Jump to content

10 Questions on Sikhism From Muslims / Ex-Sikhs


sikhs2islam

Recommended Posts

From Sikhs 2 Islam :-

1. Is Guru Nanak a False Prophet?

Guru Nanak Dev was born in Punjab, India, on 20 October 1469, to a Hindu family. By the time of his death on 22 September 1539, according to Sikh Scriptures ( more of which later ) , he had “millions†of followers.

Now, Guru Nanak never claimed to be a prophet in his lifetime. However, if the scriptures of the Sikh religion are to be believed, he believed himself to be inspired from God, and to bring teachings of God. For example :-

“There is no Muslim, there is no Hinduâ€

"One who recognizes the One Lord among all beings does not talk of ego.â€

These are clear atonements, meant to inspire and motivate Sikhs and non-Sikhs to alter their lives and live according to Sikhism. Sikhs often claim that the Guru’s were merely teachers, or guides, and were not Prophets.

However, if we consult the linguistic definition of Prophet, we discover the following meanings of the term :-

“A person who speaks by divine inspiration or as the interpreter through whom the will of a god is expressed.â€

“someone who speaks by divine inspiration; someone who is an interpreter of the will of Godâ€

“a person regarded as, or claiming to be, an inspired teacher or leaderâ€

Therefore, whenever anyone claims to speak on behalf of God, rationally and linguistically that person is considered to be claiming Prophethood.

When a person claims Prophethood, this claim must then be verified. Prophets throughout history have brought miracles to demonstrate to their people ( Moses, Abraham, David, and Others, may peace be upon them all ) . For example Moses spilt the Red Sea, David was able to melt metal in his hands, and Abraham was able to withstand fire. These miracles have been verified both through scriptures and through science.

There are also many false Prophets. These have included David Icke , Mirza Ghulam Ahmad , and many others.

By Sikhs refusing to acknowledge that Guru Nanak was claiming to be a Prophet, they sidestep this issue. This is in order to avoid any means of principles of falsification, in order to confirm or disprove the Guru’s “Prophethoodâ€.

It is the contention of the author however that Guru Nanak was a False Prophet, or was falsely claimed to be a prophet by his followers. Any information regarding his “true†Prophethood can be sent to SikhstoIslam@gmail.com, for verification.

2. Are the Sikh Scriptures authentic?

In order for anyone to follow Gods teachings, one must be sure, with absolute certainty and without doubt, that the teachings they are following are authentic. Sikhism has a number of scriptures which they claim are written by Gurus ( and therefore divinely inspired ). However, these scriptures can be proven to have no historical or authentic basis.

A. the Janamsakhi

Sikhs claim that the Bhai Bala Janamsakhi was written by Bala Sandhu, a disciple of Guru Nanak. However, Guru Angad, the next Guru in succession, had never heard of Bala Sandhu. In addition to this, Bala Sandhu is not mentioned by Bhai Gurdas. How can Guru Nanaks closest confidants and disciples not know Bala Sandhu?

There are a number of other errors. For example, the rhythmic prose used in the verse was written by the third and fifth Guru’s, so how can this be present chronologically earlier? Also, the language used was not even present in society for over 100 years after the death of Guru Nanak.

How can it be that a divinely inspired work, detailing the life of the Guru, can be so inaccurate?

B.The Guru Granth Sahib Ji

Sikhs claim that this book is the “Eleventh†and final Guru, and should be regarded and revered as a Guru. There is even a tale of this book, upon compilation, to be given its own bed whilst a Guru, Guru Arjan slept on the floor!

For this book to be the 11th Guru, the final way to God and scripture in its own right, surely it would have to be a perfect book, free from errors and contradictions? However, we find that this is not the case. Some errors include :-

Teaching God to be “Sargun†(Possessing Attributes) and “Nargun†( Possessing no Attributes).

Claims there is only one way to God, then says many ways

Reincarnation is taught in one section, yet is rejected elsewhere

How can it be that a Divinely inspired book, a Guru, a way to God, be so full of contradictions?

In addition to this, the Book provides no details of the origins of the Earth or of Man, and provides no answers to “where did we come from†as a result. Surely any divinely inspired text would present Gods answer to these questions?

3. How can Re-Incarnation be Accurate?

In Sikhism, it is the belief that through righteous deeds one achieves salvation, and a “oneness†with God. The main method of this is through “karmaâ€, or the reward of your efforts in this life being rewarded in the next, and so on and so on until spiritual union with God is achieved.

Though this sounds like a nirvana of sorts, it is completely non-sensical. Reincarnation cannot possibly be true as :-

How can the world be in decline, when spiritual karma is meant to increase and improve the world? What is the source for evil originally? Who was the original evildoer according to Sikhism, and which sent a perpetual evil through the earth, increasing its trials?

There is no justice in re-incarnation, as you become a new entity, with no recollection of a past life. Therefore, it is the entity that is being unfairly punished, and not you.

Why are there more bodies on earth now, than there was before? Where do these new Souls emerge from?

Re-incarnation is therefore absurd, and cannot be correct because it does not agree with rationality.

4. How can God be Omnipotent and within Evil?

For Sikhs to state that God is “all pervading and is in all directions. God is omniscient, omnipotent and loves allâ€, what does that mean?

Firstly how can God be in everything? Would God be in Impure things such as Excreta?

Secondly, how can God be within everyone? What is the point, according to Sikhism, of trying to attain Union with God, when God is already within us according to their scriptures? How can God be within people and objects which are intrinsically evil?

5. How can Sikhs claim to have a complete way of Life?

Sikhism is claimed to be a complete way of life, but Sikhism does not have the answers from their scriptures for the following questions :-

How much tax should I pay in a Sikh State, as a Non-Sikh?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding testimony in a court?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding the sentence for stealing?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding the age of maturity?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding my relations with my neighbour?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding how I should treat an animal?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding lawful earnings?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding killing a non-Sikh and the punishment for that?

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding riding a horse?

What is the ruling in Sikhism if I use a nuclear weapon?

Sikhism only covers prayer and religious obligations. It has no understanding of how to interact with the real world. It has no detailed economic system, social system, or ruling system.

Sikhism is not alone in this. There is no belief in the entire world, except Islam, that has the answers to problems that mankind encounter on a day to day basis. In Islam, the Qu’ranic verses on Society outnumber verses on individual worship many times over. In the hadith books, only 3 or 4 chapters relate to ibadaat ( individual worship ), whilst over 100 chapters in Bukhari relate to muamalaat ( societal transactions).

Islam contains a complete ruling, economic, social and ritual system, applicable to all times and places because it is from the Creator, Allah (SWT), your God and my God.

6. What is a Just War in Sikhism?

Sikhism is often presented as a peaceful, non-violent religion. However, it has a concept of Dharam Yudh, which is loosely translated as “Just Warâ€. In this, Sikhs believe that war can be initiated as a last option, and the motivation cannot be revenge.

When we see this in practice however, we can see that very rarely has a Sikh War been any different to any other war fought on behalf of misguided religions : For Land, Nation and Resources.

Examples of this include :-

The forceful passing of a resolution to cede Water and Electricity Boards to Punjab Control in the region

The murder of Indian Police officers in 1982 – 1983, in revenge

Bhindrandales Murder of two nirinkari Gurus in 1981

Bombing of Cinemas in Delhi in 2005

Bombing of Air India Flight 182

Most people will realise that these examples cited appear far from “Justâ€. Often, they appear to target civilians. If such action is justified according to these principles, then on what basis?

If the Gurus are false Prophets, the Scriptures inaccurate, and the concepts and precepts erroneous, then how can Sikhism be used to take life unjustly?

7. How can God Create himself?

According to Guru Nanak Dev, he claims that “God himself told me that he is self-createdâ€.

How can God be subject to laws and constraints of his own creation? Concepts such as time, form, shape, etc, are constructs of God. As an unlimited entity, how can God be subject to limited constraints, such as “creatingâ€.

Surely, as God, he is outwith all such concepts. To ask how God is “made†is to misunderstand what God is.

8. Why can Sikh women not Divorce?

Sikhism still does not give the right of divorce to its adherents except in extreme circumstances, and even then since it is not legislated within Sikhism this is decided by Western or Hindu Courts.

This is mentioned in many sources, and some quotes from Sikhs are as follows :-

“In the case of broken marriage, divorce is not possible according to the Sikh religious tradition. The couple can, however, obtain a divorce under the Civil law of the land.â€

Of more concern is how Sikhs refuse to even consider divorce, leaving the spouse trapped in a loveless marriage. Take this example from the Sikh Spectrum Magazine :-

When two souls become one, there is no duality between the way a husband and a wife think. Whatever they do, they do it together. A divorce, in such a case, is inconceivable.

It is incredulous that anything calling itself “the modern religion†still does not emancipate women and give them independence.

9. How can Sikhs Claim that there are “many paths to Godâ€, then he Punishes those whom do not adhere to Sikhism ?

It is claimed Sikhism is non-discriminatory, and that everyone should love each other as human beings, with no-one having a variable status, no-one being “high or lowâ€. His statement is as follows :-

“In Sikhism everyone is equal. All people of different colour, religion, caste, creed, race and sex are equal in the eyes of God. No one is high or low. All are children of God created by God and God loves them all.â€

However, the Guru’s own teachings portray a different version of events. :-

Favouring of those in Khalsa

Khalsa is the baptizing of Sikhs, who take an Oath to promote and preserve the five Ks of Sikhism. These Sikhs are to be considered to hold a higher status over that of ordinary persons, and thereby this exposes a hierarchical system. Quotations regarding this brotherhood include :-

“he who recognises the One God and no pilgrimages, alms-giving, non-destruction of life, penances, or austerities; and in whose heart the light of the Perfect One shines, - he is to be recognised as a pure member of the Khalsaâ€

Thereby, if we are to believe this Guru, and by proxy the beliefs of Sikhism itself, then God, through the Gurus, considered those persons inferior whom :-

Engage in Pilgrimages

Fasts

Worships Idols

Are thereby considered inferior in Gods eyes (according to the Gurus).

In addition to this, those who eat meat, those that cut their hair, and many other tenets of Sikh faith that are violated, God will punish them through re-incarnation, even though these people are also following a path (as they perceive it ) to God.

In Sikhs claims that there are “no chosen peopleâ€, why must people adhere to Sikhism to be saved? Why must they take the Khalsa ?

10. Why is Sikhism Not Evangelical?

If Sikhism is Gods religion, which is the destiny of all if they are to be saved, and the only way to enlightenment ( as Sikhs perceive it ) is to follow the “Way of the Gurusâ€, then why do Sikhs not debate and discuss their faith in the World and try to convert others to it?

Is this fair, if it is the truth ( which it is not ), then why do Sikhs not ask others to join it?

Conclusion

No doubt this article has encouraged and enraged Sikhs in equal measure, however the lines of dialogue for both are open. Please contact Sikhstoislam@gmail.com if you wish to discuss any of the points raised in this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Gurfateh

Has Javanmard there then Hellworthy Wahabi would have been given the approporate reply.

Das may try to answer the questions .

1.Was Guru the prophet?

When Tenth Guru talks as Rasol(SWAS) as prophet then last one then why so fuss.

Then another useless defiantations of Prphet ie prohet could be one who tells future as prophecies also.

But by the way has this guy read Holy Kuran.Does he know that it is Allah who does all.Prophet is mere sham.Allah is everywhere and truth else all is false.

But it appears that there is some thing like prophet who contrls Allah.At the day of Hashr Rasol(SWAS) will slap on the face of idiots Tablighis that they did not follow Sikh Panth.

Guru said all good things were done by Allah and Allah workeed in him.After Guru it was endorose ,Allah omni potant is not bound by any Shara or code and can change any b lody Shara.

First Master was merely a human which Allah chose to let Allahs truth come to Ummat via him.

coming to false miracle as proof of prophet hood.Boy such miracles by Dajjal before Imam Mehdi,whill very to told to prove Dajjal as devine.and guys like you will side with Dajjal.And be one eyed like him.Then also scripture and scine will prove as your mind think like that.Dajjal is one eyed person coing to destroy faith,to whom mehdi meer will take care of.

to be continued..

Link to post
Share on other sites

use your passion and conviction to better yourself to please allah, until you become an example and become a walking testament to the words of allah, you will not get any converts.

a person who can be swayed mentally from position a to position be can also be swayed to position c...

do I doubt your conviction? no, do these man made litmus tests mean anything to me? no. Does the fact that me being a good sikh has encouraged muslims i've met to become better muslims mean something to me....hanji, and i openly admit that i am nearly completely flawed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kam,

The proof that I have that the Qu'ran is the word of God is simple :-

1. It issues a challenge to "produce a chapter like it". Do a search on the internet about it, you will see no-one has ever produced a chapter like the Qu'ran.

2. There are no contradictions in the Qu'ran, like it promises.

All through the Qu'ran, Allah (God) asks people to prove him wrong, like the points mentioned above, and no-one is able to do it.

Thats why i and so many of my friends left false religions behind and followed Islam.

Why does Sikhism not have a way to prove it right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

do a search on the internet about it,

seems like the most advanced research method you have used in your study. the points are just not worth answering. Had you presented research of an academic level rather than random stuff yuo could think of and find of google, im sure some one would have replied.

I am happy for you - you got what you deserved in life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case if the Gurus are false, then why is it that within places such as Baghdad, Iran, Egypt, and even Mecca there are shrines dedicated to the Great Gurus, and why is is that the Ismaili Muslims claim Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj to be one of their Hujjat, which is a Godly Person, Nhramgiani, Walli Allah.

further more, why are there pictures of the ten Great Gurus within Shia shrines along side the pictures of the holy Imams. in addition to this one would liek to have the opportunity to add that there are many, many instances where Muslims, be they Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Ahmadiya etc etc, that claim that the Great Guru Nanak was a Muslim himself.

Now lets evaulate the current facts, as we have already established, the Great Gurus are considered to be Muslims, by Muslims themselves, this indicates that these very Muslims that claim this about the Great Gurus see that the Gurus are obviuosly not Kaafir and are not commiting Kufr, so then how on earth would one explain this, as if these very Muslims claimed the Great Gurus to be Kaafir they would not say that they are Muslims, but as teh case stands that they are called and claimed to be Muslim, they are not Kafir then.

Moreover, if one was to travel to certain areas of this vast world, it wil be easily noted and bought to the attention that Muslims, YES, Muslims, give the title of Hazrat, Peer, Shah, Fakir, Baba, Walli Allah, Hujjat and even Nanak Lama in Tibet, so one must appreciate that if the Great Gurus were mearly what you claim them to be then why are these titles of Great homour bestowed by Your very own Mulim brothers and sister onto the Great Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaaj!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Shakespeare is unique and NO ONE has produced anything like that also, all you guys are trying to do is prove that your religion or way of precieving God is the only way im reality this is not the case, God is beyond preception...........

and in any case there are many versions of the Quran and interpretations of it. Let me remind you of the Great Muslim Called, Dara Shekoh who wrote the Majma Al Bahrain (The Mingling of The Oceans) in this very treatise, Dara Shekoh, provides and talks about the root of the Islamic traditions and the Indic traditons to be one and same in nature, but, differ on the outter level.

You only see Kaafir in others if you see Kaafir in yourself first!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case if the Gurus are false, then why is it that within places such as Baghdad, Iran, Egypt, and even Mecca there are shrines dedicated to the Great Gurus, and why is is that the Ismaili Muslims claim Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj to be one of their Hujjat, which is a Godly Person, Nhramgiani, Walli Allah.

further more, why are there pictures of the ten Great Gurus within Shia shrines along side the pictures of the holy Imams. in addition to this one would liek to have the opportunity to add that there are many, many instances where Muslims, be they Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Ahmadiya etc etc, that claim that the Great Guru Nanak was a Muslim himself.

No Muslim Mumin(believer ) would ever create Shrines for a start, so those that do ( Such as Shia, Ismaili and other disbelieving sects ) are obviously misguided. Idolatry is completely prohibited in Islam ( like in Sikhism ) and Photos, etc, as objects of veneration are prohibited. There are no public “shrines†in Mecca containing any photos, let alone those of Gurus!

Some musims do claim that Nanak Dev was a muslim ( not an opinion I follow ) , and that Sikhs afterwards began to elevate him as the founder of a new religion, much like Christians did with Jesus. People are free from what others may accuse or associate them with after their death, and they are only accountable for what they do in their own lifetimes.

Now lets evaulate the current facts, as we have already established, the Great Gurus are considered to be Muslims, by Muslims themselves, this indicates that these very Muslims that claim this about the Great Gurus see that the Gurus are obviuosly not Kaafir and are not commiting Kufr, so then how on earth would one explain this, as if these very Muslims claimed the Great Gurus to be Kaafir they would not say that they are Muslims, but as teh case stands that they are called and claimed to be Muslim, they are not Kafir then.

As I stated previously, some muslims do claim that Nanak Dev, etc were Muslim. I do not subscribe to that theory, because Nanak is said to have stated “There is no muslim there is no Hinduâ€, so how can one profess to believe in something that he rejects? Anyone who accepts a religion other than Islam is a disbeliever ( kaffir ).

Moreover, if one was to travel to certain areas of this vast world, it wil be easily noted and bought to the attention that Muslims, YES, Muslims, give the title of Hazrat, Peer, Shah, Fakir, Baba, Walli Allah, Hujjat and even Nanak Lama in Tibet, so one must appreciate that if the Great Gurus were mearly what you claim them to be then why are these titles of Great homour bestowed by Your very own Mulim brothers and sister onto the Great Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaaj!!!!!!

No muslim I know has ever used the terms Peer, Shah, Fakir, Wali-allah, etc…these are Sufi, innvovative traditions. People associated with these terms are often disbelievers, who claim to be saints to extort money from believers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Shakespeare is unique and NO ONE has produced anything like that also, all you guys are trying to do is prove that your religion or way of precieving God is the only way im reality this is not the case, God is beyond preception...........

People have replicated shakespeare, time and again. I will locate the link.

and in any case there are many versions of the Quran and interpretations of it.

Intepretations, yes. Versions, no. The Quran has been unchanged, and in the arabic language, since it was first revealed. Heres a link Miracle of the Quran

Let me remind you of the Great Muslim Called, Dara Shekoh who wrote the Majma Al Bahrain (The Mingling of The Oceans) in this very treatise, Dara Shekoh, provides and talks about the root of the Islamic traditions and the Indic traditons to be one and same in nature, but, differ on the outter level.

Well ive never heard of him, isnt it funny how you call him a great muslim because he probably supports your arguments?

You only see Kaafir in others if you see Kaafir in yourself first!!!!!!!
[

Er, no...I see Disbelief in others when it is apparent

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i suspected you are a Sunni, a follower of the ones who killed the Prophet Mohammad, and secondly just because you have not heard anyone use such titles for the Great Gurus is does NOT mean that they do not exist...the problem with narrow minded fanatics such as yourself is the fact that, you believe the whole world evloves around what YOU have seen, what YOU have heard etc etc

It seems to me that you are extremely insecure with your own beilef system as if you are dead sure you are successful with the path to attaining God, then what does it matter to you what others are doing...

And anyways take a look at www.inthenameofallah.org and have a glance at the meanings of Allah, coming from the ones who claim to be worshippers of the ultimate timeless lord, Allah has two children, How on Earth can this be.....http://www.inthenameofallah.org/Allah.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i suspected you are a Sunni, a follower of the ones who killed the Prophet Mohammad

As I suspected, you have not done your research. The Prophet(saw) died of natural causes at the age of 63. No one killed him!

if you are dead sure you are successful with the path to attaining God, then what does it matter to you what others are doing...

Because that is a selfish mentality. Why should anyone be the only person who is "saved"? The right path is for all, not just a closed set of people from a region or district.

Meanwhile, I will investigate your link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Shakespeare is unique and NO ONE has produced anything like that also, all you guys are trying to do is prove that your religion or way of precieving God is the only way im reality this is not the case, God is beyond preception...........

and in any case there are many versions of the Quran and interpretations of it. Let me remind you of the Great Muslim Called, Dara Shekoh who wrote the Majma Al Bahrain (The Mingling of The Oceans) in this very treatise, Dara Shekoh, provides and talks about the root of the Islamic traditions and the Indic traditons to be one and same in nature, but, differ on the outter level.

You only see Kaafir in others if you see Kaafir in yourself first!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many versions to the death of the Prophet and in any case, there are Hadiths which strongly prove that the Correct Muslims are those of Imam Ali, there are clear mention of this within Sunni Hadiths aslo, and is it not true that the Quran still has the blood of the Prophet on it today, who was killed by the Sunni lineage!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol..funny debate..it started with an ex-sikh asking questions on sikhism, and instead, people started bashing Islam and asking new questions instead of answering the ones that already were....

:D

personally, i find the questions given by sikh2islam easy to answer...do some research dear brothers, and give him a correct answar instead of bashing the Holy Prophet Muhammad..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurfateh

He may not be an ex Sikh but an orgional wahhbi.

Das will answer his questions but can some one call Javnamard.Das thinks this is his pray.Das himself is more pro Sufi and even Pro hanifi Sunni.so lets us wait how the supporter of Ahale Bait deals with him.for das ahle Bait is Shirk.

Dear Sikhism To Islam,Sikhism itself is Islam(surrender to the will of Allah).Allah is one who only rules all.Is this not wirittan in word of God that had Allah wanted Allah could make all Muslim.If Allah is not bothered then why do you do all such thing.Instead of trying to know about Allah more.

As you do not know where does Allah lives?you can not tell what Gurmat is.

Just one question for you,What is the shape of Allah?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurfateh

2. Are the Sikh Scriptures authentic?

In order for anyone to follow Gods teachings, one must be sure, with absolute certainty and without doubt, that the teachings they are following are authentic. Sikhism has a number of scriptures which they claim are written by Gurus ( and therefore divinely inspired ). However, these scriptures can be proven to have no historical or authentic basis.

Wait who told you that scripture is writtan by Gurus,It was Ihalam of words of God unto Gurus,Bhagats,sufis and Sikhs.

They are Sent by one Eternal Guru called Allah.

Yuo may know that Rasool(SWAS),was illetrate and when Jibrail said Iqra only on thierd time did he had power to comprihend the things.

In the case of Guru,Allah did make knwoldege come into him as Allah wanted.can you say that Allah is bounded by the thing that when Allah says there is Night and it is recored in holy Kuran,If Allah bring day and Allah say there is day,and this ting will be false.

Guru did not do anything but Allah did all.

A. the Janamsakhi

Sikhs claim that the Bhai Bala Janamsakhi was written by Bala Sandhu, a disciple of Guru Nanak. However, Guru Angad, the next Guru in succession, had never heard of Bala Sandhu. In addition to this, Bala Sandhu is not mentioned by Bhai Gurdas. How can Guru Nanaks closest confidants and disciples not know Bala Sandhu?

Are you aware that within the same Sakhi,Bhai Balal narrates to the Second Master.If Bhai Gurdas say did not mention the name of the Father of Guru,then it may not mean that Mehta Kalu did not exists.If he did not mention Rasool(SWAS) or Abdula(Razi) they do not exists.

In Holy Kuran,here could be mnay frineds of or reltive of Rasool who are not mentioned.And if Allah do not talk about them so it is going to be false.Do all Hadiths talk about some of the wives of Rasool(SWAS)?

Do not das go somthing uncalled for and sin.

There are a number of other errors. For example, the rhythmic prose used in the verse was written by the third and fifth Guru’s, so how can this be present chronologically earlier? Also, the language used was not even present in society for over 100 years after the death of Guru Nanak.

prove it.Das has read it.The language is Punjabi or Farsi laden with Arebic.And simlar things were there in other souces like Nasihat Nammah and Karni Naamha and semblence to Landa dialect of that time.

Just by saying lie thuings do not work.say if you say das is son of a pig and your brother,one thing is going to be wrong.The way Guru coomincated with Bhai lalo same way di bala Sandhu used the language.what is writan by Third Master and Fourth Master das wants to see.

But when Bhai Bala was one with God and First to Tenth master were one with God,then what is the problem.source is same.

anyway das will put a more things what that Sakhi says.It says that you people breakc iolds of others but worship stone themselves.

anyway do you know that there are many versions of Bhai Bala Janam Sakhin ajnd which version are you talking about.

Say das can say that there could be version of Holy Kuran,which has stanic verse as its part.Verse in which there has been some glory of some demigods of semtic side,which later were told by Rasol(SWAS) under the influence of Satan,such verse were return so were later emoved.

Say it is hoax and historically proeven.So historically it is preoven by Pracheen Panth Prakash that in order to justfy thier marrige to Muslim girls(whic were offered to them by inavding Afghans/moghuls as proze to oppse Sikhs( a sort of Political prostution previously done by Kharizmin or Faras,with Jamuga ot oppse Taimuza(Genghis Khan) ) and that things failed,all this was done by Hindalis.so if you say Bhai Bala Janam Sakhi as authanitc so do we say am nd you have to agree Satanic verses.

How can it be that a divinely inspired work, detailing the life of the Guru, can be so inaccurate?

Are you aware that Abu Malik(RA) or Abu Hanifa(RA) did came much after Rasol(PBUH) some people say other time while some other.Yuo yourself are intelligent.Are all Hadiths compiled during the time of Rasol(SWAS).

B.The Guru Granth Sahib Ji

Sikhs claim that this book is the “Eleventh†and final Guru, and should be regarded and revered as a Guru. There is even a tale of this book, upon compilation, to be given its own bed whilst a Guru, Guru Arjan slept on the floor!

There is only Guru of Sikhs called Akal,which you call as Allah.Allah manifested self in the form of Verse(Gurbani ) and community(Guru Panth).

Gurubar Akal has 12 forms.And all are one.Final and first,there is one Guru.

Then coming to tails.sorry tale.There is a tale that Hazrat Jainab(Razi) was seen bathing by Rasool(SWAS) bathing.He order that as per Ihlam,let his forster son Tahir(Razi) devorce her and let her marry Rasool(SWAS).

So there is tail that Hazrat Aisha(Razi) was eigth year old when she became wife of Rasool(PBUH).Yuo need to know that all tales das said about Rasool above are false.So it is up to you.Das can give refreanc e to you about tales givne by das.If you say they are false then?

And anyway das has scripture in his cupborard.Can you anyway urinate in the direction of qibla.do you know that as per True Islam,Qibla is in all direction(as per rules or spreiod,two points of it surcfe always meet via great or small eliicpse).Rasool gave such a good faith and you do not know.Qibla says Allah every where.

It is only for welfaer of not only this scripture but we have two more.

For this book to be the 11th Guru, the final way to God and scripture in its own right, surely it would have to be a perfect book, free from errors and contradictions? However, we find that this is not the case. Some errors include :-

should we deem brunt body in our eyesigh coming back to form and life as OK and non errounous.

Das can say yes it can heppen to your creed on the day of Hashr.So if they are Ok then let see which error do you talk.

Teaching God to be “Sargun†(Possessing Attributes) and “Nargun†( Possessing no Attributes).

Ya Allah,Perhaps when Iblis got boom, from Allah even after disobeying Allah for not doing Sizda to Adam(AS),he got it that he will rule the heart.

Sargun means one who has all qulities(gun here is plural) and nirgun means without any particualr qultiy(guna is singualr)..Allah has all qualities so can not said to have only one quality say coulour.

Sare Hathi all elephants here Hathis plural and Ek Hathi or Hathi here one elephant and Elephant is singular.do you know that Arebic has 80 meaning of the same word.Say Bakar may mean cow but may means other things.Harfe Muqat,do you know what do they mean?

Are you sure that you have understood the Islam correclty that you are asking us the question.Soory for you.

Claims there is only one way to God, then says many ways

There is no way to God if we say that we can go to God.But God by self can let us have unite with self in whichever way God wants.

Reincarnation is taught in one section, yet is rejected elsewhere

give the verses rather then just saying.

Allah can let one have reborn or can let one be back with Allah.Do not same do you say as later part when you know about death of some one.

How can it be that a Divinely inspired book, a Guru, a way to God, be so full of contradictions?

If some one wants to imgaine fragmentaion,same can be done with Holy Kuran as some idiots frpm west ry to do.so far you are proven false to preove a single contradiction.

In addition to this, the Book provides no details of the origins of the Earth or of Man, and provides no answers to “where did we come from†as a result. Surely any divinely inspired text would present Gods answer to these questions?

Is Allah has no other work left to just to repeat what was sent in Kateebs previously so that one person like yourself will come and ask about the same things.

Anyway are you sure that things in Bible (3Katebs) are in concormity with Holy Kuran?

God did not want us to know so god did not provide us any fairy tail.We were told that from creator gases occur,from gases did fliud came and from fulid universe was created.

and there are mnay skys and mnay niether worlds unlike you 7 only.what is about 7th and what is below 7th.Allah and in the body of allah so mnay things are there you do not know.

We are told that all creation is manifestaion of Allah.That is when ever Allah wants unverese is created and wheneve does Allah want man is created.wehnever Allah wants them to go back,Allah destroyes them.

Are you sure that this creation is frist creation by Allah?Can you gurante that Allah will not destoy Hevan and hell after creation?Are you ready to do Shirk by saying that you have power or you book has such power to let Allah follow that and not self will of Allah.Did Allah created Katebs or Katebs created Allah?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurfateh

3. How can Re-Incarnation be Accurate?

Is Allah bounded by any rule that Allah can not one person have next body,when Ginnis can enter human body(Iblis is also a ginni).

Yuo want to act as controler of the Allahs action.Allah will take care of you on Qayamat.

In Sikhism, it is the belief that through righteous deeds one achieves salvation, and a “oneness†with God. The main method of this is through “karmaâ€, or the reward of your efforts in this life being rewarded in the next, and so on and so on until spiritual union with God is achieved.

This happens in so called present day pseudo Islam,There by doing good works person,gets Jannat or else hell.

Where is it writtan in Sikh religeon.Mad people thinks other all are mad.

As per our doctrine.Allah created all from self.and will one day take all back in self.Deeds of humans are not in control of Man but Allah controls them.If allah want person know that all is allah and person is one with allah,it state of Salvation being alive,state if Haq Haq Agah or Holy Ghost.do not you know Allah ho Baqi Bin Tul e Fani.only allah will reamin and all are desructable.Allah made all and Allah is omni potan to destroy all.Including the human spritis.

If Allah wants rebirth occur else wait till Harsh thence temprary Jannat or Dojhakh till allah want them to reamain.

Though this sounds like a nirvana of sorts, it is completely non-sensical. Reincarnation cannot possibly be true as :-

That is in budhism,but thinking a gardon created by God and rivers of milk anf hony(more imgination of desert guy seems to be rational).

god creates Jannat and anything which is having form came to form by will of allah and Allah can destroy that.Allah ho Akbar,the God is Biggest,Big(Kabir) then any ideolgy.

How can the world be in decline, when spiritual karma is meant to increase and improve the world?

term Karam here refer to Arebic term of Karam by with allah is said to be Kareem.We talk of Mercy of allah if person is salvaged.May Allah have some Karam on you.

What is the source for evil originally?

who blessed the Iblis?who let Iblis let loose?who can when ever that want can control Iblis?Allah.answer to all question of your is Allah.

Who was the original evildoer according to Sikhism, and which sent a perpetual evil through the earth, increasing its trials?

yuo got the answer,Evil and Good are under command of Allah.

Iblis was made by Allah and empowered by Allah and allowed by allah to commit evil.Veryly Allah is in full control.

There is no justice in re-incarnation, as you become a new entity, with no recollection of a past life.

Are you sure that person does not know about past life?If allah want,person can think about the timmme when his Sprit ws made.Das does not want to say the name of Hazrat mansur (RA).It is your bias that Allah can not let this happen or allah is bouneded by any logic.

Therefore, it is the entity that is being unfairly punished, and not you.

Allah nevr punishes any one.Pain and soorw or evil or good or joy all are brought upon by allah and we need to thank Allah in all situations.

Why are there more bodies on earth now, than there was before? Where do these new Souls emerge from?

Allah is the only soul,Allah can make as mnay bodies and as mnay spirits.

Re-incarnation is therefore absurd, and cannot be correct because it does not agree with rationality.

So is Allah bound by rationlity.

Das would ask you a question about rationaity.

Das ate fish,who had eaten flesh of badger,who had eaten flesh of dead body in grave.so Who will be reborn in Qayamat,the das or the one whose dead body was eaten by badger,who was eaten by fish and who was eaten by das.

Within your body Allah knows how mnay times did carbon,nitroejn or xoygen or hydgrzen might have been recycled from other bodies of human,hoppee,fish and what not.

Who will be reborn on last day of judglement or Qayamat?So what is rationaity over there.If matter can passes various bdois why can not sprit do that?

Yuo talk rationity?Perhaps body of das may have some elements recycled after decay of body of any of you Imam.Se the power of Allah.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurfateh

4. How can God be Omnipotent and within Evil?

As God is ominpotan1 so God let evil exists.If God does not want Evil to exists and evil exists,then god can not be ominipotant.

For Sikhs to state that God is “all pervading and is in all directions. God is omniscient, omnipotent and loves allâ€, what does that mean?

In Sura 2 God is said to be in East as well in west.

In Sura 5 allah is said to contain all.Waht does it mean?

Firstly how can God be in everything? Would God be in Impure things such as Excreta?

Yes in the form of excerta god provides manure to wheat and rice and dates also,Which mnay of you holy men might have eaten.

not only does in excerta provide manure but as Excerta purifys our body with undesirealve things.

Secondly, how can God be within everyone? What is the point, according to Sikhism, of trying to attain Union with God, when God is already within us according to their scriptures? How can God be within people and objects which are intrinsically evil?

who mad all the things?Allah

who made all creatrues includeing Satan?Allah

who made all thoughts in mind evil or good?Allah.

who made minds which can have evil or goodm thoughts ?Allah

Allah made all.Had there anything not made by Allah but some one else then Allah is not the creator and Shirk is there and you are Musriq.

Does Allah has body?If so then where did Allah stood to do creation?And who made that place?Allah by self light(Nur) or visible form of energy did created matter which further made time and space.

Do not know you Khaliq nor you know Wahadat Al Wazood,glory/light of God in all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurfateh

5. How can Sikhs claim to have a complete way of Life?

life is in hand of Allah and let guide us.

Sikhism is claimed to be a complete way of life, but Sikhism does not have the answers from their scriptures for the following questions :-

Should we ask about if Islam as per you is complete way of life.then why should girls do Hizab?In Islam there is no other provision that by worship Allah,lust in controled that even without veil if we see Lady there is not lust.

does it justfy that followers of such pseudo Islam have no control on the lust so ladies should ocnceal themselves?Answer?

How much tax should I pay in a Sikh State, as a Non-Sikh?

we have concept of Dhimmi or Zazia.God is as in me as in you.so no differance or discrinantion between Sikh or non Sikh,it is in your creed.Sikh himself is free to pay Tenthy or n ot and norhting like forced Jakat.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding testimony in a court?

No discromination between Sikh or non Sikh as witness.Presently you do not follow testmony of non Muslim in Islamic court.Yuo forget that Rasool(SWAS) once punshed Muslim and sided with Jew in a case.That jew became Momin.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding the sentence for stealing?

Reform 1st.Repetation can lead to seclusion that also for refrom.

Not the foreced conversion to Islam or cutting the hands.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding the age of maturity?

not 8 years as in you.

But when child is found to carry out taks by self.Depending upon the qility of child.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding my relations with my neighbour?

See God in nieghbur as to se God in all.As das sees Allah in you.Playing with Das.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding how I should treat an animal?

We should not slit the throat and carry out Halal and if at all have to kill then kill by single blow.God is there in animal but Humans come first.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding lawful earnings?

Unlawafull earning in Sikhs like Pork to you and beef to Hindu Father of Das.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding killing a non-Sikh and the punishment for that?

Punishment to Sikh commtiong bad work is more then to say for non Sikh.Sikh avoid fight and kill attcker only after compelled.

What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding riding a horse?

God to leanr horse riding but first to over come the mind which goes bersake like wild horse as das sees in your mind.

What is the ruling in Sikhism if I use a nuclear weapon?

did Rasolmade any Hadith to tell you operation mannual of balastic missles or to use contraceptives,As you your self has to deicede.

anyway We let you first use nuke on us.We nip that in bud,.and then if compllled then only use that.We like to breake stone.and qibla is one of the stone,.

Sikhism only covers prayer and religious obligations. It has no understanding of how to interact with the real world. It has no detailed economic system, social system, or ruling system.

Man you have so far not read Dasham Granth and Sarbloh Granth so you say like that.there anyway many things in Darbar SahibJi also which make us to bring the spritual things in preactice and not to be hypocrates like others.say to serve all as we serve God without any wish for retrun.

so you want to say you Islam is matterilistic thing and least of sprituality.That means

you say that western scholars are true when they say that your type of Islam is more an arebic nationalist movement.

you rather go after decayble ecomnmy ,rule,socity etc. and not for eternal Allah.There seems no difeerance between you and Kureshis of mecca ,who troubloed Lord Hajur Rasol(SWAS)

Sikhism is not alone in this. There is no belief in the entire world, except Islam, that has the answers to problems that mankind encounter on a day to day basis.

So deutrinomy of Hazrat Musa(AS) is false(part of Old Testment).and various codes by Hindus and Rahitnammahs by Sikhs you do not know are false.

Say if you want to say that there can not be sea and water of the well in which you live like frog is the only water of the world.It is up to you.

In Islam, the Qu’ranic verses on Society outnumber verses on individual worship many times over.

Man all of them sing glory of allah over matter.

In the hadith books, only 3 or 4 chapters relate to ibadaat ( individual worship ), whilst over 100 chapters in Bukhari relate to muamalaat ( societal transactions
).

As oper mnay of your Muslims they may not be OK.so do we have 72 +.....+..Sharas by now.Do not you feel ashamed when you preach worldly temporary things over eteranal Allah's glory and further want to prove that as Kuran and other scripture Islam is matterialistics.

Islam contains a complete ruling, economic, social and ritual system, applicable to all times and places because it is from the Creator, Allah (SWT), your God and my God.

well if you are in arectic cirecle with all water around.Frokm where will you get mud to rub on your place of urine after you urinate.Yuo commit a sin.Or rather you defination is false over there.

In Desert where there is no wood or metal,how will you circense you girl or boy child?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...