Jump to content

Arsh1469

Members
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Arsh1469

  1. 9 hours ago, Trimandeep Singh said:

    Most probably, he would have said that like the Nirankari, Baba Banda Singh Ji too did some deeds like this but this doesn't mean that he remained like that till his last breath. And I request you to give him some respect, please! 

    1. He was chosen by Dashmesh Pita to lead the panth.

    2. After Khalsa Raj came, he didn't become a political leader or a king but went to the hills to do bhagti. He had absolutely no attachments.

    3. If Baba ji would have done something like that, how can he give a shahaadat like that? You do know that his son's heart was put into his mouth. This torture was out of this world. If he was a patit/tankhaiya, how can he give a Mahaan shahaadat like this?!

    Stop falling to social media propaganda.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Trimandeep Singh 

    I wasn't disrespecting him or denying that he was a shaheed. I am not falling to propaganda. What I am trying to say and what Sant ji says is Banda Singh is not perfect. Banda Singh made people worship him.

     To address your points. 1 Yes but that doesn't mean he was unable to make mistakes. 2 Is there any evidence he did this? Did any Sant say this? 3 Just because he wasn't perfect doesn't mean he wouldn't be able to give shaheedi.

    Here is some evidence of Banda Singh's flaws

    In Gurbilas Patshahi 10 Bhai Koer Singh says he fell to his ego.

    In Sketch of the Sikhs he is said to have changed the fateh. Make the Sikhs leave eating of flesh and create his own rehat. He also made Sikhs not wear blue.

    In Mahan Kosh it is said he became arrogant and preached his own rehat.

    Giani Gian Singh says Banda Singh tried to make himself a Guru.

    Many Nihangs believe he created his own Sikh path.

    Sant Jarnail Singh Ji says that Banda Singh was like a fake Nirankari Guru.

    This next point has evidence both with and against it so draw your own conclusion based on the facts. Banda Singh killed innocent civilians.

    There arw many more sources but these are the main ones.

     From all this evidence you can draw on to your own conclusion. But we know for a fact that Banda Singh(We don't even know if he took amrit) was a great conqueror. He did eventually fall to ego. He created his own path and proclaimed himself Guru. At the end it is said that he accepts the torture because he knew this is happening because of his actions. 

    So IMHO Banda Singh is not a Sant/Mahapurukh. I feel a close comparison with him would be Muhammad who to was good at the start a great conqueror. He too fell to ego and made people worship him. Banda Singh didn't necessarily do the same but he did proclaim himslef Guru. Mohammed definitely killed innocents but for Banda Singh it is disputed. They too both created there on path. Mohammed created a path where he was supreme not God. Banda Singh created a path which split the Sikh for centuries and made himself supreme. I am unsure if Mohammad asks for forgiveness from the Lord for his actions but I know Banda Singh did. Banda Singh also made himself a shaheed to inspire future generations.

    Forgive me for any mistakes.

  2. 8 hours ago, Trimandeep Singh said:

    Brahmgyani Baba Banda Singh Bahadur changed the Fateh but was later punished my sangat. This is what I have heard. Not going into details. 

    Trimandeep Singh 

    Here is katha of Sant Ji comparing him too Nirankari. Listen past 10 min https://gurmatveechar.com/audios/Katha/01_Puratan_Katha/Sant_Jarnail_Singh_(Bhindran_wale)/41_Questions_with_Sant_Jarnail_Singh_Ji_Bhindrawalae/Sant.Jarnail.Singh.(Bhindra.wale)--41.Questions.with.Sant.Jarnail.Singh.Ji.Bhindrawalae.Part.01.mp3

  3. On 4/19/2011 at 11:03 AM, Silence said:

    A fakir/ a sadhu used to sent letters to mohammad. This letters were collected from different parts like mecca, medina and other villages.

     

    When people used to ask where this letter came from, mohammad used to say from God.

     

    When this letters were completed ,the fakir/sadhu informed mohammad that he wanted to visit him.

     

    Mohammad told his followers that a shaitan (satan) will be visiting and would be claming that the letters are from him. AND TO KILL HIM.

     

    So Mohammad basically got this sadhu murdered to claim himself as the real sadhu/prophet. "

    Wasn't Muhammad illiterate?

  4. I have heard lots of people on this form say this is true because this mahpurkh said so but lots of times different mahapurukhs from different Sampardamas contradict each other. I personally believe all mahapurukhs are human and are not always correct. Also how do we know someone is a mahapurukh?

    Edit: Not trying to say mahapurukhs are bad.

  5. 5 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

    One  Rome was never supposed to have a caeser. Death to tyrants. 

    Two, he was a horrible person. 

    Three, nobody liked him. 

    There are dudes in prison more sophisticated than these leaders of "western culture ".

    One Caesar was actually popular mainly because he did reforms to help the poor which the senate didn't do. Two the Senate made him a tyrant they voted to make him dictator for more time and gave him all the powers. 

    Was he a horrible person yes I suppose through the eyes of modern morales but the past was a different world. He was bad but not nearly as bad as other leaders. 

  6. On 1/18/2021 at 2:37 PM, singh1981 said:

    VERY NICE POSTS. Bro, I have a few questions

    1) All the Sants / Mahapurkhs were Sannyasis --- can we householders become brahm gyani, if the answer is Yes -- then please show me some examples. Don't give example from puritan times. I want examples from Modern times.

    2) Is it possible to attain brahmgyan stage while living in foreign lands such as Canada, Amerika atey UK. Reason I ask is because here dollar and pound is the King and life is extremely worldly, materialistic. Worldly duties get to a very high avastha here, where as in India you can have constant daishan, visits to Gurudwaras and other pavitar asthaans. 

    3) Maharaaj Dhan Dhan Baba Nand Singh ji has left physical abode, can we still have his darshan, can he still listen to our prayers?

    1 To the first one yes as I know Samt Jarnail Singh was married and has kids.

    2 Yes 

    And 3 yes

     

  7. On 2/1/2021 at 2:42 PM, SunnySingh said:

    If Guru Gobind Singh said what you say, that is fine, because He is th form of Waheguru Akal Purukh at our level, which means He is omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent.  

    Whatever He says is the Truth.

    But let us ask ourselves? Even if all the names of those jeevas mentioned by you in your post above is a reality, what is so great about it? 

    We must bear in mind, merging and becoming one with Waheguru is not like going to a holiday resort or to a foreign land for sometime and coming back.

    For any soul who reaches Waheguru´s level and merges in Him, has for sure lost his petty identity and become one with Him without any distinction.

    And if these jeevas mentioned by you,  they came back,  that means they were not one with Him, they were somewhere settling their karmas ... thus they came back once again as human biengs to perfect their bhakti and if it is His mauj, then go and become one with Him, that is it.

    We too, each one of us, have been born countless times, in countless lives and species, so then?  

    Our only goal to be paid attention to, should be the goal taught in the Gurbani, which is Guru Jee or Satnam, that is it, for only with Him can we ever get out from maya and brahm..

    Who comes, who goes, where does that jeeva go .... are all distractions.

    Life is too short, we should focus on ourselves, whether we are fulfilling our purpose of doing the right job/bhakti to get out of the endless cycle of 84, for once and ever and merge in  Him, with His grace, that is it.

     

    They came back as they were sent by Vahguru.

     

×
×
  • Create New...