Jump to content

GABROO KHALISTAN DAH

Members
  • Posts

    209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GABROO KHALISTAN DAH

  1. dogs have b'n domesitc for ever, if we started thinking along those lines..the khalsa fauj would have all b'n on foot, not on horse back

    like dogs have b'n domesitacated for 10,000 odd yrs now......

    so what i mean is that sikhi teaches us to respect animals and care for the.

    REad the constituiton of khalistan regarding animal rights

    so what is the gneral sangats view

  2. i do not trust the sgcp, and theres no way in hell that i would trust sarbloh.com. as it directly contradicts the bhudda dal website,, which i will try hard to re-allocate

    sarbloh.com = indian agent.com

    tha's the truth, i found that really ez to digest

    a sikh is one who belives in everythign about sikhi wihtout doubt, and udahsis are not that, sorry veer ji

    2 be taken with a grain of salt ( not sure of context)

  3. veer n30 what i'm gion to say is not desrespectfull to u so plz dont' take it wrong :$

    but i dont' think baba sir chaand wuz given rite to start a seperate religion udasis, they can recite maharaj all they want, as do the rss but that does'nt make them sikhs

    i'm pretty sure that they where outcasted by dhun guru nanak dev ji maharaj

  4. UDASIS, IS'NT THAT THE RELIGION STARTED OF BY DHUN GURU NANAK DEV JI'S BROTHER?

    out of jelousy of not being appointed next guru?

    and was'nt it declared tanhai tankya back then???

    why do these brit "nihungs" say its part of sikhi when SIKHI DE GURU JI DHUN GURU NANAK DEV JI, said they were'nt part of sikhi 500 yrs ago??

  5. narsingha stop spreading hate, and shit for the indian goverment, at the end realise u are here cause of sikhisim, so don't become a chela and bow as an agent

    i can't find the link but the bhudda dal, not fake dal england as a website and it shows the truth, vegeterniamsim...... but meat is acceptable, every nihung dal as shunned bhung...but we have narsinghas website promoting it, i wonder why?

    nar singha, if u know jathedar akali nihung baba nihal singh ji khalsa, u will now that there is no other way but that of khalistan.....

    bikram jit and sukh have said it correct, u r a giddar, a coward, a gaoo

    stop splitting this split up quam further with ur mess'd up cultic views which go against ne rehit maryada out there, cept for the one that dwells in u.

    if ur such a nihung, u must be without ne attatcmenets or posseccions yet u ail to use of a computer hmmm

    damn i c it shining in u

    KHALISTAN ZINDAAAAAAABAAAAAD

  6. and if sikhi is followed correctly, u will c that there will be no shunning women, so don't say thats a sikh thing, thats a cultural, man freak control thing.....

    sikhi does'tn c man or woman, it Cs KHALSA

    but as some1 stated we came to this world to enjoy life...every1 has a different idea of what "enjoying" is...

    i think a true khalsa will find doing seva, naam simiran as the extreem end of enjoyment....something u can't get bored off and can do for hours or days or even damn yrs on end..or for ur whole life

    yet some ppl find bhangra as pleausre, which is well and good, but unlike iwth seva and other sikhi-related activities is that 1 does tend to get bored, and also go beyond just that activites and fall into lust and shunned on desires such as drinkign and drugs....so with things of such calibre there must be a very high level of self control, and in the end of the day, one should remember god, not what u did last night......

    i'm sorry i dunno i think i may have went off topic, or even lost my topic, if there wuz one

  7. its juss the over all image, as u all know i am 100% fundementle, without actually acting on it, i believe in every thing in sikhi bar none....down to the fact that as a non-amritdhari/shasterdhari, u r not a sikh.

    but as soon as some ppl, start saying bhangra, makeup, or ne thing other then phaat shoudl be shut down is wrong, iv'e heard it many times...tha's whats soo different about sikhi, it allows freedom of actions, obviously rah rah di gal ah, so what i'm trying to say is that, with creation of khalistan which i sooo deraly want the only thing that worries me is this.... will there be to much control on the public as far as non-sikhi is related, sikhi wise, no doubt, governing like all countries do no doubt, but the only thing that owrriez me is that all luxiries etc other then naam (the greatest of luxaries) will be banned.

    Now plz no1 take my words to heart, its not directed at ne one is specific, and if ne one feels so, i sinceraly apologize

    KHALISTAN....................ZINDABAAD

×
×
  • Create New...