Jump to content

Reader

Members
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Reputation Activity

  1. Thanks
    Reader reacted to tva prasad in Dhadrianwala Vs Great Sikhs   
    Even if, Vidya Martand Srimaan 108 Gyani Gurbachan Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale has such a respectable title, he did indeed live up to it. Unlike,  maybe someone you like to follow, he spread the truth among the masses. 
  2. Like
    Reader got a reaction from chatanga1 in Dhadrianwala Vs Great Sikhs   
    If you want a debate then define the words. I can say everything you're saying is Brahmanism, all you're doing is throwing words around as you dont have a leg to stand on. We're not asking for other people's definition, we're asking for yours. 
    So you're fine if they speak ill about the writings of Bhai Gurdas Ji? or Sri Dasam Granth Ji (let me guess, the Dasam Granth was a Brahmin's rouse to lead the sikhs astray blah blah blah). 
    "Great" Scholars is actually hilarious. You've yet to answer my question. You started talking about Science so tell me, if Guru Gobind Singh Ji appeared before you and said the world is flat and only 700 years old, what would you say?
    Ahead of his time? What a load of nonsense. Texts dating back well before the british take over of the Sikh empire all state the same things as the texts written during it. The funny thing is Dhillon is so far up his own rear end he dismisses anything written prior to Singh Sabha that doesn't agree with him. That dude is about ahead of his time as the Catholic church was in medieval times.
    The fact that you quoted this Sakhi (I asked you for the source of your version and im still waiting for it btw) and still don't realise that the stick wasn't magic because it was a magic stick but powerful because it was held by Guru Ji, is another sign that you have no idea what you're talking about. 
    So...I'll recap for you since its apparent you lack the intelligence to read things and stay on topic. My questions are the following for you, please answer them as simply as possible (I'm sure that won't be too hard). If you refuse to do so, I'll take it you have no reply. 
    1) What is your defination of Brahmanism?
    2) if Guru Gobind Singh Ji appeared before you and said the world is flat and only 700 years old, what would you say? Would you say "Yes Guru Ji you are right" or something else?
    3) The Sakhi about Guru HarKrishan Ji, please provide the source for your one. Thank you. 
    4) Bhai Gurdas Ji said that in the presence of a congregation Guru Nanak Dev Ji melted into thin air and disappeared. Was Bhai Gurdas Ji making stuff up in your professional opinion?
     
    That's is also Brahmanism as Brahmins used that phrase long before Sikhs.
  3. Like
    Reader got a reaction from chatanga1 in Dhadrianwala Vs Great Sikhs   
    no offence but @chatanga1 has been very patient towards you. You want to discuss Brahmanism that's fine, so the members of this forum will indulge you. In return we asked you to define what Brahmanism is, posting videos of Jhatka and other things isn't a definition. Put it into words, What is Brahmanism? That's all anyone has asked on this thread, yet you scuttle around the topic.
    Again its apparent you either struggle to understand what is being asked or are purposely being dense about it so let's just be upfront. 
    Define what is Brahmanism like a dictionary defines what the word "Planet" might mean. I'm sure you're capable of this since it seems to be your favourite word.
  4. Like
    Reader got a reaction from chatanga1 in Dhadrianwala Vs Great Sikhs   
    Then according to you Amrit sanchar must be made up since its clearly not explicitly stated in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. 
    They broke the arrogance of Pandit Ji and as a result he realised he barely knows anything about his own text. I asked you to provide a historical source of your version of the Sakhi, preferably dated back before the time of Singh Sabha. Even in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji certain miracles are mentioned, Waheguru brought a cow back to life for Bhagat Naamdev Ji, the entire story is recorded in there.
    No offence but Science isn't your Guru. If Guru Gobind Singh Ji appeared and said to you the world is flat, and we have no other planets in our solar system. Would you believe him? or would you believe science? Miracles haven't decreased, they're just less frequent as Kalyug goes on as no one has any spiritual ability at all, if any. Very few folk do. Science is great for explaining physical stuff, but Science also says God isn't real and out to prove it. 
    Brahmins offering water wasn't a miracle, that was a ritual. Now you're trying to muddle the two, firstly let's go back to my original question, the one you conveniently ignored. 
    ^ would you agree this happened as Bhai Sahib noted it down, or are you going to accuse him as well of exaggerating or outright lying? 
    Except one Ideology has no actual leg to stand on. Before you start accusing me of being a Taksali, I'm not. I've learnt from a whole host of sikhs with different beliefs and systems. Ideologies would be people like Udasis, Nirmalas, Nihangs etc. Missionaries aren't any of these because its all been conceived in the last 20 or so years. They have no actual lineage in sikh history and outright hate doubt anything that makes them uneasy. I have no problem with people like Udasis, Nihangs etc, I don't agree with them fully fyi but I do respect them because unlike missionaries they've studied contemporary sikh sources and actually formulated knowledge from them even if its not what I believe. 
  5. Thanks
    Reader got a reaction from paapiman in Dhadrianwala Vs Great Sikhs   
    So you don't believe Guru Ji can turn an illiterate person into a literate scholar? I've noticed twice in this single thread you bring up incidents in history recorded by various Sikhs and somehow (intentionally or not) try to insinuate they didn't happen. 
  6. Like
    Reader got a reaction from wjkkwjkf in Seeing Devtas in dreams   
    Physical forms, though in one instance Durga was a statue but came to life and became life-like (flesh and blood). Before this all started I did see her as a statue too. 
    I know I was seeing my previous lives because the day before I did an ardaas to God asking if he could bless me with some sort of vision about it, to help me make sense of some things happening in my life and why I'm like how I am. During the dream, I transitioned from various lives and then finally to mine. I obviously have no proof but when I was younger a Mahapurkh had told my father about who was I was in my past life, it all seemed to correlate fine so I went with it.
    I can reveal some details yeah, nothing too exciting though. I had a really bland life, In one life I was a man with a beautiful wife. I loved her dearly, we lived together in a huge place. Sadly My wife didn't feel the same way as me, she started having an affair with my brother, as a result they conspired to steal all  my wealth and kill me. One day when it was just us at home, they lead me into a room. While my wife and I were talking, my brother came up behind me and stabbed me in the back. At this point, I felt extreme pain where I was stabbed and woke up sweating. This explains a-lot about why I want to remain a celibate and not get married as well, why I'm not trusting of many people. Before this life (the lordly one), I was a horse. In another, I was a woman, was a man once Again. Honestly, there were a few more but they are really embarrassing.
    Thank you so much for the advice. That would explain why recently they seem to have desisted. I discussed them with my mother and my friend in depth. 
  7. Like
    Reader got a reaction from paapiman in Black Magic?   
    Sukhmani Sahib, Recite it daily. That is the ultimate protection from these kind of things.
  8. Like
    Reader got a reaction from jaikaara in Black Magic?   
    Sukhmani Sahib, Recite it daily. That is the ultimate protection from these kind of things.
  9. Like
    Reader got a reaction from tva prasad in Seeing Devtas in dreams   
    Physical forms, though in one instance Durga was a statue but came to life and became life-like (flesh and blood). Before this all started I did see her as a statue too. 
    I know I was seeing my previous lives because the day before I did an ardaas to God asking if he could bless me with some sort of vision about it, to help me make sense of some things happening in my life and why I'm like how I am. During the dream, I transitioned from various lives and then finally to mine. I obviously have no proof but when I was younger a Mahapurkh had told my father about who was I was in my past life, it all seemed to correlate fine so I went with it.
    I can reveal some details yeah, nothing too exciting though. I had a really bland life, In one life I was a man with a beautiful wife. I loved her dearly, we lived together in a huge place. Sadly My wife didn't feel the same way as me, she started having an affair with my brother, as a result they conspired to steal all  my wealth and kill me. One day when it was just us at home, they lead me into a room. While my wife and I were talking, my brother came up behind me and stabbed me in the back. At this point, I felt extreme pain where I was stabbed and woke up sweating. This explains a-lot about why I want to remain a celibate and not get married as well, why I'm not trusting of many people. Before this life (the lordly one), I was a horse. In another, I was a woman, was a man once Again. Honestly, there were a few more but they are really embarrassing.
    Thank you so much for the advice. That would explain why recently they seem to have desisted. I discussed them with my mother and my friend in depth. 
×
×
  • Create New...