cul

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6926180.ece

what the actual shit

from that picture it looks like he's wrapped his wife's chuni around his head...not even tucked in at the back

http://www.cracked.com/blog/the-8-manliest-images-on-the-internet/

guess who's no/ 1 haha

I'm sure as hell not Indian, dunno about you, just 'cuz half of the Punjab is in India now doesn't make you Indian or of Indian origin. We had our own kingdom, remember? Again, he can deny whatever the hell he wants doesn't make him a bigot, it just makes him stupid, almost as stupid as dalsingh here. BTW he doesn't deny the famine, he denies that it was orchestrated, which is a fair argument.

My argument is semantic, dalsingh, but you're too stupid to see that. This thread is about 'bigots' and what to do about them, all we have here is an idiot that is ill informed - that does not make him a bigot. Typical minority knee jerk OMFG HE'S A RACIST reaction that only results in the loss of respect to any point we try to make publicly.

Of the issue of colonialism - British rule would be a hell of a lot preferable to either Nazi or Soviet rule. Post colonialism, what have the Indians done for the Sikhs other than oppress them?

I don't see either of you complaining about Indian bigotry or abuse towards the Sikhs, the thing I hate most about people is their willingness to subscribe to revisionism or blind subscription to one view.

You don't know what 'discussion' is, dalsingh, seeing as you expect everyone to sit on the same side of the fence. But of course it's ok for you to make baseless claims about people over the internet, right?

Yes, the good ol' empire days, the good ol' Sikh empire days, you retarded baboon.

I don't see any bigotry on his part. None of his opinions are racially biased, on the first page at least.

It's PC nowadays to blindly accept certain interpretations of history, one of them being that imperialism or colonialism was inherently evil, which is overly simlpistic. He is simply adding a balancing argument using his own, contrary opinions - this doesn't make him a bigot.

I'd prefer it orange, but I agree with getting rid of the green.

If she wants a human teacher explain to her about the existence of Mahapursh.

Naam destroys it.

It's bloody ugly, for one.

He told you this is an open forum for any opinion so untwist your panties, sit down and stop hyperventilating.

??? SCHOLARS like SINGH2? yeah from the University of GOOGLE.

n30 im seriously doubting your intelligence friend. these so called fanatics you talk about describe singh2 etc perfectly. you only have to look at their last couple of responses.

Singh2 i havent even heard of Sumer Singh, because i dont read bullshit written by others I only read the Original. And 'accept' the language in it. If you people want to run to others because you get scared when Guru uses -'GASP!'- a 'Hindu' word and you need some made up explanation or excuse for it thats your choice. but in the process you have become the chela of that 'scholar'.

it is filth like you who are 'anti-panthic'.

now your last hope is come out screaming 'oh he is RSS' so no one reads my stuff. oh well. im not on some 'heoric crusader' trip, you can delete my posts and ban me if you want i honestly dont give a shit.

What the hell made you say:

QUOTE

It wasn't the UK government that shipped it over, it was a private company which is being investigated by the UK.

Wow you sure have a knack for accidentally-on-purpose quoting out of context don't you. That comment was not directed at you.

Really? And other than your wild imagination where is your source for the idea that the govt was involved in this?

I'm not defending anything other than the cause against stupidity. It's illegal to export non recyclable waste - who do you think made those laws? You really think the govt is sitting around sniggering about how theyre going to send TWO WHOLE containers of trash to Brazil?

BTW Bush and Blair aren't in power any more, in case you hadn't noticed. BTW pt deux, It's not my govt, congratulations on making even more retarded assumptions.

I should've known better than to expect anything but redundant dogma from here.

np

pat pat

The difference between sex motivated by love and that by lust is intention. Only you can answer for yourself your motives.

I apologise for any offience and my tone, however the article is selectively quoted out of context so no, not a knee jerk reaction =p.

Maybe don't quote it all? or mention what it's about...

BTW Mithar, Brazil and India are hardly poor as developing states go.

bullshit

It wasn't the UK government that shipped it over, it was a private company which is being investigated by the UK.

If you have nothing better to offer than a retarded, ignorant knee-jerk response without even the decency to read the flipping article then stfu.

Same goes for you dalsingh, conveniently quoting the article out of context, good going.

Totally off topic, but how do you find it being a Sikh in Denmark? In terms of local acceptance? What happened with the Gurdwaras?

You can PM me if you don't want to go OT on this thread.

These people are the modern equivalent of Peter.

They bow to the Guru. They make grand claims of how Sikhism is the most modern religion, the first without caste, the first with gender equality, the only with respect for other ways of life. They make all these boasts about Sikhism is an eveolutionary step forward, yet when the same Guru that revealed the path to us says not to cut our hair they say it is devolution. Why? Because they have no cojones. They like to make the grand claims about their great heritage (usually down the pub), but if the time ever came to stand up for what they apparently believe they would step back. If we were ever hunted as Jesus was, they would deny their relation to us to save their own skins.

There's a Greek saying, "the best sailors are always in the dock"/

The Guru says pleasure and pain are the same, unless the dude accepts the 'pain' first he will never understand it.

Someone that did little paat has been inspired to do undertake an intense increase in their bhagti and you, idiot that you are, find cause to complain about the number.

Until you have the understanding and natural dedication to bhagti working with set goals is a great way to push yourself, just like with any endeavour.

Tell him to resign him/herslef to it. Embrace it.

Tera kia meeta lagai etc

So you're saying that because we do one thing badly we should do everything else badly too?

GENIUS

Speaking of the usual mediocrity with which Sikhs do everything M Duleep Singh did not die in Paris because of 'refusing to step on British soil again' but because none of his grovveling was enough to get Queen Victoria to forgive him for trying to get the Russians to invade the Punjab.

Of course, it sounds better their way, and who the hell will notice right? Damn revisionists.

someone who has one sikh parent, but the other one isnt.

point is, the concept of a 'half sikh' is retarded

there is no such thing, you either are or you're not, it's not something genetic that is passed on in part from parent to child

Quote "Sikhs attach with Guru Naanak ( Nirankar and Guru Nanak are the same)"

Nirankaar took birth as Guru Naanak. Is it right?

yes

Quote " . . . and naturally show devotion even for his sandals out of immense love."

Why only sandals, where are other things from Him?

Who said only sandals?

Quote "I fail to understand your question of promotion ...?"

I try it again. Should more Sikhs get training to worship sandals followed by devotion and love?

No one is worshipping sandals, the point everyone is trying to make is that these specific sandals that you brought up are poojneek because they belonged to Guru Sahib.

Quote "If I loved someone I would not only worship my loved one but also hold the object that reminds me of my loved on in high regard."

I am not sure if it is always true. The other day a friend was complaining. He loves his wife. But he does not love her when she comes on bed wearing sandals. Loving two at the same time is not possible.

It's not about the bloody sandals, and even if wearing sandals in bed annoyed him this doesn't imply a lack of love. If she were dead, her sandals would remind him of her i.e. they will start simran of her in his mind - being reminded of Guru Sahib by his sandals is also simran, this is what makes them poojneek.

Nothing beats fresh sliced potato fries...

wth is a half sikh

I don't see a problem as long as it only applies to Muslims who choose to use them. They are just for arbitration of non-criminal matters e.g. if a couple want to settle their divorce via sharia or land disputes etc.

If they ever try to set up courts to deal with criminal matters, then there will be problems. Crime will probably fall though, lol.

So after all the trouble we have gone to promote gender equality you think it's ok for a subset of society to continue to oppress their women in peace?

If these idiots want sharia they should go live in a sharia country.