Sher Singh

Prithviraj Raso  was completed by the son of Chand Bardai   after the suicide of his father. Afghans too knowledge that Guari was killed by Prithviraj Chauhan. The proof is his Samadhi in Afganistan and Tradition of Afgans to show their anger on it.

Respected sirs!
What you read above is what we get from popular history which was written by muslim historian and made popular by British... actually none of the Rajput queens were captured there was a tradition of ritual of "jouhar" { jumping in fire pits}  performed by females in the palace in case their husbands fail to win. because they could not capture the queens which was considered to be a enjoyable part of victory they wrote in frustrations pure lies...writing some beautiful indian woman who were common subject unfortunate to get caught as "queens" It is a lie as big as the lie that Prithviraj chauhan was killed in the battle by Ghori...actually Prithviraj killed Ghori at his palace a truth untold by muslim history writers of ghori's court who also wrote Ghori marrying Padmavati is also a lie written by them becuse Ghori was not alive at all to marry!
 
 Finally learnt the proof of what I was hearing since childhood being grown up in Rajsthan here http://www.thedailyxpress.com/hot-topics/prithivirajs-death-mystery-unbeaten/
So, The Great Prithvi Raj Chauhan did actually kill Ghori at Ghori's very home , surrounded by his own people. We dont get to know this from official history books because-

1.Muslim history writers portrayed this other way because the truth was very insulting for their " victorious sultan".

2. Most of the now read Indian history was written during British rule under their guidance who had no intention of honouring our brave past...rather the opposite- they tried to portray it in a way that decreased the confidence of Bhartiyas..

3. So they dismiss the Prithviraj Raso- our side of documentation of events as fable and accept muslim side of story.

4. Contrary to Greek historians [https://www.quora.com/Was-Indian-King-Porus-defeated-by...] and Muslim historians our royal historians never lied about actually what happened in order to please the throne.

5.Because for other great Kings eg Maharana Pratap we never hear any such things ..They accept whatever truly happened..that he died alone in jungles sticking to his vow of not living a life of comforts till he frees his kingdom....this is the rajput side of story too...its not like on the rajput side they write " and the brave Maharana killed Akbar and so n so.." 

6.For Rajputs the death at the hand of enemy fighting bravely till last strength has been a matter of pride..[ its taught to them since time ancient- its written in Bhagvad geeta as Kshatriya who dies fighting for his Praja goes to heaven after death} They embrace the defeat bravely too...unlike Greek and Muslim historian they dont find it shameful to accept the defeat of their king as whatever happened was fate, their king did his "Karma" bravely.

7. So its not possible that Chandrabardai would write a lie about his respected king in his Prithviraj Raso as it would be dishonouring to the King's brave efforts...the Rajputs of that time would not have liked it if it was a lie.

What a shame...PrithviRaj Maharaj died knowing that his last feat of Bravey will inspire his following generations forever to never loose courage even in enemy's captivity....He did not know that such a Gigantic truth will be deliberately hidden by dirty politics.

This incident of Ghori killed by Prithviraj Chauhan, blind and captive ,at his mercy is as equally awe inspiring as the other great incidents of our history 
like-
Breaking of Shiv Dhanush by shri Ram, 
Winning of Draupadi Swayamwar by Arjuna,
Victory of Vikramaditya over Shakas,
Slaying of Afzal by Shivaji Maharaj, 
King Porus defeating the ever victorious Alexander the "not so great",
Chandrashekar Azad killing many before being captured,,,
and on and on and on......

The similarities in above? Modern historians call them all Imaginations of an overtly patriotic mind because our side is the" lying side", whatever Ghori's and Alexander's historians wrote is alone truth beacuse you can see how moral , kind , honest and truthful these great Kings { ghori and alexander} were.....

For those who didnt get the sarcasm-
Uncivilized barbarians they were actually who massacred town and villages killing people not sparing women and babies,,burning the lands to the ground...turning furtile lands into barren...and destroying historical monuments { eg 400 foot tower built by Kushan king Kanishka in Afganistan in 130 CE}, universities like Nalanda , burning biggest collections of scientific and literary works which were achieved by humanity's great efforts though millennia .
  Was Indian King Porus defeated by Alexander? Answer (1 of 13): No. Porus was not defeated There is no second thought - Alexander was a great commander. In his late 20's Alexander got a… QUORA.COM  

My afghan friends also know the story of prithviraj chauhan killing ghori and they accept that is the reason his body is buried in afghanistan at a remote village where prithviraj chauhan's grave was stepped on by muslims...
 
sher singh rana went to afghanistan and video taped his act of repatriating chauhans ashes back to india.