Jump to content

Crystal

Members
  • Posts

    292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Crystal

  1. ​Bro, non-amritdharis are patit according to Gurmat. Harnaam Kaur is an amritdhari. Patits can shave as much as they want.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Amritdharis can't drink. Why does she? 

     

    Well I always thought a patit was someone who breaks his amrit by doing a bujjar K....Any members take on what a patit is defined as?

  2. I may have the wrong end of the stick and I beg your pardon if I do,but seems like a lot of your posts seem to doubt sikhi & our beliefs and traditioms. It seems like you believe it as a backward way of thought or something ? Or have I got it wrong? Join the sulleh and see how they view women(&western world) You would come running back to the panth. 

     

    Crystal meth

  3. Chaaaa, fire bun. 

     site named "Poet Warrior" commented:

    "The dasam granth is the most anti-female book in Indian history. One half of the book is devoted to stories of great vulgarity. These stories depict females as a filthy, conniving and depraved sex. The stories are explicitly designed to psychologically condition men to hold females in contempt and accord them vile treatment."

    treatment

     

    Chaaaa. Fire ah blaze wicked man. No space in the promised land for fools who think that above. 

     

    CrystalCrystal

     

    Ps. Happy reggae Thursday sangat ji or should I say ya bloooodclarts

     

  4. ​Bro, Monay/Dharri Katuye get enough rights in Gurudwaras. They can get married in gurudwaras, get siropas (utter disgusting act), langar seva, etc. I am talking, from a Canadian perspective.

    Keeping kesh is the bare minimum requirement in Gurmat. One should not make keeping kesh look like a humongous task. Achieving peace of mind is way way way tougher than keeping kesh.

    If we start getting flexible with the basics of our religion, then we will be in, for big big trouble. 

    Having said the above, we must deal with patits respectfully. We must not show any pride in being amritdhari in front of them and look down upon them. Do prachaar in a humble and polite way, so that they get attracted towards khanday da amrit.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    But your posts in the other topic clearly show you are looking down on non amritdhari as inferior to amritdharis? Why change of tone now??

  5. Isn't this because we've tried to trap Sikhi in a box and not understood the real thing? Haven't we reduced Sikhi to grow hair and Amrit (sanskar)? or may be it's just the effect of Mind/Kaal because it is said in Bhagat Kabir's Anurag Sagar that whenever any Saint/Guru will come to earth for the betterment of mankind, then Kaal will try everything to derail that stream....

     

    Vahhhhhh, amazing post brother!

  6.  

    I feel Singh Sabha movement Punjabised the Panth ..what was loosely connected with its diversities is now expected to follow a uniform whitewashed order.

    This is one good reason what makes me visit Takhat Hazoor Sahib time and again, ..we see tribal Lambada, Sikalgar , Wadari, Banjara and Bijnori presence there.

    I have noticed newly married Banjara sehajdhari couples coming there to do matha teko .

    The Hazooris accept them with their differences as long as they dont do any kurehits in the asthaan premises .

     

     

     

     

    The Singh sabha movement made many original Sikhs no longer feel accepted, as they would have to take amrit or keep kesh to be defined as a Sikh. Many didn't but followed the house of Nanak.

     

    Could you please go a bit further in explaining the last comment please "kurehits in asthaan", like what exactly?

     

     

     

  7. 1. Post 20th century the Singh Sabha mindset has hurt the 'Sikh' numbers by sidelining and ignoring the Sehajdharis and Nanakpanthis.

    For example: There was  a time when nearly all non Muslim Sindhis were Nanakpanthis, but the radicalisation post Singh Sabha made them move away. Ofcourse many of them also venerated Jhule Lal besides Guru Nanak Ji but still.

    Years ago I was also shocked at the 2001 census having only 20k Sikhs for Bihar, the birth place of Guru Gobind Singh. But since I have discovered that Bihar once had a quite significant population of Sikhs (Nanakpanthis), which withered due to our own neglect and partly the Udasi sadhus 'reverting' to Hinduism post SGPC to prevent their Dharamshalas from getting under SGPC control.
    Even today some indigenous Sikhs of Bihar can be found near Lakhmipur and other areas visited by Guru Tegh Bahadur.

    2. I also used to believe that most Sikhs inhabiting foreign countries were of Punjabi descent, but I think a critical reading of the Janamsakhis is needed to ascertain this. The person who gave the elephant to Guru Gobind Singh Ji was a native Assami King, his ancestors having converted at the times of Guru Nanak.  The Raja Shivnabh of Sri Lanka also converted. More than a hundred Nanakpanthi native Arab families existed in 1930, Sikh since Guru Nanaks times (source: Mushtaq Hussain alias Prithpal Singh). Remember Salas Rai Johri the jeweller? His descendants are Nanakpanthis but in dire need of parchaar just like many other tribes and people but our SGPC is doing nothing, in a few generations they will also be back to Hinduism. Bihar used to have above 300 Dharamshalas, all with native Bihari Sikhs, such as Bhai Bhagwan during Guru Har Rais time (ex Buddhist).

    While one may not take this statement too seriously but the Dabistan also talks of Sikhs living in most corners of the world. But you could argue that it talked of Punjabi Sikhs, which I doubt but fair enough.

    3. So from the above we can assume that lots of non Punjabi Sikhs used to exist. But where did they all go?

    a) reverted back over generations due to lack of parchaar, just as we are seeing right now with Johris.

    b) many of them were not in Khalsa form and thus were neglected
     

    4. We did not forcibly convert others. While forcing is the un Sikh way, I wish more was done to convert non Sikhs during the Misl and Ranjit Singh Kaal, but sadly we are too secular... We are even butt hurt at ex Sikh Christians returning back to Sikhi to avoid political disturbances in Punjab. This explains why we are only 10-20% of the total Punjabi population.

    5. Indian census is not reliable, they do not count poor tribal Sikhs as Sikhs, who are atleast 2-3 million in number. Search for Sikligar, Vanjara, Lobana, Johri, etc.

     

     

    Wow....first time I can say I agree with your points. 

     

     

  8.  

    3. Parents are responsible too, if children are not in sikhi, it is most likely a reflection of parents. Mothers specially (don't get feminist on me), I believe most of us who are in sikhi are because of our mothers with strong sikh roots. Her spending a lot of childhood years with you affects your way of life.

     

    Strongly disagree with this point. 

  9. It's Sikhs like you who make my blood boil with your self righteous shit just because you have taken amrit. Let me hit you with reality, taking amrit is the first step not the last so stop making it out like that.

    We are all equal in the eyes of maharaj, we are one panth. stop trying to segregate us!!!!

     

    How many non khalsas have their life for the panth? Or are you going to dismiss that and come out with some BS like "oh they will be reborn as khalsa".

     

    I find your bhul chak marf posts a bit annoying esp when you post crap like what you said, you just want a slap..happy to give you sajja little boy. 

     

  10. ​Still bro, I won't mind a mona (patit) asking me about my caste, but it will hurt if a Singh asks.  A mona or a patit cannot be classified as a Sikh, so he can ask such a question. Not a big deal.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    I think you have DISGUSTING views if you really believe with what you saidsaid above. A Mona cannot be classified as a Sikh? Who gives you the right? 

     

    Crystal

  11. ​Was he a Singh? If not, then it is fine. 

    A Sikh should never ask another Sikh, his/her caste.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    What has if he was Singh or not got to do with it? We are the followers of the same Satguru right, so.............

     

    Crystal

  12. What I'd to discuss is the medical perspective of the issue. Should Sikhs see hormone imbalances as natural events to accept - or a potential medical issue that needs dealing with if possible?

     

    Medical issue which needs dealing with.

    I know this isn't the right comparison, but if someone had an issue with a growth on a part of their body would they let it be & seek pity or get medical helphelp?

     

    Crystal

×
×
  • Create New...