Jump to content

ragnarok

Members
  • Posts

    159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by ragnarok

  1. On 3/27/2017 at 0:31 PM, Sat1176 said:

    I don't agree with what he is saying. I have heard a number of mahapursh teach this technique and the first time was years ago, in the audio simran instruction recording of Sant Baba Isher Singh (Rare Wale). He clearly stated in that, when one applies pressure on the navel you will eventually begin to feel the pulse behind it. When simran is synchronized with that pulse and dhyaan is placed there it would lead to manifestation of Rom Rom simran. He said Bakhari was done at the mouth, Madhma in Khant, Pasanti in the heart and Para at the navel. Maskeen ji also wrote about this in the book Prabhu Simran.

    You disagree with this? Why?

  2. Bit of advice please.

    What is the difference between agya chakr and ajna chakr? Can't find much online.

    I was told to do abhyas focusing on forehead but the point of focus seems to move around. Sometimes on the bridge of the nose, sometimes between eyebrows, sometimes it goes higher than this. When it goes higher it goes off to the right a little, i.e. it's no longer centred in the forehead.

    I have heard that you should not focus on dasam duar as a beginner - why would this be? Sometimes when I can't quiet my mind I take my focus there and my mind goes blank. I then carry on in the forehead.

    Quote

    ( between the eye brows) focus so hard and meditate so hard that you are exhausted consequently you will start meditating automatically on throat chakra with Madhma Bani (thought provoked automatic recitation) then focus so hard on madhma bani that it gets exhausted. Again consequently meditation will start in the heart and continue to the Nabhi (Navel). In the navel, guru’s jap awakens the kundalani in the navel. By doing this.,tenth door(dasva dwara) opens. By doing this technique your meditation process never stops and you are experience doesn’t break.

     

    Does this imply that when madhma bani starts focus should move to the throat rather than trikuti? Or should focus remain on trikuti but simran moves to throat? 

     

  3. Dear HaumaiSingh, find answers in red below

    Lol Dally Sensai, he didn't even read my p....

    I shall do as you say. I won't hold back.

    *touches right fist to left palm*

    *takes a bow*

    *looks at post to reply to*

    K Ragnarok you are dead. (metaphorically speaking)

    Every post is an exercise in duality. Duality is everything that is. It is fundamental lens through which we perceive the world. It is the world!

    And the world is not truth.

    Yes the goal of Sikhi is to transcend duality. Yes one who sees the truth cannot suffer from duality. I should f***ing know because I experienced that shiet and then I said it!

    You also said

    Which is all lies. I do not believe that someone who has seen truth even for an instant can speak such lies. Once you have a certain avastha you can see Oneness constantly. It is not even the highest avastha.

    Hence the f***ing metaphor of Lotus! The mud is the duality and the lotus is consciousness. Our consciousness is to rise from this duality the way the lotus rises out of mud.

    BUT

    It still lives in the f***ing mud! The mud is the world!

    And what is the world? Is it real? Is it separate from the one? No.

    How do you rise above the mud while living in it?

    You go into the state of Pure Consciousness through strict meditation (naam simran) or rarely by a lucky stroke of His Kirpa. Often both.

    Shut the f*** up.

    No. You speak like this and you claim to have seen the truth? You are nothing but an apologist for living in delusion.

    You are not enlightened. If you are then you should have answered my question right at the start instead of giving me crap. So stop making shiet up that you have not experienced.

    Please tell me what I have experienced.

    Yes it is! You are right. But what the f*** is Oneness? have you even tasted it?

    Constantly.

    How can you blab about something you don't know of?

    See above.

    Oneness is everything. It INCLUDES duality!

    Indeed.

    It's all inclusive. There is nothing outside of oneness, not even duality or ignorance. It's all part of the game (leela).

    I should f***ing know cuz I f***ing saw that shiet with my own eyes and then I described it to you!

    See what I said about delusion. You have seen nothing and it is evident from your tone.

    Are you keeping up?

    Why should I show you? Why don't you look it up?

    Learn to f***ing Google shiet. This is the 21st century. If you can go on a forum, you can damn well read Sri Granth.

    srigranth.org

    Copy- paste ਬਖਸਨਹਾਰ and ਦਾਤਾਰ. It won't break your fingers. I promise.

    Oneness includes the Ambrahamic God. It includes everything! It even includes you!

    The Abrahamic concept of god is delusion. it is not real. It is part of the play of maya. The definition of the Christian god since Constantine has been a lie; it has nothing to do with Jesus.

    But you wouldn't even know what is an Abrahamic God. You are too busy criticizing and pre-judge ... prejudice ... pre-judging other people who are trying to help you.

    And the language you are using is an Abrahamic one! English is not an Indian language. It has words derived from Sanskrit and other Indian languages but it's an Abrahamic language with concepts and words that use Abrahamic Mythology as their basis.

    1. English is not Abrahamic. It predates Christianity and is not from the middle east. Educate yourself, boy. 2. Point is that translations cannot be made properly into English as the right words do not exist. 3. Just because I speak a language does not mean I must subscribe to the mythology of the culture that spawned the language. The original culture behind English is pagan, not christian.

    Why the f*** are you speaking in English if you want to run away from Abrahamic beliefs so much?

    Speaking a language is not a belief.

    ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਬੋਲ! ਮੈਂ ਤੈਨੂੰ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ 'ਚ ਸਮਝਾ ਦੇਨਾ

    ਬਕਸ਼ਨ ਵਾਲਾ ਬਕਸ਼ਨਹਾਰ

    ਦਾਤਾਂ ਦੇਣ ਵਾਲਾ ਦਾਤਾਰ

    Why is it that you could not even recognize Gurmukhi words and yet recognize English words so easily?

    Where are you getting this? And you speak of prejudice? The ego present in your demeanour is astounding, as for your so called experience of the truth it is evident that this is nothing but a lie you told yourself and your peers in order to feed your out of control ego.

    eyk qUhI eyk quhI

    iDRgu jIvxu dohwgxI muTI dUjY Bwie

  4. Your post is an exercise in duality. Duality may be the law of the world but the point of Sikhi is to transcend duality. One who sees the truth cannot suffer from duality.

    You will always see God as separate from the Atma except in certain cases of spiritual experiences and during moments of hyper awareness."

    Disagree. An enlightened one is always in this state, the unenlightened should make a conscious effort to remember Oneness as truth. It is the whole point of simran.

    This is all in SGGS. He punishes, judges, forgives (ਬਖਸਨਹਾਰ comes to mind), gives (ਦਾਤਾਰ another common word) protects etc.

    Show me. Your mindset is emblematic of what my post is about. You're an Abrahamic and don't even know it. You believe in the idea of a separate 'god' floating about and meddling in day to day affairs of people with only a loose appreciation of the possibility of one-ness.

×
×
  • Create New...