Jump to content

OnPathToSikhi

Members
  • Posts

    381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by OnPathToSikhi

  1. Why do you feel that I have no knowledge? Do you think the world belongs to the "knowledgeable"?
  2. I would like to share the same sentiment. If your statement is directed at me, then let me say that the forum members can have my name as the top slanderer if they rightly feel so. I came to this form to only learn before I could I can even contribute, but could not resist when heaps and heaps of trash is being written liberally about Sikhs, our Gurus and Gurbani ... This was, is and will NEVER be accepted .. no matter what! I don't think any Sikh who is at a "Sikh" forum would have enmity with anyone based on their faith or religion. There are some who are trying to create such differences and I am well aware (like others) who the culprits are.
  3. First let me say that I am not portraying myself as a "good example of Guru Da Sikh". But I also know that I am trying (at least) to be Guru Da Sikh. That said, nothing is going to stop me from saying what I have to say. The whole reason of the post was to bring forward a contrasting fact to the hollow and glorified indian mars mission. I am not stooping low when I say something is wrong when I find something wrong. Like I had mentioned earlier you are wrong in comparing an individual psychopath and criminal to a bogus and cultural "system" that is accepted in a wider community. Signs of an enslaved (very, very deep rooted) minds. Tribal or otherwise the "culture" came from somewhere.
  4. Giving an insane lunatic and a criminal a tankhiya? An individual who does not understand what it is being human what will he understand about tankhiya.
  5. What happened? Truth hurt? You can make a point per your understanding, but stay away from criticizing Bhai Maskeen Ji directly or indirectly. This is in direct reference to your quote "no wonder maskeen is "well read profound thinker" for this ignoramus, racist lowlife."
  6. You are wrong in your comparison here. The pandher-moninder guy is a psychopath and a criminal and should be dealt with such. The dog marriage is indicative of "acceptance" of a deep rooted bogus "cultural" system. The marriage is being performed in a wider community that is accepting this.
  7. This is really sad and pathetic at the same time. What is surprising is that the "bride" seems to be in full agreement with this nonsense hoping the dog is going to take away her misfortunes. I see this news in stark contrast with all the chest beating that is going on with the mars mission. Both these news put together have a spectrum highlighting india's racist mentality. I wonder if there are any rules for the guys. I mean marry a guy to a rat maybe to take away the guys misfortunes? We have a few bahmans in the house. Let us check with them.
  8. All the dog probably needs is a pair of dark glasses and a tux ... or maybe a sherwani. :-)
  9. A tail of love! Indian teen marries stray dog By Chris Perez September 3, 2014 | 10:34am Modal Trigger Previous Next 1/19 Barcroft Media An 18-year-old girl in India has taken a stray dog to be her paw-fully wedded husband, to have and to pet, from this day forward — or at least until her evil juju is gone! Mangli Munda is from a remote village in the eastern Indian state of Jharkhand, where local elders threw together an extravagant wedding because a local guru convinced the teenager’s parents she was under an evil spell and that marrying a man would only bring destruction to the family and the community, Barcroft reports. But the four-legged groom, named Sheru, may soon need a ceremony of his own because the canine will ultimately serve as a vessel for Munda’s misfortunes. “I am marrying a dog because the village elders believe that my evil spell will be passed on to the dog,” she said. “After that is done, the man I will marry will have a long life.” Munda was not a happy camper when told she would have to wed Sheru, but she knew she would be following in the footsteps of her village peers, who were also forced to marry stray pooches. “My villagers say that many girls like me have followed this ritual and they have gotten rid of their evil spells and are living happy lives now,” she said. “Many weddings like this have taken place in our village and also the other neighboring villages. This is a custom that we thoroughly believe in.” Treating the dog as they would a man, the locals decked him out in ceremonial tribal garments and danced alongside him to traditional drumming. “Apart from the fact that the groom is a dog, we followed all customs,” said Munda’s mother, Seems Devi. “We respect the dog as much as we would respect a normal groom.” Around 70 members of Munda’s village and family attended the ceremony, which elders said was the only way Munda would be able to enjoy a harmonious life, according to Barcroft. “We had to make sure that the evil spell is destroyed,” said Munda’s father, Sri Amnmunda. “And marrying a dog is the only way to get rid of the bad luck.” Munda will now have to live with Sheru and raise him for the next few months, but luckily the marriage will not truly affect her love life because village customs say she is free to marry again without having to go through the hassle of a doggy divorce. Now all she has to do is find the man of her dreams. “I will marry a man one day,” she said. “It is the dream of every girl to marry a Prince Charming. So I am also waiting for my prince.”
  10. Why do you say so? Are you under duress? Anyway, you are wrong here.
  11. Nothing. Since the militants fight was with the government and a failed judicial system. Militants never targeted the innocents. There was a lot of gundh that was inducted by the state to create a negative image of the militants and hide it's own failure. So all the "hindu killings" that you are trying to question was done by these crooks. State sponsored black cats are well known. If you try to get answers to Amar's questions, that might perhaps help you get a rational understanding of the events that took place.
  12. Read again and eat your own sh*t. Let me know if you need more.
  13. Let him figure it out himself. Then you can start your "job" to reverse that.
  14. Victimhood? This is what the likes of you want to dream. I am just stating what is I believe any sane human would agree to at-least. Your hate for Sikhs is at par with what the al-qaeda, ISIS etc hate the West.
  15. Speak up on atrocities committed by kps gill, cm beant singh , etc. When do you think the Khalistan movement started? Do you even know the reasons?
  16. Peace achieved from the blood of innocents is short lived. Glory on the blood of innocents is false.
  17. Unless you bring forward what beant singh and the other cronies did, how can you say anything about Rajoana. You cannot turn a blind eye to what Sikhs have gone through just so you can justify your own personal views. If you know already, Rajoana was a cop and had seen first had the crime being committed on the innocents by the so called secular "government". You say "The government members who were in power during this period should be investigated and pay for their crimes but equally ..". Did you just wake up? You are in denial.
  18. You are indirectly if you do not bring into perspective the atrocities committed by CM beant singh and his gang of terrorists. No I am not in support of terrorists or terrorism and neither is any other Sikh in my opinion. Your own views of CM beant singh, kps gill, kuldip brar, etc. What do you think about them and their actions. Rajoana is not a terrorist because he was fighting injustice. Wrong. Where did you get this? You have to else your terming Rajona as a terrorist is baseless. Honestly I can't and I don't think anyone can.
  19. No Sikh justifies the killing of the innocent. Per you statements you seem to be justifying the "other side" of Rajoana - CM Beant Singh and gang. So you think he was "dharmee"? You need to read through both sides to come up with your views. Maybe you are not ready or do not want to face the truth.
  20. No it is not simply because Sikhs oppose terrorism and have never sided with anyone supporting terrorist/jihadhist menatlity. The Hindu saffron brigade and the islamic jihadist are the two faces of the same coin. The air india bombing and the whole Panjab turmoil was/is created by india to "produce" fake fascists "Sikhs" who would rather believe that India is their "caretaker".
  21. Are you a Sikh? If yes, then probably you can find out the answer yourself.
×
×
  • Create New...