Beast

he who poos last poos the longest.

If you're going to make a serious post then at least have the decency to spell your words properly!

I'm sorry for the harsh words but it almost seems as though you need to concentrate more on your spelling at school rather than the dietery offerings available to students.

*raised eyebrow*

Freed, you certainly have a lot of time on your hands.... :shock:

a lot of "free" time some would say.

get it? eh, eh? I said "free" and your name is Freed.

*smug*

bad to the bone people, bad to the bone. 8)

so good he had to say it twice....

erm....

I know Sukha and I like him.

Now, although u some of u guys will probably know him a lot better than me....I get the feeling that he'd be reading this and cringing.

Stop shoving him on a pedestal! He's not perfect, but he is an exceptional role model for many Sikhs.

ps abt the dancing bit....have you ever seen Sukha dance? :shock:

he once sang to me at 5am....but that's our likkle secret. The black man with the grey hair was also pleased.

i'm so glad I'm young.

yay spice girls!

very much agree.

I have no qualms buying a CD if it's genuinely good. But I won't give me away to those that have one semi-decent track, and about 7 crap tracks.

Remember B21's "EP"? What a rip-off!

^ no he shouldn't in my opinion.

He used his brains and in turn gave Sikhs a good name by handing in a 28 page dossier (compiled by Sikh Coalition). Well thought out I reckon!

isn't Clarke's a better name?

^ erm...no.

he heard about what happened so asked for his opinion to be made public. If these guys think they are doing seva by beating up an old man who interviewed some1 else who did share their viewpoint, then why not face him? He also does not share the viewpoint of the fanatics therefore should they not do "panthic seva" and approach him?

Niddar Singh asked for the following to be made public:

he does not believe that Baba Deep Singh fought with their head on their hand, therefore could the fussars please try to jump him? Or are they only comfortable fighting old men?

^ there was a guest on the radio show who said that Baba Deep Singh did not fight with their head in their hand. So these fussars decided to beat up an old man rather then confront the guy who made the statement.

aaah yeah.

back to my original (dumb?) question that kinda got overlooked:

is there any merit in deliberately doing 2 opposite excercises in the same session... e.g. doing chest & biceps instead of chest & triceps?

i use to come on the forum a longggg time ago, saw a pic of him , it was his avatar, jeeeeez, hes a beast, havnt seen him post in a long time though

he a uk singh?

there is only one beast.

8)

(ps i'm on about me)

mate was saying that he deliberately does chest/biceps on one day, and back/triceps on another day so that he works totally different parts of the body.

thoughts?

good girl

url is messed up

I thought Khalsa of old would make any Muslim converts eat raw pork to prove that the conversion was genuine?

I always thought that this was a universally accepted historical account?

What about Gurus hunting?

Bani as I understand it is open to interpretation depending on the knowledge of the reader.

We were not around at the times of the Gurus therefore we cannot assume what their characters without firsthand recorded accounts.

Source:Sri Gur Partap Suraj Granth (thanks to Vijaydeep Singh for the info)

Beast Ji,

I wouldn't worry to much about that sakhi. I personally am not convinced by it. Sakhis are collections of heard stories put together by individuals after the Guru's lives. There will be some errors in them by way of statistics and human error.

I would focus on the sakhis which can be cross referenced across different sources and which do not condradict Bani or our Guru's characters.

It is no big mystery that our history does contain some inaccuracies!

I always thought that this was a universally accepted historical account?

What about Gurus hunting?

In order to walk this path we need to 1st have complete faith in our Guru, and then we need to give our head to Guru - this means putting Guru's will higher than ours, listening to him, to his instructions, to his advice, to his warnings, to his rules......

but how then does this fit with the example I gave regarding Guru Gobind Singh Ji pouring searing hot oil over corrupt masands? Why not punish them in a different way?

u asked me for proof regarding a certain famous Singh "dancing".

Can I ask you for contemporary proof regarding Singhs having 5 kakaars as opposed to treh mudra?

There's plenty more to say regarding this......(bit late at the moment I'm afraid)

lol, when i made this post it was with a good thought in mind. but it was late at night and i was too tired to elaborate.

and now i can't remember what the point was!

I asked this question on another forum, but as usual it ended up as a mud-slinging feast.

Recent comments in the music zone (that as bhangra is not gurmat it shouldn't be on a Sikh Awareness website) made me think about this topic once again.

Your thoughts would be appreciated!

following on from the meat debates, a lot of the pro-vegetarians used the argument that Bani "forbids" meat.

This got me thinking - is Adi Granth a set of rules that we should adhere to so that God won't "punish" us?

I really can't identify with this - seems too much like orthodox Christianity to me.

To me, the Adi Granth has represented a spiritual guide to getting closer to God. I've never seen it as a prescriptive set of procedures to follow.

As a side point:

There are no shortage of people who use Adi Granth to criticise meat as a food source. But yet surely Guru Granth Sahib is also against ego, greed, anger, etc. Yet there is no controversy when people display those traits. And what about killing? There is a huge debate over killing animals, yet some of our Gurus killed men. And is fighting for dharam the only reason they killed? How could the situation where Guru Gobind Singh Ji poured hot oil over the corrupt masands be deemed dharam? I actually agree with Guru Gobind Singh Ji's actions - because if you look at the circumstances of that era, those masands deserved what they got. But if we consider Adi Guru Granth Sahib as a rulebook, then Guru Gobind Singh Ji was wrong!

Just my thoughts.

i'm making a thread.....