samurai2

In general, he is pretty much giving the basic philosophical veechar on any dharam.  Am i the only one finding this hilarious.  Mate i need to dress up and make some serious money..

****on this site are very much oblivious 

3 hours ago, paganvegan said:

May be you were too young to sense any vibes at such an early stage of his development.

If you observe kids, they are very much energy sensitive. 

You may notice a pattern that young kids at the age of 2-7/8 they only go to those who are good in nature and reluctant to those who are not.( you know what i mean, the jealous aggitated aunty compared to the caring one)

Tav prasad held that at an age where he could independently judge. His judgement is something that is shared by many sikhs/singhs.

Cool, didn't know that. I'll look into that.

The only thing i was aware of was the black panthers.. 

On 9/5/2018 at 12:43 AM, Soulfinder said:

Veer ji they were a puran bramgyani. We are not even sant ji charan di dhoor or soil of their feet.

Who knows maybe Sant Ji had sewadars make special tea rather than the normal type of tea. 

 

Cos i did hear Sant Baba Isher Singh Ji Rara Sahib Wale they would drink green tea.

 

Indeed he was and still is.

In regards to tea and diet in general, it depends on your practice and what you want to achieve. That will in itself decide whether a food product or liquid is beneficial to you or not.

21 hours ago, paapiman said:

@samurai2 - Sri Satguru jee (Seventh Master) kept an army (2200 horsemen), as it was an order from his grandfather, Sri Satguru jee (Sixth Master).

Also, when Sixth Master was passing the Gurgaddi, Seventh Master came in Bir Ras and asked if he wanted him to smash the tyrants. Sangat was very surprised as they used to think of Seventh Master as being very peaceful and loving (as you alluded). 

 

Bhul chuk maaf

Seems like you and amardeep are modern representations of those 'surprised' with Gurus actions

I asked the question cos those sant ras Gurus kept an army because of their previous  Gurus/Elders orders.. you people here call your self the sons of Guru Gobind Singh and Shy away from arms legalisation..??.. 

15 hours ago, amardeep said:

What browser are you using ? 

 

It is possible but they would have to be really old then. Guru Har Rai had a small army that fought against the army of Aurangzeb during the succession wars with him and Darah Shikoh. 

Crome on iphone

One thing i fail to fathom is.. black is a colour of skin.. Indian Chinese is a nationality.. 

Ive never got why taveh call them selves black and they are lighter than me.. and im not dark at all..lol

On 9/3/2018 at 1:01 AM, Soulfinder said:

Veer ji @paapiman here is reason why tea should not be drank as it was stopped by Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindrawale.

 

Sant Baba Ajit Singh Hansiwale would drink half a cup of tea twice a day at least.

On 9/1/2018 at 8:05 PM, amardeep said:

Also in terms of Sikh history, the shastardhari aspect adapts to society. Guru Hargobind armed the Sikhs and raised an army because it was needed for warfare. During the tenure of the next three Gurus this army was slowly by slowly decreasing and then once the need arose it was again reassembled by Guru Gobind Singh Maharaj. Guru Har Rai kept an army of 2200 soldiers (small compared to the army of Guru Har Gobind) but there is no indication of any standing army of significant size during the rule of Guru Har Krishan and Guru Tegh Bahadur Maharaj. So in essence, the shastardhari notion can adapt to the circumstances of society in terms of what suits the Sikhs, and the people at large, the best.

What was the duration between Guru Har Rai's charai to when Guru Tegh Bahadur become shaheed?

Is it not possible  that Guru Hargobinds army was present in Guru Gobind Singhs fauj? If so the "gupt" aspect really comes into play

Why would Guru Har Rai even keep an army? The one Guru who got so bhairagi from accidentally pulling a petal from a flower?  

Thanks and a big up to the admin to give me a quick approval..much appreciated with all my humility 

And you need guys need to sort this format out. I quote on one page which gets deleted when i go to next page for a quote.. 

Admin sort this shit out

15 hours ago, paapiman said:

Imagine, a racist lunatic entering into a Khalsa school and killing scores of innocent Sikh children and that too, by a legal firearm. We definitely don't want that.

A "khalsa" school should have tyar bar tyar Singhs running it or at least protect it. So the whole idea of being victimised should be out of the question. 

It seems like the notion of your thinking about the Khalsa is a pointed pagh wala with a tied up beard that has taken"amrit"...also to add.. one who takes pride in being titled as a DR for completing phd

4 hours ago, amardeep said:

So to summarise. Me and papiman are afraid and Dalsingh is tough and brave 

Priceless..

sarcastic comments on someone who is abrupt and straight to the point.. compared to silence against the pappus and flowery people on here talking shite at times... 

The response on this topic indicates a clear distinction between a sikh and Singh's mentality. 

Its not an ego battle but the ultimate pursh is a sant sipahi... many here are just saintly peolple, they are not yodeh. 

"just" not being disrespectful..

Making weapons legal for a sikh in any country is a welcome all day

The fact they don't want weapons legal, just shows they are a bunch of rich boys who aint seen sh1te ..and live in a flowery world. 

ill need to be approved..ok

is anybody doing something in the states or Canada?

left wing right wing?..ok.lol...fukin.. joke

fukin nobs

On 8/18/2018 at 12:45 AM, samurai2 said:

He is well versed, but fell.too kaam..

Alot...like a few members here, ie admin and cut.

Its no hoo haa that a spiritual person falls for kaam....

look at previous post from 'kaurs' and how they(lucky and bhagat) readily respond, especially when it comes to physical intercourse.. 

 

To reiterate the point, pay attention..

I'm a bad pursh, so all good, but atleast  pay attention to the so called good pursh on sikhawareness....

Be ready people.. 

No dump analogies here.

meditate while we dump..lol

all  those impressed .. fukin pussies .. 

come to the battlefield... 

Also the please, sorry, thank you word that i need to get moderators approval .

bole so ne haal to all my sikhs...

@BhagatSinghPlease reply to your brother Lucky..

Lucky bro has a long speech but it's pretty much a simple philosophical  question...

On my phone right now, but will open a topic on why sikhs  admin cut.. and why they claim to be Guru gobind singhs sons when they act like a flowery admin cut at a time when sikh girls at the age of 9/10 are getting targeted for sexual exploitation.  

Also the flowery bitches meditating as if all is colourful...wake up and smell the shite..

@Lucky

any input on this being admin cut.

Where are bhagat and lucky for this convo...

admin cut

He is well versed, but fell.too kaam..

Alot...like a few members here, ie admin and cut.

Its no hoo haa that a spiritual person falls for kaam....

look at previous post from 'kaurs' and how they(lucky and bhagat) readily respond, especially when it comes to physical intercourse.. 

On 8/13/2018 at 9:06 PM, sarabatam said:

Yes, we've been struggling regarding traffic for few years now, but all it takes five consistent posters -20 posts a day, then five becomes 10 , 10 becomes twenty. If everyone can do their own part it will certainly help. Many thanks to paapiman, dalsingh, amardeep, lucky, sat1176 and others for consistently posting and engaging in threads. 

Mate its your ultra left wing mentality thats got things shaky...

sort your local peeps out first before you make global moves..fukin prick..

On 8/10/2018 at 3:24 PM, GuestSingh said:

The girls are so immature, have no clue what’s going on.

admin cut

One cannot fear a friend..

On 8/4/2018 at 8:57 PM, BhagatSingh said:

On some words pronouncing the Aunkar changes the meaning of the word to something else.

E.g. if you pronounce the Aunkar on ਜੋਰੁ it changes the meaning of the word. Instead of being Jor "power", it becomes Joru "wife".

The aunkar in ਜੋਰੁ is only there to indicate a singular, masculine word, so a singular power source.

ਤਿਸ ਤੇ ਭਾਰੁ ਤਲੈ ਕਵਣੁ ਜੋਰੁ ॥
What Power holds and supports the weight of this world?

ਜੋਰੁ here is singular masculine word - Power - and the aunkar indicates that.

Same with ਭਾਰੁ and ਕਵਣੁ.

Bhar means "weight". Bharu means "one who applies weight". So here it should be pronounced as Bhar, not Bharu.

 

And pronouncing it on other words, makes the word lose its meaning.

E.g. ਗਿਆਨੁ

Gyan means "knowledge". Gyani and Gyanee mean "of knowledge" often "person of knowledge".

Gyanu and Gyanoo have no meaning.

 

So that's why I think the Aunkars are only there to indicate words that are both Singular and Masculine.

Most mainstream Gurbani Grammar scholars agree with that.

 

Where we disagree is that they think Aunkar should never be pronounced, whereas I think in some words it should be.

Some of these words I talked about in my Aunkar thread.

 

Depends on how you pronounce it.

good luck mate

Spoilt little children need a bit of luck

On 6/18/2018 at 8:37 PM, BhagatSingh said:

The Aunkar on these words is only there to indicate a Singular, Masculine Noun, so it should not be pronounced.

You are wrong.  According to moharni the aunkar as well as sihari etc should be pronounced. To say it should not be pronounced is indicating that 'whoever' wrote the shabad is incorrect.

Why would such beings put aunkar (for eg) if it was not to be pronounced? 

On 6/18/2018 at 8:43 PM, BhagatSingh said:

It would be pronounced like Hurry, where the y is a sihari,and u is no matra (so no puckered lips).

Yes so hurry, if you like, is indicating a bihari not sihari..