is either don't issue challenges or back them up and don't hide behind the law

GurFateh

Bikramjit Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Javanmard

Sorry Bikramjit but I have read your threats against Narsingha. You are breaking British law and SIkh maryada as well. Such behaviour is unacceptable! A Sikh is supposed to behave with outmust galantry and decorum. Sikhi is not about showing how much of a man you are. That's GI Joe Sikhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BikramjitSingh

lalleswari

When a challenge is made then it is up to a true Sikh to accept it.

Jabeh Baan Lageh Tabeh Ros Jageh

GurFateh

Bikramjit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i do not want to say too much about the whole 'nihang singh debate' in uk as there are hidden agendas on all sides that most of the sangat don't know about

but leeswari and others who are saying Bikramjit singh is breaking uk laws and sikhi laws by his challange

how different is this challange to the very open public challanges that the jathedar of budda dal uk has made to Gursikhs in uk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BikramjitSingh

Truthsingh and other moderators

As you have deleted Narsingha pasting of his and my Personal Messages because he did not have my agreement to make them public, I have nothing against them being put up. I hope they will not be deleted now as they explain the mentality of Narsingha

Personal message to Narsingha at Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:33 pm. This was in reply to his challenge to myself and others to meet him at his Akhara

******

Narsingha

I see your are still into challenging people to meet you in your akhara.

What's the matter ?. You need your friends to hold your hands ?

Either put up or shut up

I've accepted your challenge at for the last three times.

Let's meet in a place where you can have a good private rumble. I know a lot of places and you tell me where you are I'll tell you the best place closest to you.

Bikramjit

******

Narsingh's reply to me Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:42 pm

******

Bikramjit

It has to be noted, 3 times you have declined to meet me in the Akhara.

Should you wish a physical challange in some "place" then you should know that the message you just sent is actually against the law. (Pls consult the Police should you seek clarification).

The reason for telling you to come to the Akhara is that this is the place traditionally where disputes are settled, either physically, or intellectually under the maryada of the Khalsa.

Now, either educate yourself, or learn some manners.

*********

Another message from Narsingha to me at Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:10 pm

*******

I will save u the embarresment of making you out to be the fool you are in public.

You seem to take these forums very seriously dont you?

Get a life...this is the internet...lol...

******

My reply to Narsingha at Wed Jul 23, 2003 6:08 pm

********

admin cut

My challenge still stands

Either put up or shut up

Gurfateh

Bikramjit

*****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BikramjitSingh

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa

Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

My sincere apologies to the administrator, the moderators and the other forum users. Sometimes when you want to unmask a Giddar pretending to be a Sher such unpleasantness is needed.

GurFateh

Bikramjit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NarSingh said the following

---------------------------------------------------

I will save u the embarresment of making you out to be the fool you are in public.

You seem to take these forums very seriously dont you?

Get a life...this is the internet...lol

-----------------------------------------

that makes me laugh

cus all of NarSinghs 'warped views' and dodgy parchar has been over the internet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

i

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Bikramjit...u sound like some rude boy in Southall just looking for a fight because someone scratched your car...

(not to mention "sukhsingh" as the ailing side-kick hiding behing the car)

You even go as far as to tring to break the law...and think you have unmasked a demon. Jeez...Bikramjit...get some friends...go out. Start enjoying life.

In addition, kindly stop sending me insults in private...the least you can do is ACT like you're over 20...seeing how your mental age proves otherwise. Call me a admin cut, etc etc if it makes you feel any better....bottom line is you are frustrated, annoyed and a cry baby...

(have you received your siropa from the SGPC yet?)

Sorry to say this, but you cant stop the websites, or this information from propagating....in fact, all you are doing is revealing your own frustration and anger at being so helpless.

..lol..sikhs of today...

Would it make you feel any better if I was a muslim or a hindu? lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

narsingha stop spreading hate, and shit for the indian goverment, at the end realise u are here cause of sikhisim, so don't become a chela and bow as an agent

i can't find the link but the bhudda dal, not fake dal england as a website and it shows the truth, vegeterniamsim...... but meat is acceptable, every nihung dal as shunned bhung...but we have narsinghas website promoting it, i wonder why?

nar singha, if u know jathedar akali nihung baba nihal singh ji khalsa, u will now that there is no other way but that of khalistan.....

bikram jit and sukh have said it correct, u r a giddar, a coward, a gaoo

stop splitting this split up quam further with ur mess'd up cultic views which go against ne rehit maryada out there, cept for the one that dwells in u.

if ur such a nihung, u must be without ne attatcmenets or posseccions yet u ail to use of a computer hmmm

damn i c it shining in u

KHALISTAN ZINDAAAAAAABAAAAAD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like to correct you gabro..sant baba nihal singh never said anything about khalistan but khalsa raj.

On a side note- Can we all get along in intellectual discussion..instead of doin nindiya of other gursikhs??? read sukhmani sahib ji.. how bad is the ninidya?? why screw up the naam kaamiya you guys have already by slanderin others you dont know???

Stop this bullocks. I ll lock this topic if anyone start spewing hate from this point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gabro dear boy...

A computer, just like any other is a device of maya that is to be used, and not to let it use you. Evidently some people seem to be letting their emotions get the better of them.

Well, Im sure the Khalistani faction will be very proud of having such a Gabroo such as yourself in their ranks. Its usual amongst these groups to accuse people of being "Indian Government agents" or RSS agents anytime they see something that doesnt fit their Khalistani model of Sikhi.

Secondly, which "Panth" are you referring to? SGPC Panth? AKJ Panth? Sant Panth? 3HO Panth? Talksali Panth? Niskaam Sevak Jatha Panth?

...it seems mainstream Sikhi is doing a pretty good job of splitting itself up without the Sanatan Sikh getting involved.

At least wait for www.nihang.com before aiming your rifles in my direction (....make sure ur aiming at me, and not the aunty sitting in the gurudwara innocently peeling potatoes...the marksmanship of wannabes such as yourselves is legendary)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember sant jarnail singh bhindranwale words.. he was never favour of khalistan nor he was against it.

n30, sant jee said he's neither for nor against khalistan, but he wanted a place in which sikhs wouldn't be oppressed -- he wanted sikhs to be free, without being treated as slaves -- and as far as i'm concerned, india isn't exactly the place where sikhs have been free -- they've been oppressed since they first asked for freedom

the idea of khalistan wasn't started by 'fanatics'

in 1947 when the Muslim League was given Pakistan, Gandhi & Nehru promised the Sikhs their own land, if the Sikhs would help the Hindus build India back to its original strength. The idea of Khalistan started THEN - because the Muslims were a minority and they received their own land, and just as the Sikhs were a minority, they deserved their own land too... Nehru and Gandhi never kept their promises, and hate crimes against Sikhs continued. 1984 was the height of all baysharmi by the government, apart from the attacks on the golden temple, hundreds of thousands of people were killed, imprisioned, raped, beat up, etc., (and i've read that number was in an encycopedia..)

india's also been known to have killed millions of other non-hindus -- christians, buddhists, muslims, and so on..

sant jee may not have been for or against khalistan, but he did want sikhs to be free from oppression, and i don't see that happening in india...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs,

I would say that let's get real here and see the truth.

Its heavy reading but it will bring the truth.

How do people now view about Khalistan?

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....99?OpenDocument

Guru Gobind singh ji & Khalistan??????

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....CC?OpenDocument

Khalistan

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....9C?OpenDocument

Zia never supported ‘Khalistan’

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....CA?OpenDocument

Sikh Nationalism " common sikhs view"

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....08?OpenDocument

Wanting a Khalsa Raj is nothing New

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....88?OpenDocument

Anger seething beneath the calm - Khalistan

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....20?OpenDocument

India's shameful legacy.

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....27?OpenDocument

Article :- Sikh separatist returns home defiant

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....20?OpenDocument

Brahmanwad Zindabad

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....35?OpenDocument

Debate on Khalistan in Public

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....D9?OpenDocument

Babar S khalistan Post - Support Khalistan http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion.nsf/SearchView/A8DD31DE77EA25B287256B5700107C7B?OpenDocument

warning to others - Nick Singh pls respond

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....43?OpenDocument

KHALSA -- before khalistan

http://www.sikhnet.com/Sikhnet/discussion....62?OpenDocument

WAKE UP, UNITE, AND FIGHT FOR KHALISTAN!

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....21?OpenDocument

www.saintsoldiers.cjb.net

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....23?OpenDocument

Greatest Sikh of the 20th Century - Nominate a person.

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....68?OpenDocument

Why not declare all of Punjab as Khalistan, not just Indian Side?

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....62?OpenDocument

KHALASTAN

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....8E?OpenDocument

Self Govern

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....BE?OpenDocument

Fight for freedom

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....A0?OpenDocument

Darbar Sahib

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....F1?OpenDocument

I don't understand Sikhs, who don't want their own state.

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....DF?OpenDocument

Operation Bluestar - An Ex-MP's View

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....4D?OpenDocument

Justification for Khalistan

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....B7?OpenDocument

New Delhi bombing

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....6A?OpenDocument

Kalyug Ton Satyug Tak

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....9A?OpenDocument

1984: the Sequel to Mahabharat

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....CA?OpenDocument

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa

Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

I was not going to getting into debating about the issue of Khalistan. But i can’t see all this false info going around.

Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa clearly states and if u ever meet any off the old Taksali Singhs or the Saint Soldiers who fought in the jathas back home, they will clearly tell u Sant Ji stood for only Sikhi and justice. Sant Ji in his tapes clearly says that:

"IF SRI HARMANDIR SAHIB IS ATTACKED THE FOUNDATION STONE OF KHALISTAN WILL BE LAID"

We have to understand that Sant Ji as a Sikh stood with the Panth he didnt go against the wishes of the Panth, he took part fully in the struggle to get our demands 2 be meet peacfully, but when asked about his view on khalistan he gave his view to the press that of a sikh who is part of a Panth it was not the panth's aim to create a Independent State then.

But after the attack the we had no other option to exercise our right to selfdefence.

The Singhs and Singhnia after 1984 carried out wishes and still carry on the Dharam Yudh, singhs like Bhai Manvir Singh ji, Bhai Swarnjeet Singh, Bhai Gurdev Singh Usmanwalla, Baba Gurbhachan Singh Manochahal, Jathadar Avtar Singh Brahma, General Labh Singh, Bhai Harjinder Singh Jinda, Bhai Sukdev Singh Sukha Bibi Manjit Kaur, Bibi Resham Kaur who were puran Gursikhs who lived sikhi in a practical form. These Dharmi singhs and Singhnia stood out like beacons of light for me when growing up.

If we really love Sikhi and our beautifully history we wouldnot bad mouth these Gursikhs or any other Gursikhs who stood with the Panth in our hour off need. Would we call Baba Gurbaskh Singh the second Jathadar of the DamiDami Taksal (which is all so started by Guru Ji)a coward?? Because he stayed in the Akal Takhat then he and his jatha of 19 Singhs fought the mughals and gained shaheedi defending Sri Akal Takhat, would we call Sukha Singh and Methab Singh terrorists for bring to justice massa rangar??? these beautiful petals are our blood and soul that’s what makes me proud.

Yea we all got stories of other so-called Sikhs killing innocent ppl and things happening which are against Sikhi, i cant and will not justify them, i agree things went badly wrong after 1989 but lets not condemn the WHOLE movement. As for looking for TRUTH u aint going to find it on the net, u can give all the references u want to and i would not go by what the Sikhnet has to say about the movement :( it’s sad we Sikhs are ready to put down those very ppl who gave EVERYTHING FOR US :(

Dnt waste ur time on the UK nihangs, there is a hidden agenda out there which ppl new to Sikhi wont understand I feel sorry for them as these issues shouldn’t confuse and take ppl away from the path of siki.

Please Sangat Ji watch out for the miss info on the net.

may Guru ji guide us and educate us

Gurfateh

Guruji's foot soldier

Sukdev Singh Jhamka

i picked this name in loving memory of Bhai Sukdev Singh Jhamka who gave his Shaheedi fighting for the Glory of the Panth

Dhan Dhan Guru Sahib Ji

Dhan Dhan teera Khalsa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...