JungChamkaur

lmao you guys cant even compete with kangra who defeated mughals 52 times... rajputs of rajasthan are a stretch. please go do the math and then talk. even dasambani praises the katoch raja who slew many brave warriors and shouted kaal everywhere he went. they later defeated ranjit too and retook kangra and siba defeated ranjit too. mian dido defeated sikhs over ten times. have some shame... 84 looms over your airheads.

its funny you say that because i have encountered more coward sikhs than brave in my life... and that goes with every other community as well... and its also funny that khalistanis were saved by my relatives from beanta... yet you talk. have some shame coward. raise your head wen you get revenge for 84. until then shut your mouth and sit down and go calculate about the 200,000+ rajputs who have fought invaders and cry to yourself about your false khalistani narrative. udham sigh kills one official and hes the greatest... rajputs kill over 20 and their nothing? great logic.. dare to learn.

history exposes khalistani lies... sikhs have a played a major role only in punjab... rajputs and marathas have sacrificed more lives, conquered more land, killed more enemies than sikhs.... anyone want to volunteer to get the numbers? you like sukha jinda so much yet you cant stand the fact that other koma have killed dozens more military officials.... you are the epitomy of shamelessness and ignorance. sikhs will never ever rise to great heights as long as we have losers like you. anyone who can calculate and read and analyze history properly can easily see the overshadowing impact of rajput marathas on indias struggle against foreigners.. like i said, please try to understand feudalism and hegemony before trying to chart history. the numbers will speak for themselves anyways and remember mian dido and the heinous acts done by ranjits soldiers in jammu when you lie about 100% purity. also remember how many times mian dido defeated ranjit compelling him to seek the aid of gulab singh the clan-traitor who then betrayed ranjit as well.

how do you feel about sikhs' role in destroying punjab as we speak?

dont forget to include 50,000+ women who have done jauhar... but add that later or leave it out.. the numbers will still devastate your false narratives.

do this: calculate all the shaheeds of sikhs and the damages they caused and their regions' sizes and then compare them with each rajput clan and come back then.... you will see the truth for yourself and perhaps you can stop being a fanatic then.

u cant handle the truth like all fudu ass khalistani losers... sikhs have done very little damage to invaders in comparison to other koms. time to wake up fro your slumber you fudu ass jatt liars.

you people are all losers afraid to read history thats the problem

why would i be against sikhs, im sikh.. im against your black and white historical lies.

rajputs also joined khalsa too.. or did u forget that...

rajputs were not illegitimate children... tat would be the jatts. rajputs are literally the sons of the kings that inherited the lands. these new gujjar scholars are trying to rewrite history because they come from villages where they are chelas.

of course they should have allied with the gurus. many rajputs did. im not sure why the jaipur jodhpur ones didnt, probably because of casteism and tribal mentality. nevertheless, they were baagi time and time again. their sacrifices against invaders cant be ignored or denigrated just because you want to create a black and white history of good and bad as if there is any kom that is 100% pure good.

and about the suryavanshi point... ask guruji why hes claiming to be something thats fake according to you and your source... perhaps youll became anti-dasam bani right now just to void this.. i wont be surprised.

many rajputs fought ghazni and some allied themselves with the ghaznavids because of tribal warfare. rajputs were never really united. even rana sanga was betrayed by shiladitya or vikramaditya i forget. this gujjar nonsense is so trivial... many tribes overlap jats gujjars and rajputs.. thats tribe specific info. not applicable to all rajputs.

whats your stance on sikhs helping abdali?

i think they should not have fought wars with the marathas and allied themselves with them against abdali.

how about nawab kapur singh? why did he take a muslim title then revolt again? its ok for him to secure regions under his rule but no for no one else right... stupid idiots.

ask any old buddha about patiala and the rulers' many "wives"....

ahahahah courage for atacking a 90 year old right? pulling someone by their mustahces? not coming out the fort when attacked by mian dido? maharaja patiala used to stand on his roof and pick up any girl he wanted and ranjits wives were looked after properly? ahahahah all kings have great accomodations for their wives ad mistresses! ahahaha you FOOL! and as far as jai singh goes, ask guruji why he had no problem with jai singh but you have the audacity to? baysharam losers.

let me repeat this tale about the lie that only mewar and hada chauhans fought: 23. Rajput chiefs present at the Siege of Chittorgarh Fort : • Rao Jaimal Singh Rathod • Pratap Singh Jugawat • Rawal Sahidas Chundawat • Rawat Dudaji Sangawat • Rana Ram Singh Tomar of Gwalior • The Chief of Baidla • Rawat Khanji Chauhan of Kotharia • The Panwar Chief of Bijolian • Jhala Sardar of Bari Sadri • The Sonigara Rao of Jhalore • Ishwardas Rathod • Karam Singh Kachawah • Duda Sadani Kachawah • Kala Singh Rathod

funny thing is that jai singh rebelled against the mughals with mewar

yes its the same jai singh... i think it was him who gave seva and is the patron of bangla sahib as wel if i am not mistaken.

the stupid article you posted is some random fudu like yourself lmao its so funny how stupid you people are. no wonder your all losers with no importance. and when you talk about abdali dont forget to talk about the patiala rulers who loved him.... hes also sikh btw if you didnt know. this whole idea of daughters and sister is utter rubbish.. rajputs never cared for their mistresses daughters... do you think your king ranjit cared? or the maharaja patiala cared when he was raping sikh women in the dozens? wake up and smell the coffee buddy, illegitimate progeny is never loved by anyone, hence their abysmal life and status as bastards and whores.

the doubtful bravery article is actually not credible at all.. its part of the congress history that wants to eradicate all events of indian history portraying resistance.. and marathas fought rajputs on several occasions... lost many times to rajputs as well... also the whole impure shit your talking about... this has nothing to do with brits... this is how rajputs are... the parents both have to be rajput, even if you want to adopt a child to carry on your lineage he has to be of full blood rajput stock. rajputs were never crushed.. chauhan killed ghori and his son carried on the struggle against afghans as mentioned in my previous posts... if you read congress/rss history then surely india will look like a sad losing nation.. its the same policy towards sikhs as rajputs and marathas... destroy history of resistance and make them all westernized, this is why 99% punjabi songs are about being western and white... its the same process. indigenous history is suppressed. do the math yourself and look at how many rajputs have fought invaders and how many have retained kingdoms for how long and their sizes and you will see how pathetic ranjit singhs raj really is.

you should really look into mian dido's ass whooping of ranjits army over ten times and the sibas kicked ranjits army out of their lands in himachal.