Kharag Singh

youve gone off somewhere else now. reread my posts then reply please

yes if they were in the same plane, but Granth Maharaj and the ginans are in two different "mediums" thats like correlating the Buddhist Sutras and the Zoroaster books of fire

no problem jehre marji din aajavi yeh but how can you drag Sarbloh Guru Granth Sahib Ji into it. The ginans and Granth maharaj are two different and separate sources you cant correlate both to prove your point

you haven't answered my question, but has stalled them which i have noticed you have a tendency to do so

Kalki Avtaar will come, untill the end of time Mahavishnu has to uphold his duty!

dasam bani is not full of quotes of the Quran nor the puraans, they are Maharajs own compositions, and are you then calling my kalanidhaan guru a copy cat? also did lady fatimah destroy chand and mund if not then she has no status to that of chandika. Is she reffered to as the "dhulfikar" or any weapon in the ginans? Admin Cut: No Personal Attacks Allowed !

ur forgetting one more mahapursh Mahakaal Akali Nihung 96 Cror Budha Dal Panth Jathedaar Shrimaan Sant Bhramgyani Baba Santa Singh JI

he adorns the aad chand but does he know what it means??? and whats with the chumta waving???

khao peevo aish karro mitro dill par kisse da dukhayo na!!!!

maharaj dasme patshah, glorifies chandi which in accordance to islam would be considered heracy. So if Pehli Patshah is a muslim, then surly so is Guru Gobind Singh Ji since he is considered the 10th Nanak. Also dasme pathshah clearly states raam RAHEEM puraan QURAN anke kahe mat ek na manyo. Quite clearly it seems evident that maharaj has denounced rahim and his kataib as he has ordered the panth to ignore such books and religious leaders. So if you say that dasme patshah the 10th Nanak is shia then isnt Maharaj contradicting himself and portraying him self as (lord forgive me) a blasphemer?