angy15

What does SGGS says abt RED color or any color ? Can anyone provide shabads, because our Guruji have been in the highest avastha and he would have definitely give us some information in SGGS.

You seems to be totally out of Sync with the discussion.How is above quoted text related to Dhandriwala ? kindly explain . Where is this source of information coming from is it in his Varan ?

I see Bhai Ranjit Singh Transformation to Gurusikh equivalent of Sajjan Thug transformation A transformation from being a ritualistic pracharak to authentic pracharak of SGGS !!!

If you are writing this in reference to Dhandriwala video on colors.I would request you to point whats wrong or anti Gurmat he has said . If you cant't point out the mistake this comment of yours doesn't hold any substance. Only source to take spiritual nourishment is SGGS. All these kathavachaks are like helping tools of it. Whatever one speaks abt Gurmat has to bench marked WITH SGGS whether they are TAKSALi or MISSIONARY.There is no place for blind beliefs or FAKE SAKHIS!! "SGGS IS THE FINAL AUTHORITY"

That is exactly my point of argument.Guruji has used color red and not chosen from other four colors as claimed in the video to speak abt spritual love .So the Taksali Representative lies when he says that Satguru has abstained us to use the red and green color . He is creating a false belief that four colors are primary colors of sikhi.

Did I mentioned anywhere abt it?

Why its bothering you . It is uploaded to let sangat know what SGGS says abt colors .Rejecting four colors subsribed by Taksali

First stop fooling people abt Four colors being Gurusikh Mariyada.It is not sikh mariyda it is your Sant Samaj mariyda.This Taksali guy in the video is saying all lies regarding colors. Lie: He says Red and Green Color are rejected by Satguru .Where did they rejected please tell us . Truth : What SGGS says abt Red color : ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ ਮਹਲਾ ੫ ॥ ਲਾਲ ਰੰਗੁ ਤਿਸ ਕਉ ਲਗਾ ਜਿਸ ਕੇ ਵਡਭਾਗਾ ॥ ਮੈਲਾ ਕਦੇ ਨ ਹੋਵਈ ਨਹ ਲਾਗੈ ਦਾਗਾ ॥੧॥ Translation ਹੇ ਭਾਈ! ਜਿਸ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਦੇ ਵੱਡੇ ਭਾਗ ਜਾਗ ਪੈਣ, ਉਸ ਦੇ ਹੀ ਮਨ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ-ਪਿਆਰ ਦਾ ਗੂੜ੍ਹਾ ਲਾਲ ਰੰਗ ਚੜ੍ਹਦਾ ਹੈ। ਇਹ ਰੰਗ ਐਸਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ (ਵਿਕਾਰਾਂ ਦੀ) ਮੈਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਲੱਗਦੀ, ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਵਿਕਾਰਾਂ ਦਾ ਦਾਗ਼ ਨਹੀਂ ਲੱਗਦਾ।੧। Where is this takslai ideology coming from definitely not from Gurbani but from Sant Samaj ideology and their ideology is based on Brahmanism .So this how it is related to Brahmanism virus. This answers your questions Now what Dhandrianwala says abt colors which is as per Gurmat.

Why not both How ridiculous when you say its my opinion.Its SGGS opinion Your fellow guy lies when he says in the videos says that satguru has rejected two colors red and green for the GuruSikhs .Can you give me the reference from SGGS where it is mentioned .I am sure you will not able to provide.It is your ownmaking.Shame on you Its a virus because this ideology is coming from other culture and being mixed with Gurmat which can be clearly seen from the video . SGGS does not give importance to any colors . Its

If still you insist to discuss we can discuss just provide me the source of this information (VAARAN number etc ). So that I can read first before commenting.

Yes .....has infiltrated through SANT SAMAJ (TAKSAL,DERAS, etc) .It has also infltrated into this Discusiion forum website . & what is Brahamanism ? listen from 1:20

brahmanism No No just be carefull or you will be offtrack from the discussion.Be clear of everthing. Just make sure you clearly understand abt the concept of this Brahmanism virus (if nedded watch the video again )it will help you in discussing in future.

This term was coined by scholar Dr. Gurdarshan Singh Dhillion for these guys. Listen carefully till end.Very interesting videos!! What has this virus done listen from 3:05.

How is this query related to Dhandrianwal?Kindly elaborate

@paapiman I am surprised the question was asked to you .So you are suppose to answer it.The SGGS does not subscribe to your four color methodology .So please clarify it. if you cannot then again its a Brahmanism Virus which has crept into our panth.

They are filled with so much hatred.Its very sad.

I really don't know.what I can say there sikh belief systems is taksali Orientated which is getting exposed from present day authentic pracharaks.this is making them jittery and nervous.

When a guy is head of a very important organisation he is not supposed to be silent and that too at a important time when so many issues are plaguing sikh panth .Let be inspired by the life's of our great gurus, Bhai Jarnail Singh Binderwala.they were not silent or ignorant as this fellow.

Also "Ek Sikh Rehat Mariyada" as also advocated by Dhandriwala.

They have hijacked the sikh religion.they are equivalent of hindu pujaris .all these so called babas,mahapurakh are politically affiliated. The damdami taksali head bhai dhumma ,you will never see him preaching gurmat,neither he talks abt drugs,alcohol problems or any issue facing the Kaum. He is a Sarakari baba. All they can do is killing,fighting ,removing turbans. Leave aside what they say abt Dhandriwala.they cannot even defend their aukhati mariyada.

Let anyone figure out what is anti gurmat in this video? I don't understand how is his preaching are anti gurmat after watching this video.He is a true pracharak of sikhi. Has any present day taksali Kathavachak openly opposed the karamkands which bhai Sahib is mentioning ?

He is really giving competition to Pujari class

@tva prasad I think their is a strong misconception among members abt Sikh Missionaries.They undertake basically SGGS based prachar not relying so much on Sakhis. Let us understand how their prachar is differnrent from Sampridya through a Sakhi Pundit Lal Chand’s meeting with Guru ji: At Aurangzeb’s request, Guru Har Krishan traveled to Delhi. On his way to Delhi, Guru ji stayed at a place called Panjokhara. There lived a pundit Lal Chand, who was very proud of his caste and knowledge. He came to see the young Guru and asked sarcastically “It’s said that you sit on the Gur gaddi of Guru Nanak, but what do you know about Bhagavad Gita”? Guru ji smiled at Lal Chand’s request and asked for Chhajju Ram. Chhajju was an illiterate, mute and deaf, village water-carrier who was helping in the kitchen at that moment. Guru ji asked Chhajju to sit in front and explain to the pundit the gist of Bhagavad Gita. Guru ji touched Chhajju’s head with a stick (wand). Chhajju Ram recited Gita in front of all there. Lal Chand was ashamed and fell at the Guru’s feet. This is typical Sampridya based Sakhis we listen abt How Guruji Touched Chhajjus Head with is stick and Miricale happened Now this same Sakhis how will Sikh Missionary Pracharak will interpret . Instead of magical stick he would narrate it as: Chhajju Ram belonged to a mythical lower caste, members of this caste were forbidden to read or learn. They were considered deaf and mute by the mythical high caste Brahmins. Guru Nanak’s open door policy to everyone helped these mythical lower caste groups to get knowledgeable by following Guru’s teachings. They were no longer assumed deaf and mute in the society. If we take the magic wand out of this story and say Chhajju was not really a handicap person (just considered) then it will be a wonderful true story otherwise it is a Mythical. We should not forget that Guru Nanak rejected all kinds of miracles.

Giani Thakur says Akal Takht was attacked because Guru Gobind Singh wanted it!! How Ridiculous it can be.