Jump to content

GanM

Members
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GanM

  1. I'm starting to have trouble understanding you. No offense, but your grammar and spelling are atrocious. Oh well. At least it proves that you're not a POOFTA.

    I thought of this topic not because of Rakash only, but because I'm concerned that people are losing their basic humanity, in spite of their home-made religions and self-serving doctrines (which basically tell them "do as your fathers did"). Basically, a child can be born in Canada in, say, 1986, and depending on who their parents' ancestors were they end up hating their Muslim or Sikh or Jewish or Hindu neighbours, and keeping centuries-old feuds alive in the name of tradition.

    They forget that for all of them, their happiest times were when they felt most safe. Therefore they start threatening each other and building/keeping weapons. Everyone starts to feel unsafe, then the learned mechanisms for perpetuating the enmity (say, for instance, the old folks' way of using a harvesting tool to disembowel the foreigner) come back with a vengeance.

    Carrying a weapon (and a basic knowledge of how to use it) means you have the power of life and death over someone else (unarmed) within range of your weapon.

    All I'm saying is:

    YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT.

    If you do, then your neighbour will try to neutralise your weapon with a weapon of his own. This will escalate the situation and create a relationship of mistrust.

    It takes an incredibly brave person to trust a stranger who can kill them in an instant. You can count on that bravery from someone like me (and write it off as lunacy), but not from most other people these days. You're asking for fearlessness, from Joe Public who is terrified of anyone with a kukhri in their belt. It's not realistic. That's the problem with your old-school maryada. The weapons.

    Drop your "tools" and start talking to the people who hate you as well as the people who depend on you (there is a difference between love and dependence).

  2. I have decided to write this message for the nihangs and nihang shagirds. Don't say I never told you.

    I wish to appeal to you guys to stop thinking in terms of violence. It's great that you're upholding Sikh traditions, for the sake of history and so these things are never forgotten. But please stop the weapons hankering.

    Weapons are really ugly, horrible things. Look at a tegha. Imagine what that could do to you or a loved one. Imagine the horrific wounds that can be inflicted by tiger claws and other such things. Please don't bring back the 17th century. Leave the weapons at home, or better yet, in the museum for all to admire them. These are gruesome vicious things that belong in the past. Those things were extremely effective at what they did. They even hurt the psyche of the Sikh people, which resonates down to today and which was not helped by 1984 and subsequent events. Weapons are a FALSE god. They only ever served man and his political ambitions.

    Weapons bring bad things about. Don't carry blades and stuff around with you. If you're being threatened or something, let someone responsible know. Or else you can post the problem here on SikhAwareness, and listen to some suggestions to resolve matters peacefully. I promise to try to help resolve such problems by offering peaceable and lawful solutions.

    I SAY, from this corner of the networks, NO MORE FIGHTING.

    EVERYONE (Sikhs and everyone else) stop fighting.

    NO MORE WAR.

  3. No way. I'm not calling anyone any names. I do believe that Bhindranwale unwittingly did too much harm though. Cossacks have'nt been tolerated in Punjab since Partition. He unwittingly or wittingly modelled himself as some sort of Punjabi Cossack (much as many of you guys fancy yourselves), and reaped the rewards of that approach. He was a Jatt supremacist (i.e. a sort of gypsy headman/chieftain) and not a religious leader at all. Having said that, his intentions were probably good (although in the context, they were absolutely irrelevant).

    I just meant that playing with fanaticism is an unsound military/political strategy, because the martyrs you create are dangerous to everyone until they are dead. They cannot be used as bargaining chips.

    There is one humanity. If you spread the doctrine of death, it's the same as if you were trying to give everyone cancer. OTOH, at the barbecue everyone has a full belly and a sense of well-being. A Sant ought to know that and take advantage of it, to everyone's benefit.

    You don't need any lessons to learn the "vidya" of Aryan supremacy. Some people have been playing that game for a very long time.

  4. wow, thats a heated article..... these people have to much time on there hands... I read the first 2 lines and straight thought this guys bored....

    B for Bin Laden and B for Bhindrwale... when his name is actually Osama Bin Landen and Bhindrawale is a name of pind, as his actual name was Jarnail!!!

    Ohh my god :oops:

    Yeah, maybe he was bored. So what?

    Read the LAST 2 LINES carefully.

×
×
  • Create New...