Jump to content

princess_sonia

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by princess_sonia

  1. so. if i undertand it right... after the clonolism, the nihangs where not GONE, they were still there, but were goign throug a stagnation state, were they at a FLAT stage? meaning no action, no reation? when you say stagnation, what actually do u mean by it? Do you say Stagnation, as in Parcharwise? "Shastar vidya" and other educationwise (for themself, not parchar)? ACTIONwise? or popularity wise?
  2. and how do you intend on doing that? with "shastar Vidya" and recruting, and litterature-history, Bani And Bana Education?????
  3. hahhahaha.... thats good actually... what about truthsingh and the other administrators? are they happy with their performances???? ;-) Giving themself a warning too?? hehe
  4. Lalleshvari ji... you say: "nihangs are the only left"... and then you say "give it a new life".. i probably ( ;-) ) misunderstood, but if the nihuangs are still left... meaning not extinguished.. then how come they need a NEW life yaar! that ya mean by this? exaplain.
  5. no dictionnary handy, brother? I don't see any word that you might not understand, ji.
  6. People need to acknowledge that God alone is Lord of Life, from natural conception through natural death.
  7. <<The Guru gave the True Command; why should we hesitate to proclaim this? His sons did not obey His Word; they turned their backs on Him as Guru. These evil-hearted ones became rebellious; they carry loads of sin on their backs. Whatever the Guru said, Lehna did, and so he was installed on the throne>> Hey man.. its written in English, yaar.... what dont you understand about it? Need dictionnary? hehehe.
  8. Mahayana Buddhust... hmmm..... you know what.. people here can hardly understand SIKHI.... well i think a person is described by his deeds... well too bad at at the end (which is according to you) his spiritual stage was kindda destroyed... if his "Osho seems to be another example of someone who had the experience, could beautifully elucidate upon it, was blessed with incredible chit" was STRONG ENOUGH.... his FAME would not have ruined him!!!!!!!.
  9. I have a question lalleshvari ji...... you said "I personally don't mind any ceremony as long as the lavan are recited. The Nirankari type of mariage was quite a new thing actually and only became a norm after 1909. Apart from the Namdharis there is also mention of havan in mariage ceremonies of the Nihangs. " 1) Mind telling us here in which book or granth is says that that "nirankari type" of marriage became a norm?? any quote? 2) where can i find the informaiton about NIHUNG marriage where havan is mentionned??? any quote? thankx.
  10. the old man probably died of HIV/AIDS as the mystry illness...
  11. about OSHO.. read this guys... http://www.sannyasworld.com/modules.php?op...order=0&thold=0
  12. Thank you amrit dollarsingh ;-) i guess poeple dont know the meaning of the word PRIVATE. And has only ONE thing in mind as robot, not humans... let alone being human... NOT SIKHS EITHER! *soneone who LEARNS stuff from GURU and not be the master and tell others how NAAM IS DONE! thankx anyways.
  13. Like Jassa, i dont agree either with telling others about how i was taught to do simran.. and no i havent taken amrit from AKJ or taksal, etc. But logically, i dont think it is RIGHT to tell others how i was taught to do it. Amrit is like a "rebirth", its a start of a new life. Take is this way, when a woman gives birth to her child does she expose herself to everyone???? no. When a child is born, the woman legs are covered. Privacy? Woman "body" or the child's birth?... hmmm.... I dont think a women, gives add on internet or in new papers telling everyone to come out and see her to tell everyone how she gave birth to her child with all the details,... no is kept quiet, private... It stays between those who were at the "ceremony" mom-dad-husband,doc nurses... its the same thing with naam simran... it is a private ceremony.. isnt it? or is it done in public???? by public i mean, done in front pf people other then those who are actually taking amrit? i dont think so. If its done privatelly, that means there is something private about it! Everything that is done during amrit sanchar is private, including all the talks between the abhlakhees and the panj pyarays. If a person goes for peshi because he did paraya sang, i dont think he would like the rest of the world to know about it!?... EVERYTHING done during a amrit sanchar is private. everything that happens during a amrit is private. FOr god's sake its a private ceremony, and thats the way it should be and stay!! anyways, i dont agree on telling people how to do simran.... cause its like you being A PANJ PYARA AND GURU!,.. are you? i seriously doubt. what is the difference between all those "dehdharee gurus" giving out mantar etc and tru sikhi? thats the difference... THE PANJ PYARAYS! the panj gives naam, the panj give how to live your sikhi... cause during that special private ceremony, the panj pyarays are THE GURU.... who care about if or not they told you to keep quiet about naam simran or whatever... that a private ceremony, you neighbor or boss from work was not invited to joina nd WATCH the ceremony, it was done privately, so shut up and keep it that way. and no by giving out the WAY OF DOING NAAM, will not help anyone... beleive me... its the jaag, by amrit-khanday dee pahul, that will help. if youa re giving out the way of doing naam, its like you are telling someone how to make Dahee valee lasee, without dahee... it doesnt work like that my dear fellows, i tried. do no. its not right to diclose anything about any PRIVATE ceremony, woul dit be amrit sanchar, the birth of a child, the bed time with your wife.. anything... keep them to yourself... if the way you are telling has helped YOU in attaining a certain level of sprituality, how did you determine the level of sprituality int he first place?and if you are at a certain very high level that ALOOWS you to give out the way to attain the ultimate GOD-Guru anyways, you would not be here chatting up people, and telling then anything, you would be doing naam simran THAT way of yours. So..... keep it to yourself. it not only confuses others in search, but bashing out the name of panj pyarays... saying MY panj said this and YOUR panj said that... so, better keep it quiet. Thank.
×
×
  • Create New...