chatanga

ant - ant

in - in

ang - part of body, ny thinking is his kashera.

thats it !!!he got ants in his pants!

you're welcome.

why if you have the attitude towards other faiths would you want her to convert? If she was happy in sikhi, which most likely she deosnt really know much about, would you want to say to her if you choose me you choose islam?

also what if you studied Gurbani thorugh study and not thru force?

I cant speak for all Sikhs , but myself i dont really have an issue with islam or muslims. The only time i get riled is when muslims ( or anyoen for that matter) deliberately distort sikhi to undermine it.

Why have you let this hang for 7 yeras as well? Thassa long time dude!!

theres a lot more awareness od DGG bcuz in the last few years we have seen the anti DGG people make a huge effort to put thier point across starting with kala afgahna and so on and so on. The difference wiv these nindaks however is that they openly challenged Akal Takht authourity and seem to have come out of it unscathed, so more cockroached have now come out such as ghagga who had 400 questions about Sant Gurbachan Singh.

ok , we understood the querstion the first time!!!

the taksal do not make nindia of past avtara. they juss tell of what Guru Maharaj has stated.

yeah when me fistr read that book me thought its duz make SOME sense. but how do you explain 7 peaks in the womb? or 7 ice-capped mountains in the womb?

Listen to katha of Bachitar Natak by taksal and you will learn a lot.

Neo , me is waitning for an answer to my earlier question.

that article was writte by dalip singh from usa. he has written a few books in the same as ghaggas and kala afghanis.

and that dalip singh is so far up his own ass , he can taste his tonsils.

its not the same ramanad for a start. the ramanand of kaljug was not the same one that Guru Ji is refering to.

you dont think he may be joking at all? i find it funny.

Neo, we have every right to respond to pepole caliming lineage from Guru. DO you believe this when it comes to Namdharis Gurus?

what good would shooting him do anyway? he hasnt done anything against sikhi either. another DAS would just step into his shoes befoer the body even got cold.

yeh me has no problem wiv that. however what gets me is that some people know how to take advantage of uneducated people, or even superstitioous people.

your stomach is a graveyard if you drink water as well.

i agree wiv that, i think as a pracharak he is ok. the thing wid darshan das was that when he came to uk in 87, the indian govt issued a statemnet to he BBC that the " guru of the sikhs will be visiting uk". given what hapned over the nirankaris in 78 etc govt support of non-sikh movements, 2 sikhs here shot him in southall. i have heard tape of him being shot.

jus b4 he is shot a woman in the gathering is asking him whether its ok to vidit india according to the stars cosmosiclagy or summat.

anyway i cant say for sure that he promoted hisself as guru of sikhs anywhere, but certainly niether him or his followers did anyting about him being the guru of the sikhs statement.

i have heard that he had women sucking his toe, and that is not an euphimism for anything.

anyhow i wouldnt really make a point of listening to him.

he was notihng to do wiv sikhi. he juss quoted gurbani as an where it suited him.

duznt balbir singh also have backing of sgpc?

lohri in sikhi isnt celebratedas aprt of sikhi. its just celebrated by sikhs as a festival. same as christmas. we had a lovley tree. i spent long time looking at it. but i wouldnt go sofar as to say that the birth of Father X-mas is celebrated by SIkhs.

wot duz tapoban mean? i have also seen it at Dhakki Sahib in Ludhiana.

yeh me read that. what do you make of it MDS?

i remember asking my vidya guru " there are so many texts and knowledge within sikhi that most people could never get round to reading or listening to them all."

he replied " in your lifetime, read Aad Guru Dasam Guru and anything else will be a bonus."

now i have have made a little atempt to read them. still at the start mind you, but the list given above could only be completed by someone who has time on their hands. I dont think that in my lifetime i would probably get round to reading many or any of the above texts.

is it practical tho to expect a perosn to have read all of the baove texts?

i hope to see responses from tony, tsingh, niranjana, neo singh and shaheediyan .

thanks for putting my name in. wot ju fink? i dont no nuffin?

tsingh, couldnt the majority of Virakt udasis, have protested the activities of the minority, or even better have them removed from the privileged positions they held, for the sake of the Udasi panth, as they were defaming the panth adn udasi image?

tsingh, do you not think that the udasis compromised thier own traditions in the first place by introducing activities which have no place in sikhi? ie drinking and prostituion ?