Jump to content

Hari

Members
  • Posts

    606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hari

  1. As far as I know, the original Sai Baba is said to have been the reincarnation of Bhagat Kabir Ji.The current Sai Baba is a fake and a con-artist.He's a con-artist magician like David Blaine, Paul Daniels et al.I don't know about the sexual abuse...but I wouldn't be surprised.

    The amount of fake Sadhu/Sant around these days, it looks like Narak may become filled to capacity :evil: :twisted:

  2. i heard that they use cannabis as prashaad, is this a good or bad thing may i have your opinions?

    I was 5 years old when I first drank Sukha Degh.It's been a few years since I last drank some.It's so tasty :D

    Nihang Singhs certainly know how to make nice sukha Degh and bhang vale pakore :wink:

    Oh, and Mahaparshaad :wink:

    Cannibis was used by Nihang Singhs as a pain supressant in battle, so they could battle for longer in extreme pain from cuts and blows :evil: :evil: :evil:

    Nihang Singh = vanguard of Khalsa Fauj of Satguru Gobind Singh, I would say.I may be wrong.Correct me if I am.

  3. Gurfateh!

    www.gobindsadan.org>>>>>many people have expressed various views about this website....

    What do you think????

    Personally I thank God that someone has endeavoured to bring Dasam Guru Darbar to the masses...

    God bless Baba Virsa Singh ( i'm not advocating any jatha...jus thanking someone for shedding like on the Dasam Guru Darbar)

    SIRI AKAAAL JI SAHAI!!! :D

    It's too bad their rendition of Dasam Granth has got spelling/printing mistakes.Just take a look at their Jaap Sahib. :roll:

  4. In Gurbani Gurmantar is spelled:

    vava-kanna-haha-sihari-gagga-aunkar-gagga-dulaunkar

    That's why I always use Vahiguru (v-A-h-i-g-u-r-U), it is best transliteration of Gurmantar.

    I pronounce Gurmantar as Vaa-hi-guroo.There is no "w" in Gurmukhi, but in some instances vava is meant as "w," especially Persian/Arabic loan words, like awwal (spelt aval), as in Awwal Allah Nur Upaya.

    As far as I know, in Sanskrit, there is no "w" letter nor "w" sound.

  5. With regards to accusations of "slander", what has been presented is Facts about Randhir Singh and Fauja Singh. Slander is character assasination based on lies and untruths. No where on the websites have we questioned the characters of Randhir Singh or Fauja Singh or their relationship with the Almighty, this is not our place to do so.

    As yet NO one has come to us and proved with solid evidence that we are incorrect with what we have said with regards to Fauja Singh or Randhir Singh...not even the Akhand Kirtani Jatha who are the only group that is opposing the website and has attempted to take many steps to prevent this knowledge from being revealed.

    In fact, what we have seen from the AKJ (from the likes of Jagjit Singh from Leeds, and other individuals) is slander, ie, pure lies.

    The websites will be continued to be updated, and this information will be released in ever larger amounts.

    PS....we have yet to hear from Uptej (Teji) Singh and other Gatka masters out there with regards to the Hadh Torh Challenge, that remains unanswered.

    Most intriguing, especially:

    PS....we have yet to hear from Uptej (Teji) Singh and other Gatka masters out there with regards to the Hadh Torh Challenge, that remains unanswered.
  6. In response to your post, are you saying that Guru Gobind Singh Ji were not a Guru in their previous life and practised austerities with the aim of attaining salvation?

    Yes.Just like you weren't Gurpreet Kaur in your previous existence.He was not Satguru Gobind Singh, in his previous life, just like Satguru Nanak.Let me give you example of Satguru Nanak, from Onkaar:

    Ghar Dar Phir Thaaki Bahutere.

    To many houses and doorsteps have I wandered and grown tired.(Satguru Nanak isn't alluding to His Udasi's, but the many wanderings of His soul, before His mukati, just like us)

    Jaat Asankh Ant Nahi Mere.

    My births have been countless, there has been no end to my incarnations.

    Kete Maat Pita Sut Dhee-aa.

    Many have been my mothers, fathers, sons and daughters.

    Kete Gur Chele Phun Hoo-aa.

    Many have been my Guru's and disciples.

    Kaache Gur Te Mukat Na Hoo-aa.

    A false Guru does not grant liberation. (Dakhni Onkaar, Satguru Nanak, p.929 - 938)

    So it is obvious from the above that Satguru Nanak had many previous lives.He had many Guru's and indeed was also a Guru/Acharya(?) Himself, in His previous existences.

    Satguru Nanak went through the same process as we are going through aswell. :cry:

  7. I think I'll give a better reply than before, for the sake of HeyDudeWhatsUp et al.

    Athiests, people who believe in after-life but not in their Creator (nigure), people who are ignorant of their self (those without bibek-buddhi), those who are still attched to their miserable lives (people with regrets etc), those who die in mental darkness; these are the kinds of people who become ghosts and ghouls etc.

    Basically, those who are nigure (without Guru) are more liable to becoming roaming ghosts, not knowing where to go or what to do.They are condemned by their own thought processes.

    So this means, that a Sikh of Satguru Nanak Dev does not become a ghost.Satisfied?

  8. In response to Bikramjit singh's post:

    I think you are reading too much into my reply.I refer you to jjj's post above, his is a better answer than mine.Tapasya (austerities) can be committed in the rememberance of Vahiguru.Tapasya for the sake of Tapasya or occult powers is futile...

    You know Ardaas right?In Ardaas, you come across:

    Panjan Pyaarian, Chauhan Sahibzaadian, Chalyaan Muktian, Hathian, Japian, Tapian, Jinaa Naam Japia...

    Can you tell me what your view is of Tapian in Ardaas?I'd like to know your view, as I am not certain to what it means.Perhaps you know? :stupid:

  9. Interesting you quote the Oxford dictionary because the love/desire vs. lust division is a Victorian inovation.

    India does not know this division until the British come! :wink:

    Yes, agreed.However language does change and evolve.There are many English swear words in use today which were considered normal in past history.

    Maybe lust only meant sexual desire at one stage.Now though it has dual meaning, just like many other words.

  10. LUST and DESIRE are two different things my dear Amans!!! 8)

    Lust = sexual desire or strong passionate desire/want :roll:

    lust . n. 1 strong sexual desire. 2 a passionate desire for something. . v feel lust for someone or something.

    - ORIGIN Old English

    Above from Oxford English dictionary.Lalleshvari :roll: :roll: :roll:

    You can desire for or lust for anything. :D

    Words do have similar meanings you know.Depends on context.Lust doesn't necessarily mean sexual desire, it can also mean to have passionate all-consuming desire for something.

    Lust for life, lust for car, lust for money.Give me-give me-give me...I want-I want-I want...must have-must have-must have... :cry: :cry: :cry:

    I mean the Indian god of love/sexual desire is called Kaam-Dev, just Eros god of love.

    Primary meaning of Kaam is desire/wish.But desire comes in many forms, and one of them is sexual desire.

  11. Umm, How could Guru Ji have done 'hard penance' when Guru Nanak Dev Ji condemned that practise and other austerities as futile?

    :shock: Just wondered, it's been bugging me for a while :?

    Satguru Gobind Singh Ji wasn't Guru Gobind Singh in His previous existence was he?He was someone else, yet still the same.Just like you and I were someone or something else in our previous existence, yet still the same.Understand?

    You need to look at Gurbani more.In Guru Granth Sahib the Satguru and Bhagats have written about their previous births.Read Onkaar (Dakhni Onkaar) by Satguru Nanak, He talks about how He wasted many lives with false (kacche) Guru etc.

    Don't assume things without reading up on Gurbani properly.

  12. Ok then well we have this problem of ants in our house. They are allover the place. Especially in our kitchen. Its like even if our kitchen is spotless clean, they'll be moving on our kitchen, the plates, the cups, the spoons and man everywhere. So you guys can imagine what to expect if there is any speck of food left around :!:

    So would it wrong if i kill them???? cuz i can pick up 1 or 2 ants ok maybe 3 the most, and take em outside, but man more than that, ill go mad! So should i kill em or wait till they go away (which is IMPOSSIBLE!), or wait for my mum, sister or dad to get home so that they can kill em and jst say to them that i neva went to the kitchen?????

    :? :( i dont know what to do, if i try killn em, i think Gods in em... :!: :cry: my sis is alwayz pickn on me sayn that ure a weirdo cuz i dont wana kill them... :x

    The reason why ants have invade your house might be because there's little for them in your garden to eat or they've had a population explosion.

    You could try putting food out fro them in your garden (stale roti/sabzi/dal etc) instead of throwing food in to the bin.They might just stop bothering you if you do this.They may be attracted towards your bin.

    Do they have set paths in your house.You should try following them to see where they go to in your house.

    Putting food out for them is tried and tested, best to put it near their entrance/exit holes.I do hate the idea of using any kind of insecticide :cry:

    Ants are cool!They clear up rubbish.

  13. I have seen many (around 10+) young marriages end in failure.You have to be mature and financially secure to get married.

    I think it's best for the married couple to live away from parents and grandparents and other family unless you want mega-stress all the time.

    I speak from experience :roll:

  14. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa

    Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

    I think you need to look at the evidence contained in Sukhmani Sahib rather than accept each and every theory that you may come across.

    If Baba Sri Chand contributed 'Aad Sach Jugaad Sach' slok then what was the need for this contribution. It is already contained in Japji and is a part of the revelation of Guru Nanak which was already with Guru Arjan. In Gurbani each and every contributor is carefully acknowleged. The end of pauris in Ashpadi 17 declare the contibutor 'Nanak' for Guru Arjan. Or are we to believe that Guru Arjan would claim a Slok which was 'contributed' by Baba Sri Chand but which was actually a revelation of Guru Nanak already contained in Japji Sahib.

    Seems more like an Udasi attempt to give some role to Baba Sri Chand in the compilation of Gurbani.

    GurFateh

    Bikramjit

    No I don't believe it to be an Udasi attempt to give Baba Sri Chand Ji some kind of role.

    I believe Satguru Arjan Dev wanted the beloved son of Satguru Nanak Dev, to contribute to His grand Sukhmani Sahib.And Baba Sri Chand asked Satguru Arjan Dev to place "Aad Sach.Jugaad Sach.Hai Bhi Sach.Nanak: Hosi Bhi Sach" of his Father - because Baba Sri Chand out of humility and great respect for 1st Nanak and 5th Nanak didn't want to place any of his own Bani.An Amritdhari Gursikh told me this, and I believe it to be true, because this Gursikh is on a very high level, intellectually and spiritually. :bow:

  15. gina - in asian familys theres more to this then just caste... the familys reputation and lineage plays a big part - people first think "what will so and so think"... "how will i show my face is my son marries her".. stuff like that. :?

    This is exactly the kind of Maya-jaal that has to be broken away from.

    Who gives a damn what society thinks?What's society going to do for you?Panjabi are only interested in others nuksaan.

    To hell with backward social codes.I do and say what I mean to, when it is appropiate.

    I fear no rumour mongering...not any more.

×
×
  • Create New...