mahanpaapi

2 minutes ago, sarabatam said:

Dhan Dhan Dhan Sant Isher Singh Ji Maharaj Barsi- Anmol Diamond of Bhai Dya Singh Ji Samparda

Not Barsi Bheta jee, tomorrow, is His arrival day in maatlok jee!

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nanaksar-sundar-gutka/id1123886256

6 hours ago, Singh2022 said:

1. Do you realise what the real terrorists and their successors have done to Sikhs in the 39years since? Many more times than 5,000 innocent Sikhs have died in response to that anti-Gurmat threat made by JSB.

2. Gurmat does not permit any Sikh on the planet to even utter such bogus threats full stop.

3. We all know that Indira Gandhi was the real terrorist. But she was delighted with the threat to kill 5,000 innocent Hindu's in one hour as it allowed her to paint 15million Sikhs ALL as psychopathic deranged terrorists.

4. So if Justin Trudeau or Joe Biden threaten to kill 5,000 innocent Sikhs in one hour then you are fine with that?

When Indira Gandhi killed 5,000 innocent Sikhs in one hour in June 1984 you were ok with that? 

When Slavemaster rapist Profit Muhammad murdered 1,000 innocent non-Muslims in a day from the Banu Qurayzah tribe you are ok with that?

Essentially if Muslim leaders, Christian leaders and Hindu leaders carry out repeated Genocide against hundreds of millions of innocents then you think our so-called leaders should join the party and ignore Gurmat?

That's what he said, full picture. you are free to have your opinions.

Sant Ji gave this speech on 20th Sep, 1983 at Diwan Hall, Manji Sahib. Here is complete transcript of the speech:

The comment about 'killing 5000 hindus' was not made to provoke attacks against Hindus. Sant Ji were merely replying to an earlier comment made by Indira, something on the lines of 'Sikhs are only handful in number, and when the time comes it would no problem to 'control' them'. What Sant Ji were implying was that Sikhs do not provoke violence against anyone, but if continuous attacks against them are launched again and again, both phsycially and verbally, then Sikhs wont sit quiet.

Sant Ji: "Why was the word 'Hindu' used? I do not have any animosity against Hindus. If that was the case then I would not have rescued Hindu's daughter from Jalalabad. Hindu Hukam Chand's daughter was forcefully abducted by a Hindu youth. He (Hukam Chand) came on the stage and screamed and wept in front of a gathering of 10 thousand, and said: "Sant Ji, you are sevadar of Damdami Taksaal. In puratan times Sikhs would rescue abducted Hindu girls. A hindu has abducted my young daughter...". If I had any bias in my heart, Id have said to him, "Get off the stage and tell this to Hindus." But no, because a Sikh's duty is:

Nanak Naam Chardi Kalaa,

Tere Bhaane Sarbat Da Bhalaa

I followed this very principle. I was speaking on stage at 12:00 noon, at Jalalabad, near Fazilka. I said to him, your daughter will come back home before 5pm, but only if what you said is true, and that there is no other reason. And, Mahinder Singh Sayeean Wale was given this duty by daas..., Khalsa Ji, the girl was rescued and sent to that Hindu's home at 4:45pm.

There is one shopkeeper named Kailash Chander nearby, his shop had caught fire. Shopkeeper's Union enticed him to name Bhindranwala behind the arson, but he did not. Two Sikhs, and one Hindu, 3 of them came to see me in my room. He started crying. I said, "What is the matter? Why are you crying?" He said, "Ji, my shop has been burnt." I said, "Ask what you want." He said, "If you could give me 100 rupees, that will give me a reason to ask for donations." He was given 500 rupees.

A copy of Ramayan caught fire in Kapurthala, the leader of that place was given 5 thousand rupees by Damdami Taksaal.

Two hindus got Shaheed on 4th in the 'Raah Roko' work. 10 thousand rupees were given by Akali Dal and Shromani Committee.

Then, why do they (Indira, press) say I cause divisions?"

23 hours ago, paapiman said:

Sant jee gave an explanation on why he made that comment later on.

 

Do you have clip of that explanation? or what He said?

thanks jee.