tejvansh singh

just a one line question

what was the situation for millions of years before guru sahib

that means people lived in darkness

singh khalistan da has saida beautiful picture

we are all dedicated to a certain cause

thanks a lot singh khalistan da

to gursj

dear friend

there is no inequality on this earth

and never view god as a dictatior being unequal with its human beings.

there is no cause and effect relationship in our religion and

nanak jeevatiam maar rahian aaise joog kammayeeya

financial inequality

regional inequlaity

matters a least it is created by human beings on earth.

make sure that operation of god was going on even before gurbani was written

god is basically the nature around us ever equal

it is not a ghost that is wandering around

there are no fixed deeds or curriculum to obtain something

it is the only message to human beings to practice and use nature of god in good way

we are given all the dishes on a table

now we have to choose the quantities so that we should not damage our health

take care

gursj

to gursj

i found you genuine and tolerant to ask me instead of justifying the unknown theories,

i apologise i would be very brief because everything which i am saying is not true and perfect to be said because it is the awakening angle not changing anything in this world

whenever we read poetry we cannot get mathematical expressions through it

like begumpura shehar koo naam

so there is no begumpura it is the beauty of dreamworld and in this world we imagine extreme peace and bliss of god.

in the same way when we look at chaurrasii lakh janam

it is the behavioural world where we behave like animals

chaurrasii lakh is the symbolic expression like chaatii viikaar

so in our random wandering mind we actually are animals and dead bodies

so we find life after death of animal behaviour in this life not something after this life

seeking your response not arguement

i am still not satisfied because some of the persons like nogroup are trying to make me read the holy books.i think he doesnot understand the commonsense question.

some people are trying to convince me that this is the end of human approach towards divinity

can i ask nogroup that there are six thousand languages in the world and you will make me read all the wriiten material in this world to justify your illogical concept of life after death.

folks let me tell you----------------------------if you have read the jaap sahib you will find that it is mentioned there that the glory of god cannot be described in words aleekh hain

also guru nanak ji said -----you yourself knows your glory

then how could any guru describe the life after death.

seeking your kind response

dear gsj

if everything written in guru granth sahib about life is right it is same rightousness that is foind in other religions also

i am talking about illusion of life after death

which one cannot rely blindly upon any religion in the world.

it is illogical to answer like that that we should wait for death

what is your views folks about the dress-code of sewadars in langars in harminder sahib?

whenever you go to langars in harminder sahib you will find very unhygenic condition of sewadars and

there seems to be no ----------instituitional effect to this langar organisation and no regulation of this instuition.

i want your views

thanks

RELIGIONS WHEHTER SIKHISM HINDUISM OR ANY OTHER RELIGION

DELIVERED THEIR MESSAGE THROUGH SOURCE OF FEAR ABOUT LIFE AFTER DEATH

THROUGH THEIR UNDERSTANDING AND HAVE APPLIED LOGIC TO THEIR

EXLPRESSIONS.

SO IF WE SIKHS AGREE TO THE ILLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF CHAAURASSI LAKH JANAM THEN IT IS THE SAMEN AS MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS DO

SO IT SEEMS THAT OUR GURU'S HAVE BEEN IGNORANT IN THIS ASPECT TO CREATE FEAR AFTER ALL THEY WERE SIMPLE HUMAN BEINGS.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

moderator note: Please, edit your post as we don't allow CAPS letters.

if we pray gurus more than their message

we are doing same as christians are doing with the christ and muslims with mohammad.

the matter here arises no guru ever propagated to do anything that might have happened in his life and neither does gurbani which is universal has any concern with life of any idividual.

if our gurus were sons of god then why not christ and mohammad?

i agree what so ever you people say because you feel insecure when asked these type of questions.i apologise for it but still i am not clear

some body is relating it to the kakkars of guru gobind singh ji and somebody is trying to explain me whole of the guru granth sahib though i have deep respects for everybody.

But here comes the question again---if this is the realization for sikhs about hair then ---------why does this dual nature of sikhs to have faith in gurbani and bringing maryada which was not started by our gurus and nor stated anywhere in gurbani and even not practised by nine gurus and numerous saints who wrote beautiful scriptures of guru granth sahib.

oriental lifestyle is a fanatism of muslim religion though the effort of all the gurus were to bridge the differences in humanity.

i have a question though i know its answer but i want to see what you say about it.

we follow gurbani and live according to it on the path towards divinity

then where does the immaterial thing of shape and identity divides sikhs.

kabir ji says=========kabir preet eek saiyon aan naa dubidaa jaayae

baahvain laambai kesh baahvain kharaar mundaiyan.

i am not saying here to cut your hair those who like to keep it but there is no religious significance of hair in sikhism