Azrael

8 hours ago, jaikaara said:

Some Mahapurush even mentioned Raja Janak as one of the Panj Pyare..i read it somewhere donit remember now. It a good way to connect with Bhagats and Devtas is what i feel.

Do you have a source brother? I had heard that someone had once said Guru Nanak Dev Ji was Raja Janak but we know that's not a possibility.

3 hours ago, Soulfinder said:

As Daas is listening to Baba Ji's Katha Mahapursh Ji are mentioneing the Panj Piaras previous lifes avtars which i will write down and hopefully discus and sangat is welcome to add views to this.

 Bhai Daya Singh Is a avtar of Ram Chander's son Luv

Bhai Dharam Singh is a Bhagat from Delhi (couldn't understand it)

Bhai Himmat Singh is from jagannath puri satyug (couldn't understand it)

Bhai Mohkam Singh is dwarka (couldn't understand it)

Bhai Sahib Singh  is sain bhagat de avatar

Bhai Mokham Singh Ji was the avtar of Bhagat Namdev Ji I think that's what Sant Ji said, Bhai Dharam Singh Ji was Bhagat Dhanna Ji 's avtar and Bhai Himmat Singh Ji (i had trouble understanding it totally too)

The learned man can represent a Gurmukh, He's the master of religious texts and a man of God. The woman represents Maya in this context represents the way Maya tries to snare those who are trying to (or on their way to god), the Raja is old and since the raja is at the top of the hierarchy he represents someones mind.  Here Maya is attempting to ensnare the Gurmukh and the Raja is  satisfied by Maya's response of why this event has occurred. She's trying to be a friend but is actually the enemy. To the Raja it seems that she's attempting to preserve the Brahmin's honour but in actuality she's out to defame him. Hence why the Raja is happy with this response. 

We see Maya and try to rationalise it, but that form of rationalisation of something wrong (anything in this context) is a spiritual hindrance. Rather than admit the mistake (or the incident) we attempt to make sense of it in a way to comfort us.