Kuttabanda2

hanuman "Jee", Shiv "Jee" and "Sri" Ram Chander "Jee Maharaj" aren't what Sri Guru Gobind Singh Jee addressed them as. Jena Loka da Jaloos Te Paarda-Faash Saade Pita ne kita, ouna de paer Chumi Jana? They aren't respected by our own Guru, I'm not sure why you do so with your prefixes and suffixes. They aren't going to give you Naam or Amrit, they themselves haven't gotten it, Shiv, Ram, Brahma, Vishnu, Indar, etc. don't even have good Charitars and have done some questionable deeds. Chaubees Avtar, Braham Avtar, and Ram Avtar da zikr kar, aapi pata laag Ju. And It's not a historical event. More than certainly, our Kacheras weren't given to us by flying monkeys. *correction* monkeys, not apes as I said before.

However it doesn't quite state that a flying ape passed it down to the Khalsa.

The dictum of the Panj Pyare being all and only men was made and followed by the Damdami Taksal, Nihang Dals, and Nanaksar. The Akhand Kirtani Jatha for one, condones women being in the Panj and even practiced it.

There are questions arising about Talwinder Singh Babbar or even Babbar Khalsa carrying out such an act. Many Singhs ( that knew Parmar and others) I have talked to said that, intellectually, Parmar wasn't capable of plotting and carrying out such an act of Terrorism, the whole history around the air India bombings is very cloudy and ambiguous.

Sri Dasam Granth Sahib is Gurbani from Jaap to the Hikaayatan, it's 100% proven to be Gurbani. There is a lot of literature on it. Bundkhoj and the anti-DG lobby need to be countered, that's all. Appi fukria maar maar ke thak jaan ge, bas sawala de jawab deo.

Dhan Dhan Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee <3

I have the 'Gurmat Rehat Maryada' book (not the booklet) and says nothing about Hanuman giving a Kacherra.

Yes it has in the 'Att Khalsa Mool Mantar'.

oral Tradition is obviously less credible than written sources. It goes from from oral reiteration to a game of telephone really quickly. Both sides (Nihangs, and Singh Sabha Akalis) have their own narratives. Referring to a person who hasn't seen the event himself yet remembers it orally is of no use.

TSingh isn't an authority in the subject. If you make a claim, then there must be solid and concrete evidence to support it. Even If he has a lot of knowledge on the subject, his words aren't the Gospel truth. So unless there is reference to Sewaoanthis to being clean shaven, during the time of the Guru, the claim is just that, a claim, not a fact. Loka dia gala ehvi mananya ta bohut hi Kabudh gaal hai.

I would disagree. Is there any reference whatsoever that Bhai Kanhaiya and the like didn't have Kes? I' not denying the existence of Sehajdharis, but rather hold the stance that Kes are an integral part of Sikhi and Puraatan Sehajdharis kept Kes at the least. Additonally, you make claims of supporting yourself with "Authentic" sources. Yet when it comes to your arguement you become quite acceptant of these un-authentic ones. Yes, I am calling you out for quoting Sau Sakhi because your dumb@ss previously berailed paapiman and me for referring to Desa Singh's Rehatnama which again, is at the same level in terms of Authenticity as Sau Sakhi.

​Which Taksal book? Which publisher? and what year?

​How is pedophilia, genocide, rape, looting, upon other atrocities mistakes? No one is insulting the religion, they're criticizing it, there's a fine line between criticism and Slander.

​The Qur'an is not a beautiful book, rather it's a devilish and nightmarish constitution sheer Totalitarianism and Muslim Supremacy. It's time people stop lying to themselves and blindly accepting precepts. The Qur'an's violent verses are really clear, there is no ambiguity regarding it's violent verses.

​Actually, the Arabic is in prose, however, there are no other sound, rational, accurate, reasonable, or logical interpretations of those verses because Koranic language is quite simple and clear, there are little to no reasonable allegories or metaphors in this instance.

​It's not necessary for you shove your hatred for him up our @sses at any given opportunity. Yeah, we get it. You have a grudge against him. Move on.

​Dude, just read at least 4-5 chapters of Koran, it's like a manual of totalitarian and supremacist evil.

​ ​Dasam Patshah says something totally different about Muhammed.

​You can read Syed Pritpal Singh's books or you can request the family either in England or India to look at the manuscripts and their copies.

​Is there any academic linguistic analysis that proves that? Indeed Guru Gobind Singh Sahib Jee translated the Purans, but the Gurus have clarified their position regarding Devi/Devtas and have presented the composition in a way that is in line with Sikh philosophy.

​Though I don't support genocide, I do agree that Islam and it's followers threaten non-Islamic heritage, cultures, communities, and societies. I've seen it with my own eyes. I doubt they'll find much in museums, since Muslims choose to obliterate almost everything non-Islamic.

​ Perhaps because the rapid Muslim growth in population and their religious beliefs threaten non-Islamic communities and Societies. Many Muslims and Muslim communities that I've personally seen almost all over Europe (North, Eastern, and Southern) and Russia do not integrate well enough, and deep down don't really like to accept change and adaption but rather prefer having their ways of life, government, and Society implemented there ( European Countries that the immigrated to).

Ahhh the Gorreh's actions uncovered again! Any European (because that's what they are) living in Australia, South Africa, and the Americas is not entitled to the land just because of their race. They did the same here in America, they committed genocide against the Natives and crammed the remaining ones into reservations. How disgusting.

​To begin with, how do you define Sehajdhari? as a Mona? Of all these sources, have any of them mentioned whether these sehajdharis were Kesdharis or not? And are they proven authentic? Quoting the Sau Sakhi is the equivalent of quoting a Modern Protestant Bible, it's heavily diluted, far from original and authentic. Even if Sau Sakhi mentions Sehajdhari, it doesn't serve as concrete evidence, since it has been tampered with and polluted to such an extant that not even one Sakhi can't be considered authentic. It's Ironic how you speak of and define "Authentic Sources" but later on quote Sau Sakhi. Additionally, do you know if the Hukamnamas you quoted are authentic or not? If I'm not wrong, Scholar(s) threw most of these out the window. Keeping Kes was considered one of the minimum requirements of a Sikh, a Sehajdhari is supposed to gradually adopt Rehat and strive towards becoming an Amritdhari/Khalsa, as the name implies, so even if they did exist in the Guru's time, they were supposed to take Amrit sooner or later. Furthermore, Old does not equal Authentic. How can you be so sure that someone drinks Sharab if they're quoting Desa Singh's Rehatnama? I am most certainly sure that you stuff your mouth with a good steaming dose of sh*t before spewing it all over these forums.