Jump to content

Infernal Monk

Members
  • Posts

    401
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Infernal Monk

  1. what was wrong with palm's post? He means some Sikhs were killed simply for being amrithdhari, they were automatically called terrorists because they were amritdhari. No where in his post does he mention or refer to Khalistan. And he said some Hindus killed Sikhs, what exactly is the problem here?

    No offense Bruce but it seems you have some preconceptions of people that are Sikh and speak out about 84...even though they are talking about the riots and such afterward in which innocent people suffered (not talking about khalistanis). You seem overly paranoid about everything, even when your fellow Sikhs mention 84; yet you are fiercely loyal to GOI....

  2. I dont hate Hindus ....i got some Hindu friends actually (not proud of that ...lol) because I aint dumb enough to paint all the people with the same colour ......but dont like people who try to rewrite history ..... and are sellouts ...it hurts more when its your own people ..... never mind ..... and there were alot of hindus that killed Sikhs ..... why you afraid to admit it..... the majority cried when indira was shot .....why ?? that woman was evil to Sikhs and to her own people aswell.......

    right, I thought that was a given...I know Sikhs sufferred more than anyone...no need to tell me..I was just stating that there were bad Sikh elements as well. I'm not trying to rewrite history...and I'm not afraid to admit shit...Indira was a admin cut and I would have killed her myself...

  3. I agree that 84 and times were real bad...and WE NEED JUSTICE...but to all people that hate Hindus...ya'll fucked up.

    Sorry, but hating Hindus or blaming 84 on Hindus is just wrong...and yes there were "sikh" terrorists killing Hindus....Let's get justice and live in peace...

    Besides back in Punjab some of our best family friends are Hindu...oh and my dad prolly wouldn't be here if it wasn't for his HINDU friends...damn...too much hate people

  4. no doubt about that. i totally agree with what you're saying.

    but i think the point is that there's a fine line between what's acceptable and what isn't. how do we ascertain what we can accept and what we can't?

    and if we don't make attempts to stop such degrading comments at a small scale, do we risk allowing them to snowball into something bigger?

    i have no set stance on what happened, so i'm merely representing the other side of things.

    no worries same here, i like to consider arguments for both sides...

  5. you all love my threads..hehe...besides, on a serious note, I see what Bruce is saying, but I agree generalizing is wrong. You have good points bro, but White people now are different...oh and by the way they will soon be gone...

    Statistically Indians and Chinese make up half the world pop. and Euro's aren't making enough babies to replace themselves...lol...we taken over in different ways...

  6. The argument everyone uses...is that we aren't expressing our outrage, but have some one remrimand him for it..

    That and Xians are made fun of here, so are jews, but ask why special treatment...I mean Jesus is on South Park assasinating Iraqis...how would you all feel if someone did that with um..Guru Nanak? But no one does that cause they will be stopped, but what about Xians

    just playing devil's advocate. :wink:

  7. yes I get that...but what I'm trying to do right now is read the manual...but you are telling me to reach realization (which includes manual and actually doing the work).

    I can't read the manual, so i come here for help, and I get you must experience it...but you see i'm still at my original porb of not being able to read the manual...sorry but this answer sounds like a cop out.

  8. No monk you misunderstood. I was agreeing with you. Why did those people become sikhs? And what sort of sikhs welcome them, apart from NRI khalistanis anyway? you don't see such banners featuring hindus who profess to follow sikhism. it's the same old traitors' tactic of preferring the angrez to their own.

    i don't trust them at all.

    this I agree with...desis have this thing about white people...I don't get it..

    Also, I don't exactly hold 3HO in high regard either....seems kinda cultish to me...

    And I agree, we don't see posters of Hindus who became Sikhs, because I don't see the point...What is the difference between a true Hindu, and a true Sikh? Besides you shouldn't have some superiority complex in Sikhi.

    Why is it necesary to show White, or ever Hindu Sikhs? Because you wanna say, look who converted to our faith?

    If you wanna make a banner representing those that follow Sikhi, then 99.9% should be brown as that holds true to current statistics (or close to).

×
×
  • Create New...