Del Piero

I doubt it has anything to do with genetics, if they spent some money on sports facilities and institution etc... Then it would do well, it’s all about training.

That’s because anything to do with India is RSS and Anti Panthic

I don’t like cricket probably because i used to get forced to play it lol

But for a country with such a huge population it is pathetic that they can’t make stars in sports other than cricket. I mean the Olympic team never had any uniform and people had to fund raise to get it them It’s a damn shame they don’t receive support from its country.

Do any of the forum members watch or have any interest any sports here? If so which ones?

I love this kam i think it will aid alot of people out there. Maybe once the translations are done you can put them as one big pdf file or something or maybe get them printed as books in stores which would be amazing.

One again thanks Kam

Thank youuu bruvv

Well i read this on Sikhi wiki site http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Sarbloh_Granth

Five points casting doubt on the ascribed authorship of Guru Gobind Singh.

1. The work is marked by extraordinary effusiveness and discursiveness of style, compaired to the compactness, so characteristic of Guru Gobind Singh's compositions collected in the Dasam Granth. Qualitatively, too, the poetry of Sarabloh Granth does not match that of Guru Gobind Singh's Chandi Charttras and Var Durga Ki dealing with the same topic of wars between the gods and the demons. The profusion of metaphor and superb imagery of the latter compositions are missing here.

2. The author of Sarbloh Granth often uses his name, 'Das Gobind' or the phrase 'Das Gobind fatah satgur ki', which is generally contrary to the style of Guru Gobind Singh.

3. The Sarbloh Granth contains, quite out of context, an account of the Sikh religion, which also includes a reference to the devolution of guruship on Guru Granth Sahib and Guru Panth (stanzas 3159-66). This would be out of place in a work of Guru Gobind Singh's own composition.

4. There is also a reference in it to Rup Dip Bhasha Pingal (stanza 2938/ 8), a work on prosody written by one Jaya Krishna in 1719, i.e. eleven years after the death of the Guru.

5. It uses dass Gobind or Fateh Gobind yet mentions Guru Granth Sahib being Guru. This means it is written after Guru Granth Sahib received Gurgaddi

if Guru wrote it then it wouldn't be dass gobind but Gobind Singh. that is if Guru was going to use his own name. But Guru Ji used Nanak as all Gurus had Guru Nanak's jot. So why would Guru Gobind SIngh Ji use something else? If 5th Nanak doesn't have permission to change 1 word from Guru Granth Sahib Ji, then how did 10th Guru get permission to change Nanak to Gobind?

Anyone want to clear any of the points up for me?

HAHA Neo, im guessing you've never been under the knife before have you? Having tonsils out is really a minor thing, as for someone whos had many operations i would say, its always best to be positive. Or you could take the negative approach and act really ill, maybe you'll get a few extra days off work, and some sympathy lol

trust me tonsils are a walk in the park

Troll

"A Sikh 4 Life" do you have problem with all of Dasam Granth? or just a certain part?

This Picture i think is of all 3 Granths parkashed

I dont know why it bugs you so much that people have faith in Dasam Granth. Your long posts are not going to change anyones views, and the long posts that are written in reply to you are not going to change yours, so i see this whole "debate" as a waste of time.