Laal Singh

On 7/29/2023 at 4:21 AM, Premi said:

Agree most of what you say, but Why does Gurbani talk of Punn and Paap then Veer Ji? 

Everything happens as per His plan.

Within this grand plan, on a temporal level, we get advice from the Guru about right and wrong to help us make decisions.

But does this mean that people who don't know any better are going against His plan?

NO, not in the overall scheme of things, but YES, according to temporal religious and spiritual rules.

On 7/29/2023 at 1:17 PM, GurjantGnostic said:

Pedos?

What does that mean?

As years go by, it is becoming evident that there is no paap, punn, good deed, bad deed. All in One, One in All. Everybody is God, God is everybody. A beautiful tamasha going on.

On 3/26/2023 at 2:14 PM, GurjantGnostic said:

Those places have Kal. Akal lives in Akal. Sachackand always will have been unchanged. 

Yes, in that way, everything, whole sargun roop, all creation, our thoughts about Akal, our attempts to reach Him, are under kaal. Anything that comes to imagination too is under kaal. Bliss (Anand) too is under kaal.

Nothing is immutable, but it never ends.

ਅਕਾਲ ਮੂਰਤਿ and ਸਾਹਿਬ ਮੇਰਾ ਨੀਤ ਨਵਾ together.

On 10/17/2021 at 6:57 PM, SunnySingh said:

what is difference between Baikunth and Sachkhand

Very important observation. Baikunth, Shivpuri, Heavens or other metaphysical places, are those man made? Not made by regular men, but by Sadhus or Jogis or Tappasvis after reaching a avstha? Like Vishwamittar made its own heaven. 

On 11/5/2008 at 6:11 PM, amardeep said:

If the creative aspect of God is the Sargun, and the unchanging aspect is nirgun, how does this fit in with logic? As soon as God starts to create, then he has become a Creator, hereby he is no longer "unchanging" as he has changed from the unchanging to the changed by taking a new attribute (creator). Would'n that dismiss the nirgun quality.

While macroscopic objects have observable properties, it is not accurate to assume that subatomic particles possess the same qualities. Even when macrosopic objects are made up of subatomic particles, subatomic particles never lose their own properties.

On 2/9/2007 at 12:51 PM, Mekhane'ch Jannat said:

knowledge and experience what is the correct mixture must depend upon what is the aim. Following on from the previous analogy the lake could be our society and the evils and good contained within. So to cross the lake is to be an effective integrated member of society - the mesocosm. This is part of crossing, so to slightly change the analogy our society is the river we must flow with to get to the sea. you -microcosm river - mesocosm and sea - macrocosm each level is absorbed into the higher so the macrocosm absorbs all, is all (please anyone correct this if have got myself confused.) For me the aim is going along with the flow to take you to the sea. How much knowledge does an individual need to be able to go with the flow? This depends on the current of the river which is the society. If the current is strong it is difficult to go against it and it will take you without much effort to the sea the society is attuned to the flow then what knowledge is needed? But if the society is going aganist the flow and the flow is weak then a lot of knowledge is needed to realise that what you are doing is against the flow and you have to attune yourself to nature to let her take you to the sea. Herein is the danger of knowledge whereby without using this knowledge to change fundamentally, internally it makes you fight harder against the current. In other words sadh sangat negates the need for knowledge if the whole society was full of sadhu's then no knowledge is required, knowledge required for moksh rises proportionally with social degredation. Or the need for moksh comes about because of social degredation?

It looks like there is no end to levels, upward or downward. But we only progress upwards. This is an endless infinite universe, always expanding. 

There is no free will. Even us while deciding and doing an act under the impression of our false and temporary ego, in reality, it is Him. There is not even will, leave aside the free will. It is all One.

“Naam” is being used in a spiritual or religious context to refer to the divine presence of the Creator in the created world. In this context, “Naam” is seen as eternal and transcending the temporal reality of the changing universe.

The concept of “Naam” can indeed be seen as a way to connect with the divine or the unreachable Lord. Full knowledge of the Lord or the divine is beyond human comprehension or direct experience, and therefore, difficult to reach or connect with.

And in this ever-changing universe, Naam is the only permanent and accessible truth.

Pavan represents spirituality, something that can't be seen and but exists as Satguru is. It is metaphysical. Gurbani is not teaching us science. Invisible but existing things can be called Pavan.

Pani is the material in this Newtonian reality to shape our bodies. 

The energy he is referring to is not sexual energy, but creative energy. It could go toward sex as sexual acts are parts of procreation. The whole function of sex is procreation. It is rampant while we are young and it depletes as we grow older. The same energy could be used for other positive and noble reasons. Channelling your whole energy towards sexual acts is like wasting your anmol manukh janam.

Is anima mundi and Satguru (Sargun aspect of God) same?

"The anima mundi (Greek: ψυχὴ κόσμου, psychè kósmou) or world soul is, according to several systems of thought, an intrinsic connection between all living beings, which relates to the world in much the same way as the soul is connected to the human body." 

There is only one entity ever evolving with living beings as a physical body and network of brains as a soul or mind. 

Most of these weird experiences are false signals. Might have eaten something OR if you are sensitive, people with wrong aura could affect you temporarily.

3 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Well at the foundation of Harmandir Sahib the Sakhi says the Angel of the Lord,  God in body, shows up. And for Bhai Santokh Singh, he goes into a stasis to reach Kalyug where God can be found in flesh. 

God in a body? Ain't duality?

But mortals are His hands in this temporal reality. He is the doer, but not separate entity.

When Carl Jung spoke about collective consciousness, was it Lord's Sargun Roop he is referring to?

Because collective consciousness would have all the possible virtues and whole material world at its disposal. Sargun Roop can pop up any longing, desire in one of the subject's consciousness and get things done. 

HItler and Mohamad are gone. Bodies perished. Their minds may still be in collective somewhere, if they have not taken another birth somewhere. 

But why would they come here? 

Famous Jatana militants were from this village. Their whole family including kids and elders were killed by Poohla in '90s.